Skip to main content
Log in

The coupling of sand with ZVI/oxidants achieved proportional and highly efficient removal of arsenic

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coupling of zero-valent iron (ZVI) with common oxidants has recently achieved very rapid and highly efficient removal of Heavy metals from wastewater. However, the uniform activation of ZVI throughout the column and the proportional removal of target contaminants are urgently required for the prevention of premature filter clogging and the extension of the effective column operational time. In this study, we successfully achieved this objective by simply doping granular sand with ZVI at appropriate weight ratios. When pure ZVI packed column was spiked with oxidants, the majority of As trapping occurred between the column inlet and the first sampling point. In a packed column with a 1:20 mixture of ZVI and sand, the average As removal efficiency was 36 (1st), 13.1 (2nd), 18.5 (3rd), 19.2 (4th) and 5.9% (5th outlet). The overall arsenic removal performance of the composite filling system of ZVI/sand was equally as efficient as that of the previous pure ZVI-packed system. Moreover, the leaching of Fe was significantly reduced with an increased sand ratio, resulting in clearer water with less turbidity. The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) demonstrated that more than 54% of the arsenic was reduced to As(III). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the extensive corrosion of the ZVI surface, which resulted in various species of iron oxyhydroxides responsible for the highly efficient sequester of arsenic through reduction, adsorption, and coprecipitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen G (2004). Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 38(1): 11–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski A, Hubicki Z, Podkościelny P, Robens E (2004). Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrialwaste-waters by ion-exchange method. Chemosphere, 56(2): 91–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Klerk R J, Jia Y, Daenzer R, Gomez M A, Demopoulos G P (2012). Continuous circuit coprecipitation of arsenic(V) with ferric iron by lime neutralization: Process parameter effects on arsenic removal and precipitate quality. Hydrometallurgy, 111–112: 65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding C, Cheng W, Sun Y, Wang X (2015). Effects of Bacillus subtilis on the reduction of U(VI) by nano-Fe0. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 165: 86–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan X, Sun Y, Qin H, Li J, Lo I M, He D, Dong H (2015). The limitations of applying zero-valent iron technology in contaminants sequestration and the corresponding countermeasures: The development in zero-valent iron technology in the last two decades (1994–2014). Water Research, 75: 224–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Yang Z (2014). A method to rapidly remove the heavy metals from water. CN104276646A, PA

  • Guo X, Yang Z, Dong H, Guan X, Ren Q, Lv X, Jin X (2016). Simple combination of oxidants with zero-valent-iron (ZVI) achieved very rapid and highly efficient removal of heavy metals from water. Water Research, 88: 671–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Yang Z, Jin X (2014). A method to remove nitrate from water by ZVI/oxidants/zeolite. CN104341055A

  • Guo X, Yang Z, Liu H, Lv X, Tu Q, Ren Q, Xia X, Jing C (2015). Common oxidants activate the reactivity of zero-valent iron (ZVI) and hence remarkably enhance nitrate reduction from water. Separation and Purification Technology, 146: 227–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaliwon B F I (2015). A study on artificial hexavalent chromium removal by using zero valent iron reactor and sand filter in electrochemical reduction process. In: InCIEC 2014 (pp. 1003–1009). Singapore: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanel S R, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H (2005). Removal of arsenic (III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(5): 1291–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y H, Ko S O, Yoo H C (2002). Simultaneous removal of tetrachlorocarbon and chromium (VI) using zero valent iron. Journal-Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 24(11): 1949–1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackovic J A, Nikolaidis N P, Dobbs G M (2000). Inorganic arsenic removal by zero-valent iron. Environmental Engineering Science, 17(1): 29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Guo X, Dong H, Luo X, Guan X, Zhang X, Xia X (2018). Selenite removal from groundwater by zero-valent iron (ZVI) in combination with oxidants. Chemical Engineering Journal, 345: 432–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Guan X, Shi Z, Li J, Wu Y, Tratnyek P G (2014). Coupled effects of aging and weak magnetic fields on sequestration of selenite by zero-valent iron. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(11): 6326–6334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo H, Jin S, Fallgren P H, Colberg P J, Johnson P A (2010). Prevention of iron passivation and enhancement of nitrate reduction by electron supplementation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 160(1): 185–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matlock M M, Howerton B S, Atwood D A (2002). Chemical precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage. Water Research, 36(19): 4757–4764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal P, Bhowmick S, Jullok N, Ye W, Van Renterghem W, Van den Berghe S, Van der Bruggen B (2014). Behavior of As(V) with ZVI-H2O system and the reduction to As(0). Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 118(37): 21614–21621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidis N P, Dobbs G M, Lackovic J A (2003). Arsenic removal by zero-valent iron: Field, laboratory and modeling studies. Water Research, 37(6): 1417–1425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noubactep C (2010). Metallic iron for safe drinking water worldwide. Chemical Engineering Journal, 165(2): 740–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noubactep C (2015). Metallic iron for environmental remediation: A review of reviews. Water Research, 85: 114–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noubactep C, Caré S (2011). Designing laboratory metallic iron columns for better result comparability. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 189(3): 809–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Carroll D, Sleep B, Krol M, Boparai H, Kocur C (2013). Nanoscale zero-valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation. Advances in Water Resources, 51: 104–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Xi B, Zhao Y, Shi Q, Meng X, Mao X, Jiang Y, Ma Z, Tan W, Liu H, Gong B (2017). Effect of arsenic on the formation and adsorption property of ferric hydroxide precipitates in ZVI treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(17): 10100–10108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers R M (1980). Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen peroxide using potassium titanium(IV) oxalate. Analyst (London), 105(1255): 950–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sleiman N, Deluchat V, Wazne M, Mallet M, Courtin-Nomade A, Kazpard V, Baudu M (2016). Phosphate removal from aqueous solution using ZVI/sand bed reactor: Behavior and mechanism. Water Research, 99: 56–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun F, Osseo-Asare K A, Chen Y, Dempsey B A (2011). Reduction of As(V) to As(III) by commercial ZVI or As(0) with acid-treated ZVI. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 196: 311–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li J, Huang T, Guan X (2016). The influences of iron characteristics, operating conditions and solution chemistry on contaminants removal by zero-valent iron: A review. Water Research, 100: 277–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff P, James J (2003). Nitrate removal in zero-valent iron packed columns. Water Research, 37(8): 1818–1830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie M, Shon H K, Gray S R, Elimelech M (2016). Membrane-based processes for wastewater nutrient recovery: Technology, challenges, and future direction. Water Research, 89: 210–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Shan C, Zhang W, Jiang Z, Guan X, Pan B (2016). Temporospatial evolution and removal mechanisms of As(V) and Se(VI) in ZVI column with H2O2 as corrosion accelerator. Water Research, 106: 461–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B W, Lim T T (2007). Catalytic reduction of chlorobenzenes with Pd/Fe nanoparticles: Reactive sites, catalyst stability, particle aging, and regeneration. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(21): 7523–7529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu F, Ma S, Liu T, Deng X (2018). Green synthesis of nano zero-valent iron/Cu by green tea to remove hexavalent chromium from groundwater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174: 184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Jia Y, Wu X, Wang H (2009). Removal of arsenic from water by supported nano zero-valent iron on activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(2–3): 1591–1596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors greatly acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21876011), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0605001), and Fund for Innovative Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51721093).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuejun Guo.

Additional information

Highlights

• Simply doping sands with ZVI achieved an even activation of ZVI by oxidants.

• Sand doping facilitated proportional As trapping along the ZVI/oxidants column.

• ZVI/sand/oxidants are highly efficient for arsenic removal.

• ZVI/sand/oxidants reduced significantly the Fe2+ leaching and effluent turbidity.

• More than 54% of arsenic was reduced to As(III) in ZVI/sand/oxidants system.

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, S., Guo, X., Luo, X. et al. The coupling of sand with ZVI/oxidants achieved proportional and highly efficient removal of arsenic. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 14, 94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1273-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1273-6

Keywords

Navigation