Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of copepod collection efficiencies by three commonly used plankton nets: A case study in Bohai Sea, China

  • Published:
Journal of Ocean University of China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection of net with a suitable mesh size is a key concern in the quantitative assessment of zooplankton, which is crucial to understand pelagic ecosystem processes. This study compared the copepod collecting efficiency of three commonly used plankton nets, namely, the China standard coarse net (505 μm mesh), the China standard fine net (77 μm), and the WP-2 net (200 μm). The experiment was performed at six stations in the Bohai Sea during the autumn of 2012. The coarse net substantially under-sampled small individuals (body widths < 672 μm) and led to the lowest species number in each tow, whereas the fine net collected all small copepod species but failed to collect rare species. The WP-2 net appeared to be a compromise of the two other nets, collecting both small copepods and rare species. The abundance of copepods collected by the coarse net (126.4 ± 86.5 ind m−3) was one to two orders of magnitude lower than that by the WP-2 net (5802.4 ± 2595.4 ind m−3), and the value of the fine net (11117.0 ± 4563.41 ind m−3) was nearly twice that of the WP-2 net. The abundance of large copepods (i.e., adult Calanus sinicus) in the three nets showed no significant differences, but the abundance of small copepods declined with decreasing mesh size. The difference in abundance resulted from the under-sampling of small copepods with body widths < 672 μm and < 266 μm by the coarse and WP-2 nets, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, X. E., and Zhuang, Z. M., 1991. Studies on the fluctuation of zooplankton biomass and its main species number in the Bohai Sea. Marine Fisheries Research, 12: 71–92 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, H. S., Sun, S., Gao, S. W., and Zhang, F., 2000. The ecological characteristics of the zooplankton community in the Bohai Sea I. Species composition and community structure. Acta Ecologia Sinica, 20 (5): 715–721 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. J., Qi, Y. P., and Liu, G. X., 2011. Spatial and temporal variations of macro-and mesozoo-plankton community in the Huanghai Sea (Yellow Sea) and East China Sea in summer and winter. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 30 (2): 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutter, R. I., and Anraku, M. 1968. Avoidance of sampler. In: Zooplankton Sampling. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology. Tranter, D. J., ed., Unesco, 75pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive Survey Office of Ocean Group of Committee of Science and Technology of the People Republic of China, 1977. Study on plankton in China Seas. Scientific Reports of ‘Comprehensive Oceanography Expedition in China Seas’. 8: 1–159 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mauro, R., Capitanio, F., and Viñas, M. D., 2009. Capture efficiency for small dominant mesozooplankters (Copepoda, Appendicularia) off Buenos Aires province (34°S-41°S), Agentine Sea, using two plankton mesh sizes. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 57 (3): 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. S., and Sell, D. W., 1985. Mesh size and collection characteristics of 50-cm conical plankton nets. Hydrobiologia, 122: 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallienne, C. P., and Robins, D. B., 2001. Is Oithona the most important copepod in the world’s oceans? Journal of Plankton Research, 23 (12): 1421–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. P., Wiebe, P. H., and Lenz, J., 2000. ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual. Academic Press, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernroth, L., 1987. Sampling and filtration efficiency of two commonly used plankton nets. A comparative study of the Nansen net and the Unesco WP2 net. Journal of Plankton Research, 9 (4): 719–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, R. R., Roff, J. C., and Chavez, F. P., 2001. Size paradigms in copepod communities: A re-examination. Hydrobiologia, 453/454: 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft, R. R., Roff, J. C., and Lombard, D., 1998. Production of tropical copepods in Kingston Harbour, Jamaica: The importance of small species. Marine Biology, 130: 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. S., Kumar, R., Dahms, H. U., Tseng, L. C., and Chen, Q. C., 2007. Mesh size affects abundance estimates of Oithona spp. (Copepoda, Cyclopoida). Crustaceana, 80 (7): 827–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. Z., Yin, J. Q., Huang, L. M., and Tan, Y. H., 2006. Spatial and temporal variations of mesozooplankton in the Pearl River estuary, China. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 67: 543–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makabe, R., Tanimura, A., and Fukuchi, M., 2012. Comparison of mesh size effects on mesozooplankton collection efficiency in the Southern Ocean. Journal of Plankton Research, 34 (5): 432–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, F., Qiu, J. W., and Wu, B. L., 1994. Zooplankton of the Yellow Sea large marine ecosystem. Journal Oceanography Huanghai Bohai Seas, 11 (3): 30–37 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. H., and Thompson, A. B., 1991. Mesh selection of copepodite and nauplius stages of four calanoid copepod species. Journal of Plankton Research, 13 (3): 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitois, S. G., Shaw, M., Fox, C. J., and Fird, C. L. J., 2009. A new fine-mesh zooplankton time series from Dove sampling station (North Sea). Journal of Plankton Research, 31 (3): 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccardi, N., 2010. Selectivity of plankton nets over mesozooplankton taxa: Implications for abundance, biomass and diversity estimation. Journal of Limnology, 69 (2): 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjoldal, H. R., Wiebe, P. H., Postel, L., Knutsen, T., Kaartvedt, S., and Sameoto, D. D., 2013. Intercomparison of zooplankton (net) sampling systems: Results from the ICES/GLOBEC sea-going workshop. Progress in Oceanography, 108: 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranter, D. J., and Smith, P. E., 1968. Filtration performance. In: Zooplankton Sampling. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology. Tranter, D. J., ed., Unesco, 26–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. T., 2004. The importance of small planktonic copepods and their roles in pelagic marine food webs. Zoological Studies, 43 (2): 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., and Wang, K., 2003. Field test of capture capabilities of two plankton nets. Journal of Fisheries of China, 27 (suppl): 98-102 (in Chinese with English abstract).

  • Wang, R., Zhang, H. Y., Wang, K., and Zuo, T., 2002. Distribution and population dynamics of Paracalanus parvus, Paracalanus crassirostris, and Acratia bifilosa (copepoda, calanoida) in the Bohai Sea. Chinese Journal of Oceanography and Limnology, 20 (4): 348–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, P. H., and Benfield, M. C., 2003. From the Hensen net toward four-dimensional biological oceanography. Progress in Oceanography, 56 (1): 7–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. C., Wang, K., Gao, S. W., and Wang, R., 2002. Zooplankton in the Bohai Sea in spring and autumn. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 33 (6): 630–639 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuo, T., Wang, R., Chen, Y. Q., Gao, S. W., and Wang, K., 2006. Autumn net copepod abundance and assemblages in relation to water masses on the continental shelf of the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Journal of Marine Systems, 59: 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangxing Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Yu, H. & Liu, G. Comparison of copepod collection efficiencies by three commonly used plankton nets: A case study in Bohai Sea, China. J. Ocean Univ. China 15, 1007–1013 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-016-3122-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-016-3122-6

Keywords

Navigation