Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recovering humic substances from the dewatering effluent of thermally treated sludge and its performance as an organic fertilizer

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biologic treatment of the dewatering effluent from thermally treated sludge is difficult due to the high concentration of refractory humic substances. On the other hand, humic substances are an important source of organic fertilizer. In this study, a novel process using ferric coagulant was developed to recover humic substances from dewatering effluent for use as an organic fertilizer. When ferric coagulant was applied to raw dewatering effluent, up to 70% of humic substances were enmeshed by hydrolyzed ferric ions at an optimum pH of 4.5. The proper mass ratio of iron ions to humic substances was 0.6. In the recovered material, humic substances accounted for 24.2% of the total dry solids, and the amount of phosphorus (equivalent phosphorus pentoxide) was 6.2%. Heavy metals and other components all met the legal requirements for organic fertilizer. When the recovered material was applied to soybeans, the germination and growth of the seeds was significantly improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neyens E, Baeyens J. A review of thermal sludge pre-treatment processes to improve dewaterability. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 98(1–3): 51–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang W, Luo Y, Qiao W. Possible solutions for sludge dewatering in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2010, 4(1): 102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez-Elvira S I, Fdz-Polanco M, Fdz-Polanco F. Increasing the performance of anaerobic digestion: Pilot scale experimental study for thermal hydrolysis of mixed sludge. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering in China, 2010, 4(2): 135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng H J, Hu L F, Mahmood Q, Long Y, Shen D S. Study on biosorption of humic acid by activated sludge. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 39(3): 478–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang L, Li A. Hydrothermal treatment coupled with mechanical expression at increased temperature for excess sludge dewatering: the dewatering performance and the characteristics of products. Water Research, 2015, 68: 291–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li H, Li Y, Zou S, Li C. Extracting humic acids from digested sludge by alkaline treatment and ultrafiltration. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2014, 16(1): 93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Li A, Lu Y, Yan L, Zhong S, Deng C. Characterization and removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from landfill leachate rejected by nanofiltration. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2009, 29(3): 1035–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huo S, Xi B, Yu H, He L, Fan S, Liu H. Characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in leachate with different landfill ages. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2008, 20(4): 492–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurniawan T A, Lo W H. Removal of refractory compounds from stabilized landfill leachate using an integrated H2O2 oxidation and granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption treatment. Water Research, 2009, 43(16): 4079–4091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang F, Smith D W, Gamal El-Din M. Aged raw landfill leachate: membrane fractionation, O3 only and O3/H2O2 oxidation, and molecular size distribution analysis. Water Research, 2006, 40(3): 463–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayuso M, Moreno J L, Hernández T, Garcia C. Characterisation and evaluation of humic acids extracted from urban waste as liquid fertilisers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1997, 75 (4): 481–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kliaugait De, Yasadi K, Euverink G J, Bijmans M F M, Racys V. Electrochemical removal and recovery of humic-like substances from wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 2013, 108: 37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Li H, Li J. Variation in humic and fulvic acids during thermal sludge treatment assessed by size fractionation, elementary analysis and spectroscopic methods. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 8(6): 854–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stumm W, Morgan J J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters. New York: Wiley, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kloster N, Brigante M, Zanini G, Avena M. Aggregation kinetics of humic acids in the presence of calcium ions. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013, 427: 76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun C, Yue Q, Gao B, Mu R, Liu Y J, Zhao Z, Yang W, Xu. Effect of pH and shear force on flocs characteristics for humic acid removal using polyferric aluminum chloride–organic polymer dual-coagulants. Desalination, 2011, 281: 243–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. International Humic Substance Society (IHSS). Isolation of humic substances. Available online athttp://www.humicsubstances.org/ isolation.html (accessed December 2, 2012)

  18. Jung A V, Chanudet V, Ghanbaja J, Lartiges B S, Bersillon J L. Coagulation of humic substances and dissolved organic matter with a ferric salt: an electron energy loss spectroscopy investigation. Water Research, 2005, 39(16): 3849–3862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Z, He M, Guo X, Zhou R. Removal of antimony (III) and antimony (V) from drinking water by ferric chloride coagulation: Competing ion effect and the mechanism analysis. Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, 76(2): 184–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang H X, Stumm W. The coagulating behaviors of Fe (III) polymeric species—I. Preformed polymers by base addition. Water Research, 1987, 21(1): 115–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cathalifaud G, MossaMT W, Mazet M. Preformed ferric hydroxide flocs as adsorbents of humic substances. Water Science and Technology, 1993, 27(11): 55–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duan J, Niu A, Shi D,Wilson F, Graham N J D. Factors affecting the coagulation of seawater by ferric chloride. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2009, 11(1–3): 173–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng W P. Comparison of hydrolysis/coagulation behavior of polymeric and monomeric iron coagulants in humic acid solution. Chemosphere, 2002, 47(9): 963–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ministry of Agriculture of People’s Republic of China. Organic Fertilizer (NY525–2011). Beijing: China Standards Press, 2011 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ministry of Agriculture of People’s Republic of China. Water-Soluble Fertilizers Containing Humic-Acids (NY1106–2006). Beijing: China Standards Press, 2006 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, 518055, China

    Yuning Yang & Huan Li

Authors
  1. Yuning Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Li, H. Recovering humic substances from the dewatering effluent of thermally treated sludge and its performance as an organic fertilizer. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 10, 578–584 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0827-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-015-0827-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation