Modeling the impact of uncertainty in emissions trading markets with bankable permits
- 143 Downloads
The various forms of uncertainty that firms may face in bankable emission permit trading markets will affect firms’ decision making as well as their market performance. This research explores the effect of increased uncertainty over future input costs and output prices on the temporal distribution of emission. In a dynamic programming setting, the permit price is a convex function of stochastic prices of coal and electricity. Increased uncertainty about future market conditions increases the expected permit price and causes a risk neutral firm to reduce ex ante emissions in order to smooth out marginal abatement costs over time. Finally, safety valves, both low-side and high-side, are suggested to reduce the impact of uncertainty in bankable emission trading markets.
Keywordsuncertainty bankable emission trading market performance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ellerman D. Designing a tradable permit system to control SO2 emissions in China: principles and practice. Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2002, 23(2): 1–26Google Scholar
- 9.Carlén B. Market power in international carbon emissions trading: a laboratory test. Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2003, 24(3): 1–26Google Scholar
- 13.Burtraw D, Szambelan S J. U.S. Emissions Trading Markets for SO2 and NOx. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 09-40. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2009Google Scholar
- 17.Linares P, JavierSantos F, Ventosa M, Lapiedra L. Impacts of the European emission trading directive and permit assignment methods on the Spanish electricity sector. Energy Journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2006, 27(1): 79–98Google Scholar
- 18.Smale R, Hartley M, Hepburn C, Ward J, Grubb M. The impacts of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy, 2006, 6(1): 31–49Google Scholar
- 20.Bunn D, Fezzi C. Interaction of European Carbon Trading and Energy Prices. FEEM Working Paper No. 63.2007. London: London Business School, 2007Google Scholar
- 24.Boutaba M A, Beaumais O, Lardic S. Permit Price Dynamics in the U.S. SO2 Trading Scheme: A Cointegration Approach. Rouen Cedex: University of Rouen, 2008Google Scholar
- 31.Rousse O, Sevi B. Behavioral heterogeneity in the U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions allowance trading program. In: Proceedings of the 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Amsterda. Amsterdam: Vrije University, 2005, 1–20Google Scholar
- 36.Stranlund J K. A Safety Valve for Emissions Trading. University of Massachusetts Amherst Department of Resource Economics Working Paper 2009-4. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2009Google Scholar
- 38.Fell H, Burtraw D, Morgenstern R, Palmer K, Preonas L. Soft and Hard Price Collars in a Cap-and-Trade System: A Comparative Analysis. Washington DC: Resource for Future, 2010Google Scholar
- 39.Stirling A. Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In: Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I, eds. Negotiating Environmental Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003, 33–76Google Scholar