Logica Universalis

, Volume 10, Issue 2–3, pp 157–170

Disentangling Contradiction from Contrariety via Incompatibility

Article

Abstract

Contradiction is often confused with contrariety. We propose to disentangle contrariety from contradiction using the hexagon of opposition, providing a clear and distinct characterization of three notions: contrariety, contradiction, incompatibility. At the same time, this hexagonal structure describes and explains the relations between them.

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 03A05 Secondary 03B22 03B65 

Keywords

Hexagon of opposition square of opposition contradiction contrariety incompatibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker Arenhart J.R.: Liberating paraconsistency from contradiction. Log. Univ. 9, 523–544 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beziau J.-Y.: S5 is a paraconsistent logic and so is first-order classical logic. Log. Investig. 9, 301–309 (2002)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beziau J.-Y.: New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Log. Investig. 10, 218–232 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beziau, J.-Y.: Bivalent semantics for De Morgan logic (the uselessness of four-valuedness). In: Carnielli, W.A., Coniglio, M.E., D’Ottaviano, I.M.L. (eds.) The Many Sides of Logic. College Publication, London, pp. 391–402 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beziau, J.-Y.: The new rising of the square. In: Beziau, J.-Y., Jacquette, D. (eds.) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser, Basel (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beziau J.-Y.: The power of the hexagon. Log. Univ. 6, 1–43 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beziau J.-Y.: The metalogical hexagon of opposition. Argumentos 10, 111–122 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beziau, J.-Y.: Round squares are no contradictions. In: Beziau, J.-Y., Chakraborty, M., Dutta, S. (eds.) New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic. Springer, New Delhi, pp. 39–55 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beziau, J.-Y.: Le possible et l’impossible: au-delà de la dichotomie. In: Actes du 35ème Congrès de l’ASPLF—Association des Sociétés de Philosophie de Langue Française. Vrin, Paris, pp. 33–54 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beziau, J.-Y.: Possibility, imagination and conception. Principios 23 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beziau, J.-Y., Jacquette, D. (eds.) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser, Basel (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beziau, J.-Y., Payette, G. (eds.): Special Issue on the Square of Opposition. Log. Univ. Number 1, 2 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beziau, J.-Y.: History of the concept of truth-value. In: Gabbay, D.M., Pelletier, F.J., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 233–305 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beziau, J.-Y., Payette, G. (eds.) :The Square of Opposition—A General Framework for Cognition. Peter Lang, Bern (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beziau, J.-Y. (ed.): Special Issue of Logica Universalis Dedicated to the Hexagon of Opposition, vol. 6, double issue 1–2 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beziau, J.-Y., Read, S.: Square of opposition: a diagram and a theory in historical perspective. Preface of a Special Issue of History and Philosophy of Logic on the Square of Opposition, vol. 4, pp. 315–316 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beziau, J.-Y., Gan-Krzywoszyńska, K. (eds.): The Many Dimensions of the Square of Opposition. Philosophia, Munich (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beziau, J.-Y., Basti, G. (eds.): The Square of Opposition. A Cornerstone for Thought. Birkhäuser, Basel (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blanché R.: Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind 61, 369–375 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blanché R.: Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19, 89–130 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blanché R.: Opposition et négation. Revue Philos. 167, 187–216 (1957)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blanché R.: Structures Intellectuelles. Essai sur l’Organisation Systématique des Concepts. Vrin, Paris (1966)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bréal M.: Essai de Sémantique: Science des Significations. Hachette, Paris (1897)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Correia, M.: The proto-exposition of Aristotelian categorical logic. In: [18]Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dewar, R.: Les panneaux de signalisation, In: Beziau, J.-Y. (eds.) La Pointure du Symbole. Petra, Paris, pp. 58–77 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamilton, W.: Lectures on Logic, vol. 1. Blackwood, Edinburgh (1860)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoeksema, J.: Blocking Effects and Polarity Sensitivity. In: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of His 50th Birthday. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horn L.R.: A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Horn, L.R.: Histoire d’*O.: lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In:[14], pp. 393–426Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horn, L.R.: On the Contrary: Disjunctive Syllogism and Pragmatic Strengthening, In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds.) The Road to Universal Logic—Festschrift for 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau, vol. I. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 241–265 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jaspers D.: Logic and colour. Log. Univ. 6, 227–248 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jespersen, O.: Negation in English and Other Languages. A.F. Host & Son, Copenhagen (1917)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lachance, G.: Platonic Contrariety (enantia): Ancestor of the Aristotelian Notion of Contradiction (antiphasis)? Log. Univ. 10, 1–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lemaire, J.: Is Aristotle the father of the square of opposition? In: [17]Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Londey, D., Johanson, C.: The logic of Apuleius—including a complete Latin text and English translation of the Peri Hemeneias of Apuleius of Madaura. E. J. Brill (1987)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moretti, A.: The geometry of logical opposition. Ph.D. thesis directed by J.-Y. Beziau. University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seuren P.M.: The Logic of Language—Language from Within. vol.II. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sullivan, M.W.: Apuleian Logic. The Nature, Sources, and Influence of Apuleius’s Peri Hermeneias. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tarski A.: The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 4, 341–376 (1944)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vasiliev, N.: On partial judgements, the triangle of opposites and the law of excluded fourth (in Russian). Scientific papers of Kazan University, Kazan (1910)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNPq, Brazilian Research CouncilUFRJ, University of BrazilRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations