Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Removal of non-point pollutants from bridge runoff by a hydrocyclone using natural water head

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hydrocyclone using natural water head provided by bridge was operated for the treatment of stormwater runoff. The hydrocyclone was automatically controlled using electronic valve which is connected to a pressure meter. Normally the hydrocyclone was open during dry days, but it was closed after the capture of the first flush. The results indicated that the average pressure and the flow rate were directly affected by the rainfall intensity. The pressure head was more than 2 m when the rainfall intensity was above 5 mm·h−1. The percentage volume of underflow with high solids concentration decreased as the pressure and flow rate increased, but the percentage volume of overflow with almost no solids showed the opposite behavior. The total suspended solids (TSS) concentration ratio between the overflow and inflow (TSSover/TSSin) decreased as a function of the operational pressure, while the corresponding ratio of underflow to inflow (TSSunder/TSSin) increased. The TSS separation efficiency was evaluated based on a mass balance. It ranged from 25% to 99% with the pressure head ranging from 1.4 to 9.7 m, and it was proportional to pressure and flow rate. Normally, the efficiency was more than 50% when the pressure was higher than 2 m. The analysis of the water budget indicated that around 13% of the total runoff was captured by the hydrocyclone as a first flush, and this runoff was separated as underflow and overflow with the respective percentage volumes of 29% and 71%. The pollutants budget was also examined based on a mass balance. The results showed that the percentage of TSS, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) in underflow were 73%, 59%, 7.6%, and 49%, respectively. Thus, it can be concluded that the hydrocyclone worked well. It separated the first flush as solids-concentrated underflow and solids-absent overflow, and effectively reduced the runoff volume needing further treatment. Finally, four types of optional post treatment design are presented and compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shutes R B E, Revitt D M, Lagerberg I M, Barraud V C. The design of vegetative constructed wetlands for the treatment of highway runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 1999, 235(1–3): 189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kayhanian M, Suverkropp C, Ruby A, Tsay K. Characterization and prediction of highway runoff constituent event mean concentration. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 85(2): 279–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Terzakis S, Fountoulakis M S, Georgaki I, Albantakis D, Sabathianakis I, Karathanasis A D, Kalogerakis N, Manios T. Constructed wetlands treating highway runoff in the central Mediterranean region. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(2): 141–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Furumai H, Balmer H, Boller M. Dynamic behavior of suspended pollutants and particle size distribution in highway runoff. Water Science & Technology 2002, 46(11–12): 413–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis J B. The contribution of highway surfaces to urban stormwater sediments and metal loadings. Science of the Total Environment, 1987, 59: 339–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sriyaraj K, Shutes R B. An assessment of the impact of motorway runoff on a pond, wetland and stream. Environment International, 2001, 26(5–6): 433–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crabtree B, Moy F, Whitehead M, Roe A. Monitoring pollutants in highway runoff. Water and Environmental Journal, 2006, 20(4): 287–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sansalone J J, Cristina C M. First flush concepts for suspended and dissolved solids in small impervious watersheds. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2004, 130(11): 1301–1314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang J H, Kayhanian M, Stenstrom MK. Predicting the existence of stormwater first flush from the time of concentration. Water Research, 2008, 42(1–2): 220–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim L H, Kayhanian M, Zoh K D, Stenstrom M K. Modeling of highway stormwater runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 2005, 348(1–3): 1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet: Hydrodynamic Hydrocyclones. EPA 835-F-99-017. Washington, USA: Office of Water, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu J, Yi Q, Kim Y, Tateda M. Analysis of hydrocyclone behaviors in the separation of particulates from highway rainfall runoff. Water Science & Technology, 2010, 62(3): 532–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Villeneuve J P, Gaume E, Michaud F. Efficiency evaluation of an installed swirl separator. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1994, 21(6): 924–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Konieek Z, Pryl K, Suchanek M. Practical applications of vortex flow separators in the Czech Republic. Water Science & Technology, 1996, 33(9): 253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andoh R Y G, Faram M G, Stephenson A G, Kane A. A novel integrated system for stormwater management. In: Novatech 2001: 4th International Conference on Innovative Technologies in Urban Storm Drainage, Lyon, France. Lyon: Novatech, 2001, 433–440

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rietema K. Performance and design of hydrocyclones-IV: design of hydrocyclones. Chemical Engineering Science, 1961, 15(3–4): 320–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed. Washington: APHA, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davis A P, McCuen R H. Stormwater Management for Smart Growth. New York: Springer, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters, EPA 841-S-00-001. Washington, USA: Office of Water, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  20. Castilho L R, Medronho R A. A simple procedure for design and performance prediction of Bradley and rietema hydrocyclones. Minerals Engineering, 2000, 13(2): 183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawson T B. Fundamentals of Aquaculture Engineering. New York: Champman & Hall, 1995

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Puprasert C, Hebrard G, Lopez L, Aurelle Y. Potential of using hydrocyclone and hydrocyclone equipped with grit pot as a pre-treatment in runoff water treatment. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2004, 43(1): 67–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China

    Jianghua Yu

  2. Department of Environmental Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan, 356706, R. O. Korea

    Yeonseok Kim & Youngchul Kim

Authors
  1. Jianghua Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yeonseok Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Youngchul Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngchul Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, J., Kim, Y. & Kim, Y. Removal of non-point pollutants from bridge runoff by a hydrocyclone using natural water head. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 7, 886–895 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0449-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0449-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation