Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic fragility assessment of existing sub-standard low strength reinforced concrete structures

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analytical seismic fragility assessment framework is presented for the existing low strength reinforced concrete structures more common in the building stock of the developing countries. For realistic modelling of such substandard structures, low strength concrete stress-strain and bond-slip capacity models are included in calibrating material models. Key capacity parameters are generated stochastically to produce building population and cyclic pushover analysis is carried out to capture inelastic behaviour. Secant period values are evaluated corresponding to each displacement step on the capacity curves and used as seismic demand. A modified capacity demand diagram method is adopted for the degrading structures, which is further used to evaluate peak ground acceleration from back analysis considering each point on the capacity curve as performance point. For developing fragility curves, the mean values of peak ground acceleration are evaluated corresponding to each performance point on the series of capacity curves. A suitable probability distribution function is adopted for the secant period scatter at different mean peak ground acceleration values and probability of exceedance of limit states is evaluated. A suitable regression function is used for developing fragility curves and regression coefficients are proposed for different confidence levels. Fragility curves are presented for a low rise pre-seismic code reinforced concrete structure typical of developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad S (2011), “Seismic Vulnerability of Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Structures in Developing Countries,” Ph.D Thesis, The University of Sheffield, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Pilakoutas K, Neocleous K and Zaman Q U (2014), “Stress-strain Model for Low Strength Concrete in Uni-axial Compression,” Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering, DOI: 10.1007/s13369-014-1411-1, 20(2): 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed M (2006), “Earthquake Loss Estimation and Structural Vulnerability Assessment for Greater Cairo,” Ph.D Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Publication of Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.

  • Calvi GM (1999), “A Displacement-based Approach for Vulnerability Evaluation of Classes of Buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3: 411–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM, Pinho R and Crowley H (2006) “Stateof- the-knowledge on the Period Elongation of RC Buildings during Strong Ground Shaking,” First European Conference on Earhquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celik OC and Ellingwood BR (2008), “Modeling Beamcolumn Joints in Fragility Assessment of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12: 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik OC and Ellingwood BR (2010), “Seismic Fragilities for Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames–role of Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainties,” Structural Safety, 32: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO and Foutch DA (2002), “Probabilistic Basis for 2000 sac Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 128(4): 526–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Pinho R and Bommer J (2004), “A Probabilistic Displacement-based Vulnerability Assessment Procedure for Earthquake Loss Estimation,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2(2): 173–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dipasquale E and Cakmak AS (1988), “Identification of the Serviceability Limit State and Detection of Seismic Structural Damage,” Report NCEER-88-0022, National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymiotis C, Kappos AJ and Chryssanthopoulos MK (1999), “Seismic Reliability of RC Frames with Uncertain Drift, and Member Capacity,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 125(9): 1038–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erberik MA (2008), “Fragility-based Assessment of Typical Mid-rise and Low-rise RC Buildings in Turkey,” Engineering Structures, 30: 1360–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erberik MA and Elnashai AS (2005), “Seismic Vulnerability of Flat Slab Structures,” Technical Report, Mid America Earthquake Centre, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.

  • FEMA440 (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project), Redwood City, California.

  • Franchin P, Lupoi A, Pinto PE and Schotanus MIJ (2003), “Sesimic Fragility of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using a Response Surface Approach,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7(1) Special Issue: 45–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardoni P, Mosalam KM and Der Kiureghian A (2003), “Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models and Fragility Estimates for RC Bridges,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7(1) Special Issue: 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides N (2008), “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of RC Buildings and Risk Assessment for Cyprus,” Ph.D Thesis, The University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides N, Ahmad S, Pilakoutas K, Neocleous K and Chrysostomou C (2014), “A Probabilistic Analytical Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Framework for Substandard Structures in Developing Countries,” Earthquake and Structures, 6(6): 665–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides N, Pilakoutas K and Ahmad S (2012), “Vulnerability Curves for RC Substandard Buildings,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE), Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang K (2002), “Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Buildings,” PhD thesis, Swiss Fedearal Institute of Technology, Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN and Park R (1988), “Theoretical Stress-strain Model for Confined Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114(8): 1804–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay M, Conover W and Beckman R (1979), “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code,” Technometrics, 21: 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosalam K, Ayala G, White R and Roth C (1997), “Seismic Fragility of l RC Frames with and without Masonry Infill Walls,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1: 693–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinho R, Bommer JJ and Glaister S (2002), “A Simplified Approach to Displacement-based Earthquake Loss Estimation Analysis,” Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, U.K., Paper no. 738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash V, Powell G and Campbell S (1994), “Drain-3d Base Program Description and User Guide, Version 1.10,” Report No. UCB/SEMM-94/07, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy S, Gardoni P and Bracci J (2006), “Probabilistic Demand Models and Fragility Curves for Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 132(10): 1563–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T and Elnashai AS (2005), “A New Analytical Procedure for the Derivation of Displacement-based Vulnerability Curves for Population of RC Structures,” Engineering Structures, 27(3): 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezen H and Moehle JP (2004), “Shear Strength Model for Lightly Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(11): 1692–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal A and Kiremidjian A (1997), “A Method for Earthquake Motion-damage Relationships with Application to Reinforced Concrete Frames,” NCEER Report NCEER-97-0008, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembaty Z, Kowalski M and Pospisil S (2006), “Dynamic Identification of an RC Frame in Progressive States of Damage,” Engineering Structures, 28(5): 668–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohaib Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, S., Kyriakides, N., Pilakoutas, K. et al. Seismic fragility assessment of existing sub-standard low strength reinforced concrete structures. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14, 439–452 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0035-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0035-0

Keywords

Navigation