Skip to main content
Log in

Metallic wastewater treatment by sulfate reduction using anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor under high metal loading conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was aimed at investigating the performance of anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor treating synthetic wastewater containing a mixture of heavy metals under sulfate reducing condition. Statistically valid factorial design of experiments was carried out to understand the dynamics of metal removal using this bioreactor system. Copper removal was maximum (>98%), followed by other heavy metals at their respective low inlet concentrations. Metal loading rates less than 3.7 mg/L∙h in case of Cu(II); less than 1.69 mg/L∙h for Ni(II), Pb(II), Zn(II), Fe(III) and Cd(II) are favorable to the performance of the An-RBC reactor. Removal efficiency of the heavy metals from mixture depended on the metal species and their inlet loading concentrations. Analysis of metal precipitates formed in the sulfidogenic bioreactor by field emission scanning electron microscopy along with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FESEM-EDX) confirmed metal sulfide precipitation by SRB. All these results clearly revealed that the attached growth biofilm bioreactor is well suited for heavy metal removal from complex mixture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American WaterWorks Association (AWWA) &Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington D.C.

  • Bai H J, Zhang Z M, Yang G E, Li B Z (2008). Bioremediation of cadmium by growing Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Kinetic characteristic and mechanism studies. Bioresource Technology, 99(16): 7716–7722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brahmacharimayum B, Ghosh P K (2014). Sulfate bioreduction and elemental sulfur formation in a packed bed reactor. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2(3): 1287–1293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Li Y, Zhang G, Yang C, Cao X (2013). Effect of Fe(III) on the biotreatment of bioleaching solutions using sulfate-reducing bacteria. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 125: 27–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C Y, Lin K C, Yang D T (1997). Comparison of the relative toxicity relationships based on batch and continuous algal toxicity tests. Chemosphere, 35(9): 1959–1965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cord-Ruwisch R (1985). A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 4(1): 33–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dev S, Roy S, Bhattacharya J (2016). Understanding the performance of sulfate reducing bacteria based packed bed reactor by growth kinetics study and microbial profiling. Journal of Environmental Management, 177: 101–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dev S, Roy S, Bhattacharya J (2017). Optimization of the operation of packed bed bioreactor to improve the sulfate and metal removal from acid mine drainage. Journal of Environmental Management, 200: 135–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gikas P (2007). Kinetic responses of activated sludge to individual and joint nickel (Ni(II)) and cobalt (Co(II)): An isobolographic approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 143(1-2): 246–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Kang Y, Feng Y (2017). Bioassessment of heavy metal toxicity and enhancement of heavy metal removal by sulfate-reducing bacteria in the presence of zero valent iron. Journal of Environmental Management, 203(Pt 1): 278–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J W, Petrucci R H, McCreary T W, Perry S S (2005). General Chemistry. 4th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Chandran K, Grasso D, Smets B F (2004). Comparison of nitrification inhibition by metals in batch and continuous flow reactors. Water Research, 38(18): 3949–3959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Rodríguez A M, Durán-Barrantes M M, Borja R, Sánchez E, ColmenarejoMF, Raposo F (2009). Heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage water using biogenic hydrogen sulphide and effluent from anaerobic treatment: Effect of pH. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165(1-3): 759–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin S, Drever J I, Colberg P J (2007). Effects of copper on sulfate reduction in bacterial consortia enriched from metal-contaminated and uncontaminated sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 26(2): 225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaksonen A H, Puhakka J A (2007). Sulfate reduction based bioprocesses for the treatment of acid mine drainage and the recovery of metals. Engineering in Life Sciences, 7(6): 541–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieu H T Q, Müller E, Horn H (2011). Heavy metal removal in anaerobic semi-continuous stirred tank reactors by a consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Water Research, 45(13): 3863–3870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiran M G, Pakshirajan K, Das G (2016). Heavy metal removal using sulfate reducing biomass obtained from a lab scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 142(9): C4015010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiran M G, Pakshirajan K, Das G (2017a). A new application of anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor for heavy metal removal under sulfate reducing condition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 321: 67–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiran M G, Pakshirajan K, Das G (2017b). Heavy metal removal from multicomponent system by sulfate reducing bacteria: Mechanism and cell surface characterization. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 324 (Part A): 62–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lens P N L, van den Bosch M C, Hulshoff Pol L W, Lettinga G (1998). Effect of staging on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulfidogenic granular sludge reactor. Water Research, 32(4): 1178–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madamba P S, Liboon F A (2001). Optimization of the vacuum dehydration of celery (Apium graveolens) using the response surface methodology. Drying Technology, 19(3-4): 611–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Min X, Chai L, Zhang C, Takasaki Y, Okura T (2008). Control of metal toxicity, effluent COD and regeneration of gel beads by immobilized sulfate-reducing bacteria. Chemosphere, 72(7): 1086–1091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D C (2004). Design and analysis of experiments, 7th ed. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagpal S, Chuichulcherm S, Livingston A, Peeva L (2000). Ethanol utilization by sulfate-reducing bacteria: an experimental and modeling study. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 70(5): 533–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omil F, Lens P, Hulshoff Pol L, Lettinga G (1996). Effect of upward velocity and sulphide concentration on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulphidogenic granular sludge reactor. Process Biochemistry, 31 (7): 699–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pakshirajan K, Kheria S (2012). Continuous treatment of coloured industry wastewater using immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium in a rotating biological contactor reactor. Journal of Environmental Management, 101: 118–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postgate J R (1984). The Sulphate-reducing Bacteria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinzema A, Lettinga G (1998). Anaerobic treatment of sulfate containing wastewater. In: Biotreatment Systems, 3: (Wise, DL, Ed). Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc., 65–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Lora M A, Brennan R A (2009). Efficient metal removal and neutralization of acid mine drainage by crab-shell chitin under batch and continuous-flow conditions. Bioresource Technology, 100(21): 5063–5071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saifullah, Meers E, Qadir M, de Caritat P, Tack F M, Du Laing G, Zia M H (2009). EDTA-assisted Pb phytoextraction. Chemosphere, 74: 1279–1291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sema S S, Gikas P, James G M, Brent M P, Timothy R G (2012). Comparison of single and joint effects of Zn and Cu in continuous flow and batch reactors. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 87(3): 374–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sen M, Dastidar M G, Roy Choudhury P K (2007). Biological removal of Cr(VI) using Fusarium solani in batch and continuous modes of operation. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41(1-2): 51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teclu D, Tivchev G, Laing M, Wallis M (2009). Determination of the elemental composition of molasses and its suitability as carbon source for growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(2-3): 1157–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Utgikar V P, Chaudhary N, Koeniger A, Tabak H H, Haines J R, Govind R (2004). Toxicity of metals and metal mixtures: Analysis of concentration and time dependence for zinc and copper. Water Research, 38(17): 3651–3658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco A, Ramírez M, Volke-Sepúlveda T, González-Sánchez A, Revah S (2008). Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151(2-3): 407–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villa-Gomez D K, Pakshirajan K, Maestro R, Mushi S, Lens P N L (2015). Effect of process variables on the sulfate reduction process in bioreactors treating metal-containing wastewaters: Factorial design and response surface analyses. Biodegradation, 26(4): 299–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, LampiMA, Huang X D, Gerhardt K, Dixon D G, Greenberg B M (2009). Assessment of mixture toxicity of copper, cadmium, and phenanthrenequinone to the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri. Environmental Toxicology, 24(2): 166–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widdel F (1998). Microbiology and ecology of sulfate-and sulfurreducing bacteria. In: Zehnder A, ed. Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Wang H (2016). Preparation of immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) granules for effective bioremediation of acid mine drainage and bacterial community analysis. Minerals Engineering, 92: 63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Wang H, Han X (2016). Preparation of metal-resistant immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria beads for acid mine drainage treatment. Chemosphere, 154: 215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge Centre for the Environment, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India, for providing the facilities to carry out the reactor studies and the Central Instruments Facility, IIT Guwahati, Assam, India, for FESEM-EDX analysis of the samples. Authors also thank Mr. Partha Protim Bakal for his help with heavy metal analysis

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kannan Pakshirajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiran, M.G., Pakshirajan, K. & Das, G. Metallic wastewater treatment by sulfate reduction using anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor under high metal loading conditions. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12, 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1073-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1073-4

Keywords

Navigation