Interaction of carbonaceous nanomaterials with wastewater biomass
- 302 Downloads
Increasing production and use of carbonaceous nanomaterials (NMs) will increase their release to the sewer system and to municipal wastewater treatment plants. There is little quantitative knowledge on the removal of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), graphene oxide (GO), or few-layer graphene (FLG) from wastewater into the wastewater biomass. As such, we investigated the quantification of GO and MWCNTs by UV-Vis spectrophotometry, and FLG using programmable thermal analysis (PTA), respectively. We further explored the removal of pristine and oxidized MWCNTs (OMWCNTs), GO, and FLG in a biomass suspension. At least 96% of pristine and O-MWCNTs were removed from the water phase through aggregation and 30-min settling in presence or absence of biomass with an initial MWCNT concentration of 25 mg∙L–1. Only 65% of GO was removed with biomass concentration at or above 1,000 mg∙L–1 as total suspended solids (TSS) with the initial GO concentration of 25 mg∙L–1. As UV-Vis spectrophotometry does not work well on quantification of FLG, we studied the removal of FLG at a lower biomass concentration (50 mg TSS∙L–1) using PTA, which showed a 16% removal of FLG with an initial concentration of 1 mg∙L–1. The removal data for GO and FLG were fitted using the Freundlich equation (R 2 = 0.55, 0.94, respectively). The data presented in this study for carbonaceous NM removal from wastewater provides quantitative information for environmental exposure modeling and life cycle assessment.
Keywordsmulti-walled carbon nanotubes graphene oxide graphene removal wastewater biomass
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.U.S.EPA. Comprehensive Environmental Assessment Applied to Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Flame-Retardant Coatings in Upholstery Textiles: A Case Study Presenting Priority Research Gaps for Future Risk Assessments (Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D C: 2013Google Scholar
- 6.Clark S, Mallick G G. Global graphene market (product type, application, geography)—size, share, global trends, company profiles, demand, insights, analysis, research, report, opportunities, segmentation and forecast, 2013–2020. Allied Market Research, 2014Google Scholar
- 10.U.S.EPA. Interim Technical Guidance for Assessing Screening Level Environmental Fate and Transport of, and General Population, Consumer, and Environmental Exposure to Nanomaterials 2010. Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D C: 2011Google Scholar
- 15.Doudrick K, Nosaka T, Herckes P, Westerhoff P. Quantification of graphene and graphene oxide in complex organic matrices. Environmental Science: Nano, 2015, 2: 60–67Google Scholar
- 20.APHA. AWWA, WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water andWastewater. 21st ed. American Public Health Association (APHA), the American Water Works Association (AWWA), and the Water Environment Federation (WEF), 2005Google Scholar
- 21.Grady J L C P, Daigger G T, Lim H C. Biological Wastewater Treatment. 2nd ed. Revised and Expanded ed. Florida: CRC Press, 1999Google Scholar
- 29.Neidhardt F C. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. Washington, D C: ASM Press, 1996Google Scholar
- 35.Becker W C, Foundation A R. Using Oxidants to Enhance Filter Performance. AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association, 2004Google Scholar