Photolysis and photooxidation of typical gaseous VOCs by UV Irradiation: Removal performance and mechanisms

  • In-Sun Kang
  • Jinying Xi
  • Hong-Ying Hu
Research Article


Photodegradation by ultraviolet irradiation (UV) is increasingly applied in volatile organic compound (VOC) and odor gas treatments. In this study, 27 typical VOCs, including 11 hydrocarbons and 16 hydrocarbon derivatives, at 150–200 ppm in air and nitrogen gas were treated by a laboratory-scale UV reactor with 185/254 nm irradiation to systematically investigate their removal and conversion by UV irradiation. For the tested 27 VOCs, the VOC removal efficiencies in air were within the range of 13%–97% (with an average of 80%) at a retention time of 53 s, which showed a moderate positive correlation with the molecular weight of the VOCs (R = 0.53). The respective contributions of photolysis and photooxidation to VOC removal were identified for each VOC. According to the CO2 results, the mineralization rate of the tested VOCs was within the range of 9%–90%, with an average of 41% and were negatively correlated to the molecular weight (R = −0.63). Many of the tested VOCs exhibited high concentration particulate matters in the off-gases with a 3–283 mg/m3 PM10 range and a 2–40 mg/m3 PM2.5 range. The carbon balance of each VOC during UVirradiation was analyzed based on the VOC, CO2 and PM10 concentrations. Certain organic intermediates and 23–218 ppm ozone were also identified in the off-gases. Although the UV technique exhibited a high VOC removal efficiency, its drawbacks, specifically low mineralization, particulate matters production, and ozone emission, must be considered prior to its application in VOC gas treatments.


VOCs UV photodegradation Particulate matters Ozone 



This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.51378286) and the Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control (No. 2011ZX07301-003). We thank LetPub ( for providing linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Duan H, Liu X, Yan M, Wu Y, Liu Z. Characteristics of carbonyls and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in residences in Beijing, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Niu H, Mo Z, Shao M, Lu S, Xie S. Screening the emission sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in China by multi-effects evaluation. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao P, Zhu L. Optimized porous clay heterostructure for removal of acetaldehyde and toluene from indoor air. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qiao N, Zhang X, He C, Li Y, Zhang Z, Cheng J, Hao Z. Enhanced performances in catalytic oxidation of o-xylene over hierarchical macro-/mesoporous silica-supported palladium catalysts. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berenjian A, Chan N, Malmiri H J. Volatile organic compounds removal methods: A review. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2012, 8(4): 220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parmar G R, Rao N N. Emerging control technologies for volatile organic compounds. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 39(1): 41–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wekhof A. Treatment of contaminated water, air and soil with UV flash lamps. Environment and Progress, 1991, 10(4): 241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhowmick M, Semmens M J. Ultraviolet photooxidation for the destruction of VOCs in air. Water Research, 1994, 28(11): 2407–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hay S O, Obee T, Luo Z, Jiang T, Meng Y, He J, Murphy S C, Suib S. The viability of photocatalysis for air purification. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2015, 20(1): 1319–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    George C, Beeldens A, Barmpas F, Doussin J F, Manganelli G, Herrmann H, Kleffmann J, Mellouki A. Impact of photocatalytic remediation of pollutants on urban air quality. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang J H, Ray M B. Application of ultraviolet photooxidation to remove organic pollutants in the gas phase. Separation and Purification Technology, 2000, 19(1–2): 11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang I S, Xi J Y, Hu H Y. Effects of different operating conditions on the VOCs removal performance of UV irradiation reactors. Journal of Odor and Indoor Environment, 2017, 16(1): 72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feiyan C, Pehkonen S O, Ray M B. Kinetics and mechanisms of UV-photodegradation of chlorinated organics in the gas phase. Water Research, 2002, 36(17): 4203–4214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu J, Cai W, Chen J, Feng L, Jiang Y, Cheng Z. Conversion characteristics and mechanism analysis of gaseous dichloromethane degraded by a VUV light in different reaction media. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2012, 24(10): 1777–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shen Y S, Ku Y. Treatment of gas-phase volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by the UV/O3 process. Chemosphere, 1999, 38(8): 1855–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chou M S, Chang K L. UV/ozone degradation of gaseous hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS). Chemosphere, 2007, 69(5): 697–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahmoudkhani F, Rezaei M, Asili V, Atyabi M, Vaisman E, Langford C H, De Visscher A. Benzene degradation in waste gas by photolysis and photolysis-ozonation: experiments and modeling. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(6): 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cheng Z W, Sun P F, Jiang Y F, Yu J M, Chen J M. Ozone-assisted UV254 nm photodegradation of gaseous ethylbenzene and chlorobenzene: Effects of process parameters, degradation pathways, and kinetic analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 228 (3): 1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koh L H, Kuhn C S, Mohseni M, Allen D G. Utilizing ultraviolet Photolysis as a pre-treatment of volatile organic compounds upstream of a biological gas cleaning operation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2004, 79(6): 619–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang C, Xi J Y, Hu H Y, Yao Y. Advantages of combined UV photodegradation and biofiltration processes to treat gaseous chlorobenzene. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 171(1–3): 1120–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Braslavskys S E. Glossary of terms used in photochemistry, 3rd ed. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2007, 79(3): 293–465Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kang I S, Xi J Y, Wang C, Hu H Y. UV Photodegradation of chlorinated VOCs: Removal efficiency and products. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 33(2): 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ji J, Xu Y, Huang H, He M, Liu S, Liu G, Xie R, Feng Q, Shu Y, Zhan Y, Fang R, Ye X, Leung D Y C. Mesoporous TiO2 under VUV irradiation: Enhanced photocatalytic oxidation for VOCs degradation at room temperature. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 327: 490–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mohseni M. Gas phase trichloroethylene (TCE) photooxidation and byproduct formation: Photolysis vs. titania/silica based photocatalysis. Chemosphere, 2005, 59(3): 335–342Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang H, Huang H, Zhan Y, Liu G,Wang X, Lu H, Xiao L, Feng Q, Leung D Y C. Efficient degradation of gaseous benzene by VUV photolysis combined with ozone-assisted catalytic oxidation: Performance and mechanism. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 186: 62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jeong T S, Shin C H, Kim J S, Longzhe C. A study on the treatment of toluene and pilot test by using UV and ozone. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Technology, 2007, 8: 33–39Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holzinger R, Millet D B, Williams B, Lee A, Kreisberg N, Hering S V, Jimenez J, Allan J D, Worsnop D R, Goldstein A H. Emission, oxidation, and secondary organic aerosol formation of volatile organic compounds as observed at Chebogue Point, Nova Scotia. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007, 112(D10): D10S24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Camredon M, Aumont B, Lee-Taylor J, Madronich S. The SOA/ VOC/NOx system: An explicit model of secondary organic aerosol formation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2007, 7: 5599–5610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee S B, Bae G N, Moon K C. Smog chamber measurements. In: Kim Y J, Platt U, Gu M B, Iwahashi H, eds. Atmospheric and Biological Environmental Monitoring. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, 105–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vaden T D, Song C, Zaveri R A, Imre D, Zelenyuk A. Morphology of mixed primary and secondary organic particles and the adsorption of spectator organic gases during aerosol formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(15): 6658–6663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tie X, Madronich S, Li G H, Ying Z, Zhang R, Garcia A R, Lee-Taylor J, Liu Y. Characterizations of chemical oxidants in Mexico City: A regional chemical/dynamical model (WRF-Chem) study. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(9): 1989–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control State Key Joint Laboratory, School of EnvironmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations