Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of earthquake ground motion incoherency on multi-support structures

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A linear response history analysis method is used to determine the influence of three factors: geometric incoherency, wave-passage, and local site characteristics on the response of multi-support structures subjected to differential ground motions. A one-span frame and a reduced model of a 24-span bridge, located in Las Vegas, Nevada are studied, in which the influence of each of the three factors and their combinations are analyzed. It is revealed that the incoherency of earthquake ground motion can have a dramatic influence on structural response by modifying the dynamics response to uniform excitation and inducing pseudo-static response, which does not exist in structures subjected to uniform excitation. The total response when all three sources of ground motion incoherency are included is generally larger than that of uniform excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Ghaffar A and Nazmy AS (1991) “3-D Nonlinear Seismic Behavior of Cable-Stayed Bridge,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 117(11): 3456–3476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson NA, Bolt BA, Darragh RB, Penzien J and Tsai Y B (1987) “The SMART-1 Accelerograph Array (1980-1987): A Review,” Earthquake Spectra, 3: 267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerji P, Murudi MA, Shah and Popplewell N (2000), “Tuned Liquid Dampers for Controlling Earthquake Response of Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29: 587–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnamfar F and Sugimura Y (1999) “Dynamic Response of Adjacent Structures Under Spatially Variable Seismic,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 14: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresnev IA, Wen L and Yeh YT (1994) “Source, Path and Site Effects on Dominant Frequency and Spatial Variation of Strong Ground Motion Recorded By SMART1 And SMART2 Arrays in Taiwan,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23: 583–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanoff JL, Goldberg JE and Schiff (1965) “The Effect of Ground Transmission Time on The Response of Long Structures,” Bull Seism Soc Am, 55(3): 627–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough R and Penzien J (1975), Dynamics of structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (1996) “A Coherency Model for Spatially Varying Ground Motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25: 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettouney M, Hapij A and Gajer R (2001) “Frequency Domain Analysis of Long-Span Bridges Subjected to Non Uniform Seismic Motions,” J. of Bridge Engineering, 6(6): 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin G, Saiidi M and Maragakis E (1995), “Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis of Isolated Bridges with Multiple Columns,” Report No. CCEER-95-6, Engineering Research and Development Center, University of Nevada, Reno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao H (1989), “Effects of Spatial Variation of Ground Motions on Large Multiply-Supported Structures,” Report, UCB/EERC-89/06, University Of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao H (1998) “Response of Two-Way Eccentric Building to Nonuniform Base Excitations,” Engineering Structures, 20(8): 677–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao H and Zhang S (1999) “Spatial Ground Motion Effect on Relative Displacement of Adjacent Building Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28: 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harichandran RS, Hawwari A and Sweiden BN (1996), “Response of Long-Span Bridges to Spatially Varying Ground Motion,” J. of Structural Engineering, 122(5): 476–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph I, Sun, R Golesorkhi H and Bolton Seed (1988), “Dynamic Moduli and Damping Ratios for Cohesive Soils,” Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan M, Gibert R and Bard P (1996) “Influence of Seismic Waves Spatial Variability on Bridges: A Sensitivity Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic, 25(4): 795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luco JE and Wong LH (1986) “Response of A Rigid Foundation to A Spatially Random Ground Motion,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 14: 891–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monti G, Nuti C and Pinto P (1996) “Nonlinear Response of Bridges Under Multi-Support Excitation,” J. Structural Engineering, 122(10): 1147–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazmy A and Abdel-Ghaffar A (1992) “Effect of Ground Motion Spatial Variability on The Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki Y (1979) “On the siginificance of Phase Content in Earthquake Ground Motion,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7(5): 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti F (1990) “Structural Response to Non-Stationary Multiple-Support Random Excitation,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19(4): 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price T and Eberhard M (1998) “Effects of Spatially Varying Ground Motions on Short Bridges,” J. Structural Engineering, 124(8): 948–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiidi M, Itani A, Yang Q, and Ladkany S, “Multifaceted Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit Study of A Major Viaduct,” Proceedings, First International Conference and Annual Meeting of Asian-Pacific Network of Centers for Earthquake Engineering Research, Harbin, China, August 2002.

  • Shrikhande M and Gupta V (1999) “Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction Effects On The Seismic Response of Suspension Bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28: 1383–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E (2000), Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures, A publication of computer and structures. Inc., April.

  • Yang Q and Chen Y (2000) “A Practical Coherency Model for Spatially Varying Ground Motions,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 9(2):141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q and Jiang H (2001) “Generation of Ground Motion Non-Stationary Both in Time and Frequency Domains Based on Phase Difference Spectrum,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 21(3): 10–16, Harbin. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Saiidi M, Wang H and Itani A(2002), “Influences of Earthquake Ground Motion Incoherency on Multi-support Structures,” Report Number CCEER-02-2, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nevada.

  • Zerva A (1990) “Response of Multi-Span Beams to Spatially Incoherent Seismic Ground Motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 19: 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Fengxin (1992), “The Phase Difference Spectrum of Time Histories and the Generation of the Design Ground Motions”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Institute of Geophysics, China Seismology Bureau(in Chinese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Saiid Saiidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Q., Saiidi, M.S., Hang, W. et al. Influence of earthquake ground motion incoherency on multi-support structures. Earthq. Engin. Engin. Vib. 1, 167–180 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0063-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-002-0063-4

Keywords

Navigation