Skip to main content
Log in

Sea experiments of the Underway Conductivity-Temperature-Depth prototype made in China

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Ocean University of China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new instrument for upper ocean survey, namely the UCTD (Underway Conductivity-Temperature-Depth), which combines some of the advantages of other underway instruments, is introduced in this paper. The Introduction section presents a description of the construction and function of the UCTD, and the experiments conducted in the South China Sea on board the R/V Dong Fang Hong 2 in July 2007 and August 2008. The UCTD system, with pressure and temperature sensors in the probe, is conveniently portable, cost-effective and environment-friendly. It is hopefully suitable for future cruises. An intercomparison based on regressing with the experiment temperature data from both SeaBird plus911 CTD and the UCTD showed that the standard deviation is 0.88°C and the correlation coefficient is 0.96, achieving the goals set for the current oceanography uses. In the hydrodynamic experiments, the descending velocities and depths were calculated for different ship speeds. A pulling test was designed with a tensiometer to measure the magnitude of the pull. The maximal tension of the line was found to be 66.2 kg, which is far lower than the bearing limit of the Hollow Spectra line. Finally, some improvement suggestions are put forward for future experiments and production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S., and Darren, W., 2000. XBT/XCTD Standard Test Procedures for Reliability and Performance Tests of Expendable Probes at Sea. 3rd Session of JCOMM Ship-of-Opportunity Implementation Panel. La Jolla, California, USA, 8pp.

  • Elgin, R. H., 1994. An evaluation of XCTD performance with design improvements. OCEANS: Oceans Engineering for Today’s Technology and Tomorrow’s Preservation Proceedings, 1: 402–407. doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.1994.363868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, W. J., Lee, W., Zenk, W., and Meincke, J., 1986. A Low-Cost Digital XBT System and Its Application to the Real-Time Computation of Dynamic Height. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 3: 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, R. and Rudnick, D. L., 2000. Thermohaline variability in the upper ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 105: 16 857–16 883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flierl, G., and Robinson, A. R., 1977. XBT measurements of thermal gradient in the MODE eddy. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 7: 300–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, B., and Daniel, J. M., 1984. A system for calibration of expendable conductivity, temperature, and depth (XCTD) probe. Oceans, 16: 210–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J., 1995. Revised XCTD fall-rate equation coefficients from CTD data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12: 1367–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, A. W., Beanlands, B., and Chin-Yee, M., 1998. The Moving Vessel Profiler (MVP): In-situ sampling of plankton and physical parameters at 12 kts and the integration of a new laser/optical plankton counter. Proc. Oceanol. Int., 102: 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerome, A. S., and Christopher, N. K. M., 1985. Estimation of quasi-geostrophic modal amplitudes from XBT/CTD survey data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2: 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keisuke, M., and Tomowo, W., 1998. Preliminary results of in-situ XCTD/CTD comparison test. J. Oceanogr., 54: 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, M., Dalton, B., and Lancaster, R., 1987. XCTD sensors response characterization. Oceans, 19: 216–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankajakshan, T., Saran, A. K., Gopalakrishna, V. V., Vethamony, P., and Nilesh, A., 2002. XBT fall rate in waters of extreme temperature: a case study in the antarctic ocean. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19: 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, R., 1986. Frontal surveys with a towed profiling conductivity/temperature/ depth measurement package (SeaSoar). Nature, 323: 433–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, W., Li, H., Li, Y. Q., and Du, M., 2008. Introduction of UCTD and Its Key Technologies. Ocean Technol., 27(1): 8–18 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick, D. L., and Klinke, J., 2007. The underway conductivity-temperature-depth instrument. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24(11): 1910–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick, D. L., and Luyten, J. R., 1996. Intensive surveys of the Azores Front I. Tracers and dynamics. J. Geophys. Res., 101: 923–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariah R. H., and William, J. T., 1992. The fall rate of the T-7 XBT. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 9: 470–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaopei Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, X., Li, H., Lin, X. et al. Sea experiments of the Underway Conductivity-Temperature-Depth prototype made in China. J. Ocean Univ. China 8, 409–415 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-009-0409-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-009-0409-x

Keywords

Navigation