Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of semi-active control strategies for base isolated buildings

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative analytical study of several control strategies for semi-active (SA) devices installed in baseisolated buildings aiming to reduce earthquake induced vibrations is presented. Three force tracking schemes comprising a linear controller plus a “clipped” algorithm and a nonlinear output feedback controller (NOFC) are considered to tackle this problem. Linear controllers include the integral controller (I), the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and the model predictive controller (MPC). A single degree-of-freedom system subjected to input accelerograms representative of the Portuguese seismic actions are first used to validate and evaluate the feasibility of these strategies. The obtained results show that structural systems using SA devices can in general outperform those equipped with passive devices for lower fundamental frequency structural systems, namely base-isolated buildings. The effectiveness of the proposed strategies is also evaluated on a 10 storey base-isolated dual frame-wall building. The force tracking scheme with an integral controller outperforms the other three as well as the original structure and the structure equipped with passive devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre N, Ikhouane F and Rodellar J (2011), “Proportional-plus-integral Semiactive Control Using Magnetorheological Dampers,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(10): 2185–2200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar A, Pozo F, Acho L, Rodellar J and Barbat A (2010), “Hierarchical Semi-active Control of Baseisolated Structures Using a New Inverse Model of Magnetorheological Dampers,” Computers and Structures, 88(7–8): 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharti SD, Dumne SM and Shrimali MK (2014), “Earthquake Response of Asymmetric Building with MR Damper,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13: 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciati F, Rodellar J and Yildirim U (2012), “Active and Semi-active Control of Structures–Theory and Applications: A Review of Recent Advances,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 23(11): 1181–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano MG, Colato GP and Infanti S (2004), “Use of Viscous Dampers and Shock Transmission Units in the Seismic Protection of Buildings,” Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B. C., Canada, Paper no. 2174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (1995), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd ed), Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu SY, Soong TT and Reinhorn AM (2005), Active, Hybrid and Semi-Active Structural Control–A Design and Implementation Handbook, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke SJ and Spencer BF (1997), “A Comparison of Semiactive Control Strategies for the Magnetorheological Dampers,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems (IIS 97), Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas, pp. 580–584.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gattulli V, Lepidi M and Potenza F (2009), “Seismic Protection of Frame Structures via Semi-active Control: Modeling and Implementation Issues,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8: 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin HP and Aldemir U (2005), “Optimal Control of Earthquake Response Using Semiactive Isolation,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 131(8): 769–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda Y (2009), “Active and Semi-active Vibration Control of Buildings in Japan–Practical Applications and Verification,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 16(7–8): 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isidori A (1995), Nonlinear Control Systems–Volume 1 (3rd ed), Springer-Verlag, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen LM and Dyke SJ (2000), “Semi-active Control Strategies for MR Dampers: A Comparative Study,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 126(8): 795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung H, Min Choi K, Spencer BF and Lee I (2006), “Application of Some Semi-active Control Algorithms to a Smart Base-isolated Building Employing MR Dampers,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 13(2–3): 693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsu H, Shinozaki Y, Sanui Y, Maseki R, Yoshida K, Kitagawa Y, Toyama J and Nagashima I (2007), “A Building with Semi-active Base Isolation Using Sliding Mode Control,” Proceedings of SMSST’07, World Forum on Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology, Chongqing & Nanjing, China, pp. 523–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo N, Rodellar J, Vehí J and De la Sen M (2001), “Composite Semiactive Control of a Class of Seismically Excited Structures,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, 338(2–3): 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maciejowski J (2002), Predictive control with constraints, Pearson Education Limited, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrparvar B and Khoshnoudian T (2012), “Performance-based Semi-active Control Algorithm for Protecting Base Isolated Buildings from Near-fault Earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11: 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NP EN 1998–1 (2010), Eurocode 8–1: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Eurocodigo8, Projecto de Estruturas para Resistência aos Sismos–Parte1: Regras Gerais, Acções Símicas e Regras para Edifícios, Instituto Português da Qualidade, Caparica.

  • Ogata K (1970), Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou Jinping and Li Hui (2009), “Design Approaches for Active, Semi-active and Passive Control Systems Based on Analysis of Characteristics of Active Control Force,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 8: 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preumont A (2002), Vibration Control of Active Structures-An Introduction (2nd ed), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin X, Zhang X and Sheldon C (2008), “Study on Semiactive Control of Mega-sub Controlled Structure by MR Damper Subject to Random Wind Loads,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7: 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Pozo F, Bahar A, Acho L, Vidal Y and Rodellar J (2012), “Force-derivative Feedback Semiactive Control of Base-isolated Buildings Using Large-scale MR Fluid Dampers,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 19(1): 120–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadek F and Mohraz B (1998), “Semiactive Control Algorithms for Structures with Variable Dampers,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 124(9): 981–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shook D, Lin P, Lin T and Roschke PN (2007), “A Comparative Study in the Semi-active Control of Isolated Structures,” Smart Materials and Structures, 16(4): 1433–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogestad S and Postlethwaite I (1996), Multivariable Feedback Control-Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soong TT and Dargush GF (1997), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soong TT and Spencer BF (2002), “Supplemental Energy Dissipation: State-of-the-art and State-of-the Practice,” Engineering Structures, 24(3): 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer BF (2008), “Structural Control in Honor of Takuji Kobori,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer BF and Nagarajaiah S (2003), “State of the Art of Structural Control,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 129(7): 845–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symans MD and Constantinou MC (1995), “Development and Experimental Study of Semi-active Fluid Damping Devices for Seismic Protection of Structures,” National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), Buffalo, Report no. 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symans MD and Constantinou MC (1999), “Semi-active Control Systems for Seismic Protection of Structures: a State-of-the-art Review,” Engineering Structures, 21(6): 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DH and Liao WH (2011), “Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers: a Review of Parametric Modeling,” Smart Materials and Structures, 20(2): 023001(34pp).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapateiro M, Karimi HR, Luo N and Spencer BF (2010), “Real-time Hybrid Testing of Semiactive Control Strategies for Vibration Reduction in a Structure with MR Damper,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17(4): 427–451.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Suleman.

Additional information

Supported by: The Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for the PhD scholarship provided (reference SFRH/BD/84769/2012)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, F., Morais, P. & Suleman, A. A comparative study of semi-active control strategies for base isolated buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14, 487–502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0039-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0039-9

Keywords

Navigation