Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of placement angles on wireless electrocoagulation for bipolar aluminum electrodes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We in our previous study reported the wireless electrocoagulation (WEC) based on bipolar electrochemistry for water purification. One of the most important advantages of WEC is the omission of ohmic connection between bipolar electrode (BPE) and power supply, and thus the electrochemical reactions on BPE are driven by electric field in solution induced by driving electrodes. In this study, the impact of placement angle of bipolar aluminum electrode on WEC was investigated to provide a detailed analysis on the correlations between the bipolar electrode placement angle and bipolar electrocoagulation reactions. The results showed that the WEC cell with a horizontal BPE placed at 0° produced the maximum dissolved aluminum coagulant, accounting for 71.6 % higher than that with a vertical one placed at 90°. Moreover, the finite element simulations of current and potential distribution were carried out along the surface of BPE at different placement angles, revealing the mechanism of different BPE placement angles on aluminum dissolution rates in WEC system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mollah M Y, Schennach R, Parga J R, Cocke D L. Electrocoagulation (EC)-science and applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 84(1): 29–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mollah M Y A, Morkovsky P, Gomes J A G, Kesmez M, Parga J, Cocke D. Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 114(1–3): 199–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma A K, Dash R R, Bhunia P. A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 93(1): 154–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu J, Yu H T, Quan X, Chen S. Covering α-Fe2O3 protection layer on the surface of p-Si micropillar array for enhanced photoelectrochemical performance. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2017, 11(6): 13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0957-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei X N, Guo S H, Wu B, Li F M, Li G. Effects of reducing agent and approaching anodes on chromium removal in electrokinetic soil remediation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 253–261https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0791-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sahu O, Mazumdar B, Chaudhari P K. Treatment of wastewater by electrocoagulation: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2014, 21(4): 2397–2413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erb U, Gleiter H, Schwitzgebel G. The effect of boundary structure (energy) on interfacial corrosion. Acta Metallurgica, 1982, 30(7): 1377–1380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Qi Z, You S, Ren N. Wireless electrocoagulation in water treatment based on bipolar electrochemistry. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 229 (1): 96–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bayramoglu M, Eyvaz M, Kobya M. Treatment of the textile wastewater by electrocoagulation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 128(2–3): 155–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobya M, Bayramoglu M, Eyvaz M. Techno-economical evaluation of electrocoagulation for the textile wastewater using different electrode connections. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 148 (1–2): 311–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mameri N, Yeddou A R, Lounici H, Belhocine D, Grib H, Bariou B. Defluoridation of septentrional Sahara water of north Africa by electrocoagulation process using bipolar aluminium electrodes. Water Research, 1998, 32(5): 1604–1612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mameri N, Lounici H, Belhocine D, Grib H, Piron D L, Yahiat Y. Defluoridation of Sahara water by small plant electrocoagulation using bipolar aluminium electrodes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2001, 24(1–2): 113–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosh D, Medhi C R, Purkait MK. Treatment of fluoride containing drinking water by electrocoagulation using monopolar and bipolar electrode connections. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(9): 1393–1400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Demirci Y, Pekel L C, Alpbaz M. Investigation of different electrode connections in electrocoagulation of textile wastewater treatment. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2015, 10(3): 2685–2693

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Naje A S, Chelliapan S, Zakaria Z. Treatment performance of textile wastewater using electrocoagulation (EC) process under combined electrical connection of electrodes. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2015, 10(7): 5924–5941

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu C Y, Lo S L, Kuan W H. Effects of co-existing anions on fluoride removal in electrocoagulation (EC) process using aluminum electrodes. Water Research, 2003, 37(18): 4513–4523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Daneshvar N, Ashassi Sorkhabi H, Kasiri M B. Decolorization of dye solution containing Acid Red 14 by electrocoagulation with a comparative investigation of different electrode connections. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 112(1–2): 55–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Modirshahla N, Behnajady M A, Mohammadi-Aghdam S. Investigation of the effect of different electrodes and their connections on the removal efficiency of 4-nitrophenol from aqueous solution by electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 154(1–3): 778–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duval J, Kleijn J M, van Leeuwen H P. Bipolar electrode behaviour of the aluminium surface in a lateral electric field. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2001, 505(1–2): 1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Duval J F L, Buffle J, van Leeuwen H P. Quasi-reversible faradaic depolarization processes in the electrokinetics of the metal/solution interface. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(12): 6081–6094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cañizares P, Jiménez C, Martínez F, Sáez C, Rodrigo MA. Study of the electrocoagulation process using aluminum and iron electrodes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(19): 6189–6195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen X, Chen G, Yue P L. Separation of pollutants from restaurant wastewater by electrocoagulation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2000, 19(1–2): 65–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakshmanan D, Clifford D A, Samanta G. Ferrous and ferric ion generation during iron electrocoagulation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(10): 3853–3859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van Genuchten C M, Bandaru S R S, Surorova E, Amrose S E, Gadgil A J, Peña J. Formation of macroscopic surface layers on Fe (0) electrocoagulation electrodes during an extended field trial of arsenic treatment. Chemosphere, 2016, 153(3): 270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Llanos J, Cotillas S, Cañizares P, Rodrigo M A. Effect of bipolar electrode material on the reclamation of urban wastewater by an integrated electrodisinfection/electrocoagulation process. Water Research, 2014, 53(1): 329–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Greenberg A E, Trussell R R, Clesceri L S. Standard Methods for the Examination ofWater andWastewater: Supplement to the Sixteenth Edition. Washington, D. C: American Public Health Association, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fosdick S E, Crooks J A, Chang B Y, Crooks R M. Twodimensional bipolar electrochemistry. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(27): 9226–9227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mansouri K, Ibrik K, Bensalah N, Abdel-Wahab A. Anodic dissolution of pure aluminum during electrocoagulation process: Influence of supporting electrolyte, initial pH, and current density. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(23): 13362–13372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mavré F, Chow K F, Sheridan E, Chang B Y, Crooks J A, Crooks R M. A theoretical and experimental framework for understanding electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) emission at bipolar electrodes. Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 81(15): 6218–6225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Krabbenborg S O, Huskens J. Electrochemically generated gradients. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53 (35): 9152–9167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan S, Shannon C. Electrochemiluminescence quenching by halide ions at bipolar electrodes. Electroanalysis, 2016, 28(3): 533–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kayran Y U, Eßmann V, Grützke S, Schuhmann W. Selection of highly Sers-active nanostructures from a size gradient of Au nanovoids on a single bipolar electrode. ChemElectroChem, 2016, 3 (3): 399–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen T S, Lind J U, Daugaard A E, Hvilsted S, Andresen T L, Larsen N B. Complex surface concentration gradients by stenciled. Electro Click Chemistry. Langmuir, 2010, 26(20): 16171–16177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pébère N, Vivier V. Local electrochemical measurements in bipolar experiments for corrosion studies. ChemElectroChem, 2016, 3(3): 415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuokkanen V, Kuokkanen T, Rämö J, Lassi U. Recent applications of electrocoagulation in treatment of water and wastewater-A review. Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2013, 3(2): 89–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vidal J, Villegas L, Peralta-Hernandez J M, Salazar González R. Removal of acid black 194 dye from water by electrocoagulation with aluminum anode. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 2016, 51(4): 289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Keddam M, Nóvoa X R, Vivier V. The concept of floating electrode for contact-less electrochemical measurements: Application to reinforcing steel-bar corrosion in concrete. Corrosion Science, 2009, 51(8): 1795–1801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Eßmann V, Clausmeyer J, Schuhmann W. Alternating currentbipolar electrochemistry. Electrochemistry Communications, 2017, 75(6): 82–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dubey P K, Sinha A S K, Talapatra S, Koratkar N, Ajayan P M, Srivastava O N. Hydrogen generation by water electrolysis using carbon nanotube anode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(9): 3945–3950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bouffier L, Arbault S, Kuhn A, Sojic N. Generation of electrochemiluminescence at bipolar electrodes: Concepts and applications. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2016, 408 (25): 7003–7011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678184), State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (No. 2017DX12), HIT Environment and Ecology Innovation Special Funds (HSCJ201610).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shijie You.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, Z., Zhang, J. & You, S. Effect of placement angles on wireless electrocoagulation for bipolar aluminum electrodes. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12, 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1034-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1034-y

Keywords