Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A life-prediction method for lithium-ion batteries based on a fusion model and an attention mechanism

  • Published:
Optoelectronics Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current life-prediction models for lithium-ion batteries have several problems, such as the construction of complex feature structures, a high number of feature dimensions, and inaccurate prediction results. To overcome these problems, this paper proposes a deep-learning model combining an autoencoder network and a long short-term memory network. First, this model applies the characteristics of the autoencoder to reduce the dimensionality of the high-dimensional features extracted from the battery data set and realize the fusion of complex time-domain features, which overcomes the problems of redundant model information and low computational efficiency. This model then uses a long short-term memory network that is sensitive to time-series data to solve the long-path dependence problem in the prediction of battery life. Lastly, the attention mechanism is used to give greater weight to features that have a greater impact on the target value, which enhances the learning effect of the model on the long input sequence. To verify the efficacy of the proposed model, this paper uses NASA’s lithium-ion battery cycle life data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Jingliang Zhang and Jay Lee, Journal of Power Sources 196, 6007 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei He, Nicholas Williard, Michael Osterman and Michael Pecht, Journal of Power Sources 196, 10314 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Xiaosong Hu, Changfu Zou, Caiping Zhang and Yang Li, IEEE Power Energy Magazine 15, 20 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Datong, Zhou Jianbao and Guo Limeng, Journal of Instrumentation 36, 1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xin Xu and Nan Chen, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 159, 47 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiaosong Hu, Dongpu Cao and Bo Egardt, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 23, 161 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meru A. Patil, Piyush Tagade, Krishnan S. Hariharan, Subramanya M. Kolake, Taewon Song, Taejung Yeo and Seokgwang Doo, Applied Energy 159, 285 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WANG D, MIAO Q and PECHT M, Journal of Power Sources 239, 253 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. LIU JIE and SAXENA, An Adaptive Recurrent Nm-ion Batteries, Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 1 (2010).

  10. Rezvani Mohammad, AbuAil Mohamed, Lee Seungchul and Jay Lee, A Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Electric Vehicle Battery Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), Sae Technical Paper, 2011-01-2247.

  11. WU J, ZHANG C and CHEN Z, Applied Energy 173, 134 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. REN Lei, Sun Yaqiang, Cui Jin and Zhang Lin, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48, 71 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu Yuting, Mei Yuan, Dong Shaopeng, Lin Li and Liu Yingqi, Neurocomputing 275, 167 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ZOU H, HASTIE T and TIBSHIRANI R, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15, 265 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Md Shamim Reza and Jinwen Ma, ICA and PCA Integrated Feature Extraction for Classification, IEEE 13th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), Chengdu, China, 453 (2016).

  16. BURDA Y, GROSSE R and SALAKHUTDINOV R, Computer Science 4, 112 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Geheng, Information Technology 2, 149 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. CHOI H, CHO K and BENGIO Y, Neurocomputing 284, 171 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang Yuanyuan, Liu Zhu, Luo Hui and Wang Hui, Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument 30, 179 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Haixia and Li Kaiyong, Computer Measurement and Control 27, 271 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xian-bao Wang  (王宪保).

Additional information

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61871350), the Zhejiang Science and Technology Plan Project (No.2019C011123), and the Zhejiang Province Basic Public Welfare Research Project (No.LGG19F030011).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Xb., Wu, Ft. & Yao, Mh. A life-prediction method for lithium-ion batteries based on a fusion model and an attention mechanism. Optoelectron. Lett. 16, 410–417 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-020-9214-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-020-9214-y

Document code

Navigation