Abstract
The activated sludge process to remove nitrogen and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) is reportedly cost-effective for swine wastewater treatment, and it use has thus increased in pig farming. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is generated on farms as an intermediate product in nitrification and denitrification, and methane (CH4) is also generated from organic degradation under anaerobic conditions by microorganisms in manure or wastewater. This study was carried out at five activated sludge treatment facilities across Japan between August 2014 and January 2015. Measurements were conducted over several weeks at wastewater purification facilities for swine farms: two in Chiba prefecture (East Japan), two in Okayama prefecture (West Japan), and one in Saga (Southern Japan). Taking several environmental fluctuations into account, we collected measurement data continuously day and night, during both high-temperature and low-temperature periods. The results indicated that CH4 and N2O emission factors were 0.91% (kgCH4∙kg volatile solids–1) and 2.87% (g N2O-N∙kg total N–1), respectively. Ammonia emissions were negligible in all of the measurements from the wastewater facilities. The N2O emission factor calculated under this experiment was low compared to our previous finding (5.0%; g N2O-N∙kg N–1) in a laboratory experiment. In contrast, the CH4 emission factor calculated herein was rather high compared to the laboratory measurements. There was great variation in daily GHG emission factors measured in the actual wastewater treatment facilities. In particular, the N2O emission rate was affected by several environmental conditions at each facility location, as well as by the management of the wastewater treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Tsuiki M. and Harada Y. A computer program for estimating the amount of livestock wastes. The Journal of the Japanese Agricultural Systems Society, 1997, 13(1): 17–23
Haga K. Animal waste problems and their solution from the technological point of view in Japan. Jpn Agric Res Q, 1998, 32(3): 203–210
Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Naylor R, Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002, 418(6898): 671–677
Kampschreur M J, Temmink H, Kleerebezem R, Jetten M S M, van Loosdrecht M C M. Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. Water Research, 2009, 43(17): 4093–4103
Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office of Japan, National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Japan. Ministry of the Environment, Japan, 2015URL: http://www-gio.nies.go.jp/.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. 2007 (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Stockholm). URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg1_ report_the_physical_science_basis.htm. (Accessed March 7, 2017)
Crutzen P J. Atmospheric chemical processes of the oxides of nitrogen, including nitrous oxide. In: Delwiche C C, ed. Denitrification, Nitrification and Atmospheric Nitrous Oxide. New York: John Wiley and Sons,1981, 17–44
Osada T, Kuroda K, Yonaga M. Reducing nitrous oxide gas emissions from fill-and-draw type activated sludge process. Water Research, 1995, 29(6): 1607–1608
Kampschreura M J, Temmink H, Kleerebezema R, Jettena M S M, van Loosdrecht M C M. Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment. Water Research, 2009, 43(17): 4093–4103
Osada T. Nitrous oxide emission from purification of liquid portion of swine wastewater. In: Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Sixth International Conference. Gale J, Kaya Y, eds. Oxford,2003, 1299–1304
Sherman M H. Tracer-gas techniques for measuring ventilation in a single zone. Building and Environment, 1990, 25(4): 365–374
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd edition. Rice EW, Baird R B, Eaton A D, Clesceri L S, eds. Washington D C: American Public Health Association, 2012
Minato K, Kouda Y, Yamakawa M, Hara S, Tamura T, Osada T. Determination of GHG and ammonia emissions from stored dairy cattle slurry by using a floating dynamic chamber. Animal Science Journal, 2013, 84(2): 165–177
Vanderzaag A C, Flesch T K, Desjardins R L, Balde H, Wright T. Measuring methane emissions from two dairy farms: seasonal and manure-management effects. Agricultural Meteorology, 2014, 194: 259–267
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Revised Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Reference manual, Vol. III. United Nations, New York, 1996, URL: http:// www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs6.html. (Accessed March 6, 2017)
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, eds. Published: IGES, Japan. Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management. In: Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, 2006, URL: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/. (Accessed March 6, 2017)
Osada T, Kuroda K, Yonaga M. Reducing nitrous oxide gas emissions from fill-and-draw type activated sludge process. Water Research, 1995, 29(6): 1607–1608
Yamashita T, Shiraishi M, Yamamoto-Ikemoto R, Yokoyama H, Ogino A, Osada T. Swine wastewater treatment technology to reduce nitrous oxide emission by using an aerobic bioreactor packed with carbon fibres. Animal Production Science, 2016, 56(3): 330–336
Guisasola A, de Haas D, Keller J, Yuan Z. Methane formation in sewer systems. Water Research, 2008, 42(6-7): 1421–1430
Hwang K L, Bang C H, Zoh K D. Characteristics of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from the wastewater treatment plant. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 214: 881–884
Vanderzaag A C, Gordon R J, Burton D L, Jamieson R C, Stratton G W. Greenhouse gas emissions from surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating dairy wastewater. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2010, 39(2): 460–471
Wang J, Zhang J, Xie H, Qi P, Ren Y, Hu Z. Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(9): 5479–5485
Ogink N W M, Mosquera J, Calvet S, Zhang G. Methods for measuring gas emissions from naturally ventilated livestock buildings: developments over the last decade and perspectives for improvement. Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 116(3): 297–308
Hu Z, Zhang J, Xie H, Li S, Wang J, Zhang T. Effect of anoxic/ aerobic phase fraction on N2O emission in a sequencing batch reactor under low temperature. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102 (9): 5486–5491
Paudel S R, Choi O, Khanal S K, Chandran K, Kim S, Lee J W. Effects of temperature on nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from intensive aquaculture system. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 518: 16–23
Holtan-Hartwig L, Dösch P, Bakken L R. Low temperature control of soil denitrifying communities: kinetics of N2O production and reduction. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34(11): 1797–1806
Hanaki K, Hong Z, Matsuo T. Production of nitrous oxide gas during denitrification of wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 26: 1027–1036
DaelmanMR J, van Voorthuizen EM, van Dongen U G JM, Volcke E I P, van Loosdrecht M C M. Seasonal and diurnal variability of N2O emissions from a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 536: 1–11
Acknowledgements
We express our appreciation for the financial support from the Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Japan. This study was supported by Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, via the Commissioned project study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osada, T., Shiraishi, M., Hasegawa, T. et al. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia generation in full-scale swine wastewater purification facilities. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 11, 10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0933-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0933-7