Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and identification of a bacterium from marine shrimp digestive tract: A new degrader of starch and protein

  • Published:
Journal of Ocean University of China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is a practical approach to select candidate probiotic bacterial stains on the basis of their special traits. Production of digestive enzyme was used as a trait to select a candidate probiotic bacterial strain in this study. In order to select a bacterium with the ability to degrade both starch and protein, an ideal bacterial strain STE was isolated from marine shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) intestines by using multiple selective media. The selected isolate STE was identified on the basis of its morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics as well as molecular analyses. Results of degradation experiments confirmed the ability of the selected isolate to degrade both starch and casein. The isolate STE was aerobic, Gram-negative, rod-shaped, motile and non-spore-forming, and had catalase and oxidase activities but no glucose fermentation activity. Among the tested carbon/nitrogen sources, only Tween40, alanyl-glycine, aspartyl-glycine, and glycyl-l-glutamic acid were utilized by the isolate STE. Results of homology comparison analyses of the 16S rDNA sequences showed that the isolate STE had a high similarity to several Pseudoalteromonas species and, in the phylogenetic tree, grouped with P. ruthenica with maximum bootstrap support (100%). In conclusion, the isolate STE was characterized as a novel strain belonging to the genus Pseudoalteromonas. This study provides a further example of a probiotic bacterial strain with specific characteristics isolated from the host gastrointestinal tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai, Q., Mai, K., Zhang, W., Xu, W., Tan, B., Zhang, C., and Li., H., 2007. Effects of exogenous enzymes (phytase, non-starch polysaccharide enzyme) in diets on growth, feed utilization, nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of Japanese seabass, Lateolabrax japonicus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A, 147(2): 502–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcázar, J. L., Vendrell, D., de Blas, I., Ruiz-Zarzuela, I., Muzquiz, J. L., and Girones, O., 2008. Characterization of probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from intestinal microbiota of fish. Aquaculture, 278: 188–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Piano, M., Morellic, L., Strozzib, G. P., Allesina, S., Barbab, M., Deidda, F., Lorenzini, P., Ballaré, M., Montino, F., Orsello, M., Sartori, M., Garello, E., Carmagnola, S., Pagliarulo, M., and Capurso, L., 2006. Probiotics: from research to consumer. Digestive and Liver Disease, 38(Supplement 2): S248–S255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 664 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. M., Carton, M. W., Eardly, D. F., and Patching, J. W., 2004. Spatio-temporal variability and diversity of water column prokaryotic communities in the eastern North Atlantic. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 47: 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity, G. M., Brenner, D. J., Krieg, N. R., and Staley, J. T., 2005. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: The Proteobacteria, Part B, The Gammaproteobacteria, 2nd edition, volume 2. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 1103 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Gil, B., Roque, A., and Turnbull, J. F., 2000. The use and selection of probiotic bacteria for use in the culture of larval aquatic organisms. Aquaculture, 191: 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D. G., Thompson, J. D., and Gibson, T. J., 1996. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods in Enzymology, 266: 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel, W. H., Haberer, P., Snel, J., Schillinger, U., and Huis in’t Veld, J. H. J., 1998. Overview of gut flora and probiotics. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41: 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M. B., and Gerstein, M. J., 1960. Handbook of Microbiology. D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA, 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kar, N., and Ghosh, K., 2008. Enzyme producing bacteria in the gastrointestinal tracts of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and Channa punctatus (Bloch). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 8: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudsk, K. A., 2002. Current aspects of mucosal immunology and its influence by nutrition. The American Journal of Surgery, 183: 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Dudley, J., Nei, M., and Tamura, K., 2008. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 9(4): 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Zeng, Y., Jiao, N., Shi Y., and Hong, N., 2009. Vertical distribution and phylogenetic composition of bacteria in the Eastern Tropical North Pacific Ocean. Research in Microbiology, 164: 624–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, S., and Behera, N., 2008. Amylase activity of a starch degrading bacteria isolated from soil receiving kitchen wastes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7: 3326–3331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagne, L., Pluske, J. R., and Hampson, D. J., 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 108: 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalto, M., D’Onofrio, F., Gallo, A., Cazzato, A., and Gasbarrini, G., 2009. Intestinal microbiota and its functions. Digestive and Liver Disease, 3: 30–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omondi, J. G., and Stark, J. R., 1996. In vitro carbohydrate digestibility tests in the Indian white shrimp, Penaeus indicus. Aquaculture, 139(3–4): 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouwehand, A. C., Kirjavainen, P. V., Shortt, C., and Salminen, S., 1999. Probiotics: mechanisms and established effects. International Dairy Journal, 9: 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi, A., Kiron, V., Kobayashi, T., Puangkaew, J., Satoh, S., and Sugita, H., 2004. Immune responses in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss induced by a potential probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus JCM 1136. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 10: 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, A. K., Ahire, J. J., Pawar, S. P., Chaudhari, B. L., and Chincholkar, S. B., 2009. Comparative accounts of probiotic characteristics of Bacillus spp. isolated from food wastes. Food Research International, 42: 505–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, S., Bairagi, A., and Ray, A. K., 2005. Improvement of nutritive value of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) seed meal in the formulated diets for rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton) fingerlings after fermentation with a fish gut bacterium. Bioresource Technology, 96: 1465–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sizemore, R. K., and Stevenson, L. H., 1970. Method for the isolation of proteolytic marine bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 20: 991–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., Mair, N. S., Sharp, M. E., and Holt J. G., 1986. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Williams and Willkins, Baltimore, USA, 467–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, V. M., Chang, C. C., Wu, M. C., Gu, Y. K., Chiu, C. H., and Cheng, W., 2009. Dietary administration of the probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum, enhanced the growth, innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 26: 691–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzer, C., Çoban, D., Kamaci, H. O., Saka, Ş., Firat, K., Otgucuoǧlu, Ö., and Küçüksari, H., 2008. Lactobacillus spp. bacteria as probiotics in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L.) larvae: Effects on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities. Aquaculture, 280: 140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takaoki, T., 1917. The influence of conditions of bacterial cleavage of proteins on the cleavage products. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 32: 527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toit, M. du, Franz, C. M. A. P., Dicks, L. M. T., Schillinger, U., Haberer, P., Warlies, B., Ahrens, F., and Holzapfel, W. H., 1998. Characterization and selection of probiotic lactobacilli for a preliminary mini-pig feeding trial and their effect on serum cholesterol levels, faeces pH and faeces moisture content. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 40: 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovar, D., Zambonino, J., Cahu, C., Gatesoupe, F. J., Vázquez-Juárez, R., and Lésel, R., 2002. Effect of live yeast incorporation in compound diet on digestive enzyme activity in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Aquaculture, 204: 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A., and Lane, D. J., 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology, 173: 697–703.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiqiu Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Tan, B. & Mai, K. Isolation and identification of a bacterium from marine shrimp digestive tract: A new degrader of starch and protein. J. Ocean Univ. China 10, 287–292 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-011-1849-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-011-1849-7

Key words

Navigation