Skip to main content
Log in

Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions—a case of China in 2007

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increase in international trade, more attention has been given to quantifying the impacts of international trade on energy use and carbon emissions. Input-output analysis is a suitable tool for assessing resources or pollutants embodied in trade and it has become a critical tool for performing such analysis. This study estimated the national and sectoral carbon emissions embodied in Chinese international trade using the latest available China input-output table of 2007. The results showed that a significant exporting behavior of embodied carbon emissions existed in China’s trade. Over 1/3 of the emissions in Chinese domestic production processes were generated for exports in 2007. The net balance of emissions embodied in exports and imports accounted for nearly 30% of China’s domestic emissions, which means that any policy made to increase the exports would result in a significant growth of China’s domestic emissions. Since over half of China’s export trade is processing trade, the re-exported emissions could not be overlooked; otherwise, it would hard to capture the actual emissions generated abroad to obtain China’s domestic consumption. The enlargement of export scale is a primary driven factor to the rapid growth of China’s exported emissions. It is necessary for China to adjust its economic and industrial structure to reduce the dependence of economic growth on the export trade. However, when adjusting industry structures or making policies on carbon emission reduction, it will be more reasonable to consider the relationship between production and consumption, rather than just focus on the emission values of sectors’ direct production, as a large part of carbon emissions emitted by the principal direct polluters were generated to obtain the products which were required by other sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(3): 409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wyckoff A W, Roop J M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products: implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy, 1994, 22(3): 187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science and Technology, 2008, 42(5): 1401–1407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis S J, Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(12): 5687–5692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tolmasquim M T, Machado G. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, 8(2): 139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Munksgaard J, Pedersen K A. CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Policy, 2001, 29(4): 327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastianoni S, Pulselli F M, Tiezzi E. The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 2004, 49(3): 253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters G P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(1): 13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Climatic Change, 2008b, 86(1–2): 51–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2008 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pan J H, Phillips J, Chen Y. China’s balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2008, 24(2): 354–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber C L, Peters G P, Guan D B, Hubacek K. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(9): 3572–3577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan Y F, Yang L K. China’s foreign trade and climate change: a case study of CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin B Q, Sun C W. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 613–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shui B, Harriss R C. The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18): 4063–4068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Hewitt C N. The effect of trade between China and the UK on national and global carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(6): 1907–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu M, Allenby B, Chen WQ. Energy and air emissions embodied in China-US trade: eastbound assessment using adjusted bilateral trade data. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(9): 3378–3384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei B Y, Fang X Q, Wang Y, Yang H M, Zhang D. Estimation of carbon emissions embodied in international trade for China: an input-output analysis. Journal of Beijing Normal University, 2009, 45(4): 413–419

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R. CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(18): 1999–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmad N, Wyckoff A W. Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods. OECD Publications, 2003. http://www. oecd.org/sti/working-papers

  22. Wiedmann T, Lenzen M, Turner K, Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-Part 2: review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(1): 15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1970, 52(3): 262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaeffer R, Leal de Sá A. The embodiment of carbon associated with Brazilian imports and exports. Energy Conversion and Management, 1996, 37(6–8): 955–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6): 495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lenzen M. A generalized input-output multiplier calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 2001, 13(1): 65–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mongelli I, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(1): 88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ackerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M. The carbon content of Japan-US trade. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4455–4462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu X B, Wang C. Quantitative analysis of CO2 embodiment in international trade: an overview of emerging literatures. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2009, 3(1): 12–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Peters G P, Hertwich E G. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(4): 379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Herendeen R A, Bullard C W. US Energy Balance of Trade, 1963–1967. Energy Systems and Policy, 1976, 1(4): 383–390

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Bureau of Statistics, National Accounts Division. Inputoutput Tables of China, 2007. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Y, Pan J H, Xie L H. Energy embodied in goods of international trade in China: calculation and policy implications. Economic Research Journal, 2008, 9(1): 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  34. Research Team of China Climate Change Country Study. China Climate Change Country Study. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2000 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. US Energy Information Administration. International Energy Statistics. 2009, http://www.eia.doe.gov/

  36. Su B, Huang H C, Ang B W, Zhou P. Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: the effects of sector aggregation. Energy Economics, 2010, 32(1): 166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lenzen M. Errors in conventional and input-output-based lifecycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2001, 4(4): 127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lenzen M, Pade L L, Munksgaard J. CO2 multipliers in multi-region input-output models. Economic Systems Research, 2004, 16(4): 391–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benyong Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, X., Wei, B. & Wang, Y. Impacts of inter-sectoral trade on carbon emissions—a case of China in 2007. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 6, 387–402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0396-9

Keywords

Navigation