Bi-normalized response spectra and seismic intensity in Bucharest for 1986 and 1990 Vrancea seismic events

  • Florin Pavel
  • Radu Vacareanu
  • Cristian Neagu
  • Andrei Pricopie
Article

Abstract

The Vrancea subcrustal earthquakes of August 30, 1986 and May 30, 1990 are the two most recent seismic events that have occurred in Romania with moment magnitudes MW ≥ 6.9. The spectral analysis of the strong ground motions recorded in Bucharest reveals that despite small differences in magnitude between the 1986 and 1990 earthquakes, their frequency contents are very different, sometimes even opposing. The main focus of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the response spectra in terms of the bi-normalized response spectra (BNRS) proposed by Xu and Xie (2004 and 2007) for strong ground motions recorded in Bucharest during these two seismic events. The mean absolute acceleration and relative velocity response spectra for the two earthquakes are discussed and compared. Furthermore, the mean bi-normalized absolute acceleration and normalized relative velocity response spectra with respect to the control period TC are computed for the ground motions recorded in Bucharest in 1986 and 1990. The predominant period TP is also used in this study for the normalization of the spectral period axis. Subsequently, the methodology proposed by Martinez-Perreira and Bommer (1998) is applied in order to estimate the seismic intensity of the two events. The results are discussed and several conclusions regarding the possibility of using the bi-normalized response spectra (BNRS) are given.

Keywords

response spectra bi-normalized response spectra dynamic amplification factor control period damage potential parameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Araya R and Saragoni GR (1984), “Earthquake Accelerogram Destructiveness Potential Factor,” Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, USA, pp. 835–842.Google Scholar
  2. Arias A (1970), “A Measure of Earthquake Intensity,” In RJ Hansen, ed., Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 438–483.Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright DE and Longuet-Higgins MS (1956), “The Statistical Distribution of the Maxima of a Random Function”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 237(1209): 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eurocode 8 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance — Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings.Google Scholar
  5. Fajfar P, Vidic T and Fischinger M (1990), “A Measure of Earthquake Motion Capacity to Damage mediumperiod Structures,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 9(5): 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ganas A, Grecu B, Batsi E and Radulian M (2010), “Vrancea Slab Earthquakes Triggered by Static Stress Transfer,” Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 10: 2565–2577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gazetas G (2012), “Some Presumptions on the Nature of Base Excitation May Erroneously Affect the Response of Strongly Inelastic Systems,” Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, Keynote & invited lecture.Google Scholar
  8. Kramer S (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.Google Scholar
  9. Lang D, Molina-Palacios S, Lindholm C and Balan S (2012), “Deterministic Earthquake Damage and Loss Assessment for the City of Bucharest, Romania,” Journal of Seismology, 16: 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lungu D, Cornea T, Aldea A and Zaicenco A (1997), “Basic Representation of Seismic Action” in Lungu D, Mazzolani F and Savidis S, eds, Design of Structures in Seismic Zones: Eurocode 8 — Worked Examples. (TEMPUS PHARE CM Project 01198: Implementiong of structural Eurocodes in Romanian Civil Engineering standards) Bridgeman Ltd., Timisoara, Romania, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
  11. Lungu D, Demetriu S and Cornea T (1992), “Frequency bandwidth of Vrancea Earthquakes and the 1991 Edition of Seismic Code in Romania,” Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 10: 5633–5638.Google Scholar
  12. Lungu D, Vacareanu R, Aldea A and Arion C (2000), Advanced Structural analysis, Conspress, Bucharest.Google Scholar
  13. Maniatakis C and Spyrakos C (2012), “A New Methodology to Determine Elastic Displacement Spectra in the Near-fault Region,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 35: 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martinez-Pereira A and Bommer J (1998), “What is the Near-field?”, In: E Booth, ed., Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 245–252.Google Scholar
  15. Newmark N and Hall WJ (1969), “Seismic Design Criteria for Nuclear Reactor Facilities,” Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2: B5.1–12.Google Scholar
  16. Newmark N and Hall WJ (1982), “Earthquake Spectra and Design,” Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  17. P100-1/2006 (2006): Code for Seismic Design — Part I — Design Prescriptions for Buildings, Ministry of Transports, Constructions and Tourism.Google Scholar
  18. Pavel F (2012), “The Effects of the Intensity and of the Frequency Contents of Seismic Motions on the Nonlinear Structural Response,” PhD thesis, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  19. Pavel F, Aldea A and Vacareanu R (2013a), “Near-field Strong Ground Motion Records from Vrancea Earthquakes,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Earthquake Engineering SE-50EEE, Skopje, Macedonia, Paper No. 190.Google Scholar
  20. Pavel F and Lungu D (2012), “Frequency Content Indicators of Strong Ground Motions,” Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal. Paper no. 2372.Google Scholar
  21. Pavel F, Vacareanu R, Aldea A and Arion C (2013b), “Source Effects on the Spectral Characteristics of Ground Motions Recorded in Bucharest Area during Vrancea Earthquakes of 1986 and 1990,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17(8): 1192–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pomonis A, Coburn A and Ledbetter S (1990), “The Vrancea, Romania Earthquakes of 30–31 May 1990 — A Field Report by E.E.F.I.T.,” E.E.F.I.T., London, U.K.Google Scholar
  23. Rathje E, Abrahamson N and Bray J (1998), “Simplified Frequency Content Estimates of Earthquake Ground Motions,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(2): 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shabestari K and Yamazaki F (2001), “A Proposal of Instrumental Seismic Intensity Scale Compatible with MMI Evaluated from Three-component Acceleration Records,” Earthquake Spectra, 17(4): 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sokolov V, Boese M and Wenzel F (2008), “Shakemap Methodology Based on Fourier Amplitude Spectra and Its Application for the Case of Vrancea Earthquakes in Romania,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  26. Vanmarcke EH (1976), “Structural Response to Earthquakes,” In C Lomnitz, E Rosenblueth, eds, Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287–338.Google Scholar
  27. Xu L, Shengchao Y and Xie L (2010), “Response Spectra for Nuclear Structures on Rock Sites Considering Near-Fault Directivity Effect,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations, 9(2): 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu L and Xie L (2004), “Bi-normalized Response Spectral Characteristics of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations, 3(2): 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu L and Xie L (2007), “Near-fault Ground Motion Bi-normalized Pseudo-velocity Spectra and Its Applications,” Acta Seismologica Sinica, 20(5): 544–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ziotopoulou A and Gazetas G (2010), “Are Current Design Spectra Sufficient for Soil-structure Systems on Soft Soils?” In: M Fardis, ed., Advances in Performancebased Earthquake Engineering, Springer, pp. 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florin Pavel
    • 1
    • 3
  • Radu Vacareanu
    • 1
  • Cristian Neagu
    • 1
  • Andrei Pricopie
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Reinforced Concrete StructuresTechnical University of Civil Engineering BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Strength of Materials, Bridges and TunnelsTechnical University of Civil Engineering BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Faculty of Civil, Industrial and Agricultural BuildingsTechnical University of Civil Engineering BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations