Logica Universalis

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 43–58 | Cite as

Ploucquet’s “Refutation” of the Traditional Square of Opposition

Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract.

In the 18th century, Gottfried Ploucquet developed a new syllogistic logic where the categorical forms are interpreted as set-theoretical identities, or diversities, between the full extension, or a non-empty part of the extension, of the subject and the predicate. With the help of two operators ‘O’ (for “Omne”) and ‘Q’ (for “Quoddam”), the UA and PA are represented as ‘O(S) – Q(P)’ and ‘Q(S) – Q(P)’, respectively, while UN and PN take the form ‘O(S) > O(P)’ and ‘Q(S) > O(P)’, where ‘>’ denotes set-theoretical disjointness. The use of the symmetric operators ‘–’ and ‘>’ gave rise to a new conception of conversion which in turn lead Ploucquet to consider also the unorthodox propositions O(S) – O(P), Q(S) – O(P), O(S) > Q(P), and Q(S) > Q(P). Although Ploucquet’s critique of the traditional theory of opposition turns out to be mistaken, his theory of the “Quantification of the Predicate” is basically sound and involves an interesting “Double Square of Opposition”.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000).

03A05 03B65 

Keywords.

Syllogistic logic quantification of the predicate Ploucquet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Birkhaeuser 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations