Abstract
A great deal of ocean sensor observation data exists, for a wide range of marine disciplines, derived from in situ and remote observing platforms, in real-time, near-real-time and delayed mode. Ocean monitoring is routinely completed using sensors and instruments. Standardization is the key requirement for exchanging information about ocean sensors and sensor data and for comparing and combining information from different sensor networks. One or more sensors are often physically integrated into a single ocean ‘instrument’ device, which often brings in many challenges related to diverse sensor data formats, parameters units, different spatiotemporal resolution, application domains, data quality and sensors protocols. To face these challenges requires the standardization efforts aiming at facilitating the so-called Sensor Web, which making it easy to provide public access to sensor data and metadata information. In this paper, a Marine Sensor Web, based on SOA and EDA and integrating the MBARI’s PUCK protocol, IEEE 1451 and OGC SWE 2.0, is illustrated with a five-layer architecture. The Web Service layer and Event Process layer are illustrated in detail with an actual example. The demo study has demonstrated that a standard-based system can be built to access sensors and marine instruments distributed globally using common Web browsers for monitoring the environment and oceanic conditions besides marine sensor data on the Web, this framework of Marine Sensor Web can also play an important role in many other domains’ information integration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alves, A., Arkin, A., Askary, S., Barreto, C., Bloch, B., Curbera, F., Ford, M., Goland, Y., Guzar, A., and Kartha, N., 2007. Web services business process execution language version 2.0 (OASIS standard). WS-BPEL TC OASIS, 21–25.
Balazinska, M., Deshpande, A., Franklin, M. J., Gibbons, P. B., Gray, J., Nath, S., Hansen, M., Liebhold, M., Szalay, A., A. and Tao, V., 2007. Data management in the worldwide sensor web. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 30–40, DOI:10.1109/MPRV.2007.27.
Bröring, A., Maué, P., Janowicz, K., Nüst, D., and Malewski C., 2011. Semantically-enabled sensor plug and play for the sensor web. Sensors, 7568–7605, DOI: 10.3390/s110807568.
Bröring, A., Echterhoff, J., Jirka, S., Simonis, I., Everding, T., Stasch, C., Liang, S., and Lemmens, R., 2011. New generation sensor web enablement. Sensors, 2652–2699, DOI: 10.3390/s110302652.
Chen, N. C., Di, L. P., Yu, G. N., and Min, M., 2009. A flexible geospatial sensor observation service for diverse sensor data based on web service. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 234–242, DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.12.001.
Chen, N. C., Di, L. P., Yu, G. N., Gong, J. Y., and Wei, Y. X., 2009. Use of ebRIM-based CSW with sensor observation services for registry and discovery of remote-sensing observations. Computers and Geosciences, 360–372.
Gibbons, P. B., Karp, B., Ke, Y., Nath, S., and Seshan, S., 2003. Irisnet: An architecture for a worldwide sensor web. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(4): 22–33, DOI:10.1109/MPRV.2003.1251166.
Jeff, S., Peter, P., Jonathan, L., Mema, R., Margo, S., and Matt, W., 2004. Hourglass: An infrastructure for connecting sensor networks and applications. Technical Report, Harvard University, Columbia, 1–13.
Jirka, S., Bröring, A., and Stasch, C., 2009. Discovery mechanisms for the sensor web. Sensors, 2661–2681, DOI: 10.3390/s90402661.
Kevin, A. D., Shannon, P. J., David, W. J., Scott, C. B., Richard R. W., and Baker, V. R., 2005. Environmental studies with the sensor web: Principles and practice. Sensors, 5(1): 103–117, DOI: 10.3390/s5010103.
Kevin, A. D., 2011. The sensor web: A macro-instrument for coordinated sensing. Sensors, 270–285, DOI:10.3390/s20700270.
Lee, K., 2000. IEEE 1451: A standard in support of smart transducer networking, Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Baltimore, MD, 2: 525–528, DOI:10.1109/IMTC.2000.848791.
Liang, S. H. L., Croitoru, A., and Tao, C. V., 2005. A distributed geospatial infrastructre for sensor web. Computers and Geosciences, 221–231, DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.06.014.
Mike, B., George, P., Carl, R., and John, D., 2007. OGC sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture (OGC 07-165). Open Geospatial Consortium White Paper, 175–190, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-79996-2_10.
Mike, B., and Alex, R., 2007. Bringing the sensor web together, Geosciences, 6: 46–53.
Muehl, G., Fiege, L., and Pietzuch, P. R., 2006. Distributed Event-Based Systems. Springer, Heidelberg, 1–24.
Nischal, D., Durbha, S., King, R. L., and Younan, N. H., 2009. Sensor web for interoperability in power systems. Proceeding of North American Power Symposium (NAPS), DOI:10.1109/NAPS.2009.5484027.
Silvia, N., 2009. A survey of geosensor networks: Advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Sensors, 5664–5678, DOI: 10.3390/s90705664.
Song, E., Y., and Lee, K. B., 2009. A standard-based global ocean monitoring system. Proceedings of ICEMI’ 2009, 445–449, DOI:10.1109/ICEMI.2009.5274835.
Teillet, P. M., 2010. Sensor webs: A geostrategic technology for integrated earth sensing. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (IEEE J-STARS). 10–14, DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2050578.
van Zyl, T. L., 2008. GEOSS from orbit, a sensor web approach. Proceeding of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, DOI:10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4778811.
Wang, Y., Liu, Y. J., and Guo, Z. W., 2011. Three-dimensional ocean sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Ocean University of China, 11(4): 436–450, DOI: 10.1007/s11802-012-2111-7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, Y., Dou, J., Guo, Z. et al. Research of marine sensor web based on SOA and EDA. J. Ocean Univ. China 14, 261–268 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-015-2492-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-015-2492-5