Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 463–472 | Cite as

Seismic analysis of diagrid structural frames with shear-link fuse devices

Technical Papers


This paper presents a new concept for enhancing the seismic ductility and damping capacity of diagrid structural frames by using shear-link fuse devices and its seismic performance is assessed through nonlinear static and dynamic analysis. The architectural elegancy of the diagrid structure attributed to its triangular leaning member configuration and high structural redundancy make this system a desirable choice for tall building design. However, forming a stable energy dissipation mechanism in diagrid framing remains to be investigated to expand its use in regions with high seismicity. To address this issue, a diagrid framing design is proposed here which provides a competitive design option in highly seismic regions through its increased ductility and improved energy dissipation capacity provided by replaceable shear links interconnecting the diagonal members at their ends. The structural characteristics and seismic behavior (capacity, stiffness, energy dissipation, ductility) of the diagrid structural frame are demonstrated with a 21-story building diagrid frame subjected to nonlinear static and dynamic analysis. The findings from the nonlinear time history analysis verify that satisfactory seismic performance can be achieved by the proposed diagrid frame subjected to design basis earthquakes in California. In particular, one appealing feature of the proposed diagrid building is its reduced residual displacement after strong earthquakes.


diagrid structure nonlinear analysis seismic behavior shear link steel structure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AISC (2005), “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings,” ANSI/AISC 341-05, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  2. ASCE (2010), “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” ASCE/SEI 7-10/ANSI, Reston, Va.Google Scholar
  3. Hjelmstad KD and Popov EP (1983), “Cyclic Behavior and Design of Link Beams,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 109(10): 2387–2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kasai K and Popov EP (1986), “General Behavior of WF Steel Shear Link Beams,” Struct. Eng., ASCE, 112(2): 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim J and Lee YH (2009), “Progressive Collapse Resisting Capacity of Tube-type Structures,” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 10: 1002/tal.512.Google Scholar
  6. Kim YJ, Jung IY, Ju Y-K, Park SJ and Kim SD (2011), “Cyclic Behavior of Diagrid Nodes with H-section Braces,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 136(9): 1111–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leonard J (2007), “Investigation of Shear Lag Effect in High-rise Buildings with Diagrid System,” M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  8. Li L, Zhao X and Ke K (2011), “Static Behavior of Planar Intersecting CFST Connection in Diagrid Structure,” Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 5(3): 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mansour N, Shen Y, Christopoulos C and Tremblay R (2008), “Seismic Design of EBF Steel Frames Using Replaceable Nonlinear Links,” Proc. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  10. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH and Fenves GL (2009), The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES) User Command-Language Manual, Pacific Earthquake Eng. Research Center, Univ. Calif., Berkeley, CA, ( Scholar
  11. McKenna FT (1997), “Object-oriented Finite Element Programming: Frameworks for Analysis, Algorithms and Parallel Computing,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Menegotto M and Pinto PE (1973), “Method of Analysis of Cyclically Loaded RC Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-elastic Behavior of Elements under Normal Force and Bending, Preliminary Report,” IABSE, Vol. 13, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  13. Moon K-S, Connor JJ and Fernandez JE (2007), “Diagrid Structural Systems for Tall Buildings: Characteristics and Methodology for Preliminary Design,” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 16: 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Okazaki T, Arce G, Ryu H-C and Engelhardt MD (2005), “Experimental Study of Local Buckling, Overstrength, and Fracture of Links in Eccentrically Braced Frames,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 131(10): 1526–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Okazaki T and Engelhardt MD (2007), “Cyclic Loading Behavior of EBF Links Constructed of ASTM A992 steel,” J. of Construction Steel Research., 63: 751–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Okazaki T, Engelhardt MD, Nakashima M and Suita K (2006), “Experimental Performance of Link-to-column Connections in Eccentrically Braced Frames,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 132(8): 1201–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahimian A and Eilon Y (2007), “Something Old, Something New,” Modern Steel Construction, AISC, April 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Ramadan T and Ghobarah A (1995), “Analytical Model for Shear-link Behavior,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 121(11): 1574–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Richards PW (2004), “Cyclic Stability and Capacity Design of Steel Eccentrically Braced Frames,” Doctoral dissertation, Univ. of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  20. Richards PW and Uang C-M (2005), “Effect of Flange Width Thickness Ratio on Eccentrically Braced Frame Link Cyclic Rotation Capacity,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 131(10): 1546–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ricles JM and Popov EP (1987), “Dynamic Analysis of Seismically Resistant Eccentrically Braced Frames,” Rep. No.VCBIEERC-87107, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
  22. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthula S and Sun J (1997), “Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project,” SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Taranath B (1997), Steel, Concrete, & Composite Design of Tall Buildings, McGraw-Hill, Second Edition.Google Scholar
  24. Teng J, Guo W, Rong B and Li Z (2011), “Seismic Performance Research of High-rise Diagrid Tube-core Tube Structures,” Advanced Materials Research, 163–167, 2005–2012.Google Scholar
  25. Zareian F and Medina RA (2010), “A Practical Method for Proper Modeling of Structural Damping in Inelastic Plane Structural Systems,” Computers & Structures, 88(1–2): 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations