Skip to main content
Log in

A model for analyzing the transshipment competition relationship between the port of Hong Kong and the port of Kaohsiung

  • Published:
Journal of Ocean University of China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transshipment is an important issue in the current marine transportation. This paper constructed a mathematical programming model to elaborate the transshipment port selection for the shipping company. This model is tested by the data collected from the ports of Hong Kong and Kaohsiung. The results show that this model can be used to explain the transshipment competition relationship between the ports of Hong Kong and Kaohsiung well. A sensitivity analysis was also executed. The sensitivity analysis results showed that both the port of Hong Kong and Kaohsiung should decrease the charges of port and increase the efficiency of loading and discharging. Based on the sensitivity analysis results, some interesting conclusions and helpful suggestions were obtained for the managers of the ports of Hong Kong and Kaohsiung to improve their port management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chai, Y., 2005. International Trade. Hwa-Tai Company Press, Taiwan, 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. C., and Chen, C. Y., 1994. Study on the selection of port choice for liner ships. Proc. 9th Conf. Chin. Transp. Stud., Taiwan, 309–316.

  • Chen, M. S., 1993. Marine Transportation Management. Wei-Shen Company Press, Taiwan, 589–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. C., 2007. A fuzzy MCDM method solving marine transshipment container port selection problems. Appl. Math. Comp., 186: 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. C., Chu, C. W., and Liang, G. S., 2003. Competitiveness analysis of major ports in Eastern Asia. Int. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 5: 682–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Wang, T. F., Song, D. W., and Ji, P., 2006. The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Trans. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 40(4): 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, C. M., and Yuan, C. Y., 2002. Impact of vessel registry on shipowner’s crew costs. Trans. Plan. J., 31(3): 663–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremont, A., 2007. Global maritime networks — the case of Maersk. J. Transp. Geogr., 15(6): 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, S. H., and Chang, F. R., 2001. Applications of hub-and-spoke network model in routing liner ships. Trans. Plan. J., 30(4): 871–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. I., and Peng, M. C., 2003. Analyzing operating strategies for intermodal express shipment of marine carriers. Trans. Plan. J., 32(4): 715–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kou, T. C., and Chu, C. W., 2000. A model for port choice of liner ships. Proc. 5th Conf. Transp. Net., Taiwan, 317–326.

  • Lee, S. W., Song, D. W., and Ducruet, C., 2008. A tale of Asia’s world ports: the spatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum, 39: 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. H., 2001. Customs Practice. Zhi-Yan Company Press, Taiwan, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H. A., 2003. Modeling ship’s routing and container positioning for trans-ocean liner. Trans. Plan. J., 32(3): 423–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchow, M., and Kanafani, A., 2001. A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection. Marit. Policy Manag., 28(3): 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyr, F. Y., 2003. Evaluation of various strategic alliances among container carriers — a game approach. Trans. Plan. J., 32(3): 391–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Transportation and Communications of Taiwan, 1999a. Competition Analysis on the Major International Ports in the Asia-Pacific Region, Taiwan

  • The Ministry of Transportation & Communications of Taiwan, 1999b. Table for Pilot Charge, Taiwan, 10–11.

  • The Ministry of Transportation & Communications of Taiwan, 1999c. Table for Port Charge, Taiwan, 15–16.

  • The Ministry of Transportation & Communications of Taiwan, 2006. Transportation Data Analysis, Taiwan

  • The Transportation Department of Taiwan Province, 1998a. Competition Analysis and Overall Planning for International Ports in Taiwan — the Port of Keelung, Taiwan

  • The Transportation Department of Taiwan Province, 1998b. Competition Analysis and Overall Planning for International Ports in Taiwan — the Port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • The Transportation Department of Taiwan Province, 1998c. Competition Analysis and Overall Planning for International Ports in Taiwan — the Port of Taichung, Taiwan

  • The Transportation Department of Taiwan Province, 1999. The Construction of Service Index for Operation Performance of International Ports in Taiwan Area, Taiwan

  • Tongzon, J. L., and Sawant, L., 2007. Port choice in a competitive environment: from the shipping lines’ perspective. Appl. Econ., 39(4): 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. Z., 1999. Analysis of Transshipment Center Based on the Port of Kaohsiung. National Taiwan Marine University Press, Taiwan, 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z., 1999. Analysis of container port policy by the reaction of an equilibrium shipping market. Marit. Policy Manag., 26(4): 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien Chang Chou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chou, C.C. A model for analyzing the transshipment competition relationship between the port of Hong Kong and the port of Kaohsiung. J. Ocean Univ. China 8, 377–384 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-009-0377-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-009-0377-1

Key words

Navigation