Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating and structuring indicators for wetland assessment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland assessment has been a popular field of research worldwide. However, various indicators have been used in wetland assessment for different purposes and backgrounds and also because of the research limitations. Therefore, a more comprehensive, sound, and efficient indicator system is needed for researchers’ referencing to evaluate wetlands. After an extensive review of wetland assessment literatures, the reported indicators were evaluated using the developed assessment system, based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with three main goals: nature protection, function utilization, and sustainable development. Each indicator was evaluated using two methods. The first method was to study the percentage of the indicator application, and the second was to assess the weighted ratios assigned to the indicators according to principles of comparability, typicality, sensibility, and availability. The results of these two methods were compared to study the commonalities and specialties of the indicators. They also showed that some indicators were widely used, including biodiversity, weather and climate, hydrological change, and the output of wetland. On the other hand, other sustainable indicators were easily ignored, such as environmental carrying capacity and wetland planning. Furthermore, an indicator system for wetland assessment was structured and strategized to discuss how to choose indicators for wetland assessment under different conditions. The proposed approach can be used to guide the process of wetland assessments in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu M, Huang Y. Restoration and reestablishment of the damaged ecosystem of inland waters. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1998, 18(5): 547–558 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cui L, Zhang M. Review on the study wetland assessment. World Forestry Research, 2002, 15(6): 46–53 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sun Y. Comparison study of indicators for existing wetland assessment. Dissertation for the Bachelor Degree. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2004 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cui B S, Yang Z F. Establishing an indicator system for ecosystem health evaluation on wetlands I-a theoretical framework. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(7): 1005–1011 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cui B S, Yang Z F. Establishing an indicator system for ecosystem health evaluation on wetlands II-an application. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(8): 1231–1240 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu X D. The assessment of wetland ecosystem based on RS image-taking Dagu River as an example. Dissertation for the MSc Degree. Qindao: China Ocean University, 2006 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shen D Y, Zhong P. Application of ecosystem health assessment in wetland management. Wetland Science & Management, 2008, 4(3): 30–33 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Y, Huang Y L, Liu X P. A health assessment of estuarine wetland ecosystem in Shenzhen River. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2009, 10: 32–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. James R F. Wetland valuation: Guidelines and Techniques. Indonesia Bogor: Asian wetland bureau, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larson J S. Rapid assessment of wetlands: history and application to management. In: Mitsch W J, ed. Global wetlands: Old world and new. Elsevier, 1994, 623–636

  11. Murphy K I. Biotic indicators of riverine wetland ecosystem functioning. In: Mitsch W J, ed. Global wetlands: Old world and new. Elsevier, 1994, 659–682

  12. Masood E, Garwin L. Costing the Earth: when ecology meets economics. Nature, 1998, 395(6701): 426–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Breaux A, Cochrane S, Evens J, Martindale M, Pavlik B, Suer L, Benner D. Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 74(3): 217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hua G, Li Y, Huang C, Liang C, Wang J. Study on the assessment index system of the ecological restoration to the Lalu wetland in Tibet. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2005, 37(6): 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu X, Shi C, Chen C, Wei W. A study on the evaluation index system of an estuarine wetland. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2006, (2): 42–44 (in Chinese)

  16. Hargiss C L M, DeKeyser E S, Kirby D R, Ell M J. Regional assessment of wetland plant communities using the index of plant community integrity. Ecological Indicators, 2008, 8(3): 303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Zhang J, Li Y, Wang X, Liu H, Zhang J. Study on ecological evaluation index system for wetland. Journal of Agro-Environment Science (Previous name: Agricultural Environmental Protection), 1999, 18(6): 283–285 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hillnc, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu S. Principle of Analytical Hierarchy Process. Tianjin: Tianjin University Publication, 1988 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilen B O, Tiner R W. Wetland of the US In: Whigham D F, Dykyjová D, Hejný S, eds. Wetlands of the world I. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. 1993, 515–636

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhuang D C, Dong M H. The wetland biological resources evaluation and exploitation and utilization in Dongting Lake region. Journal of Xiangtan Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2001, 23(1): 76–80 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cui B S, Liu X T. Ecological character changes and sustainability management of wetlands in the Yellow River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002, 21(3): 250–256 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gong D J, Jin K K, Liu Z G, Zhu M. The pilot study of benefit and protection on wetland nature protecting region of three gorge of Yellow River. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), 2003, 39(2): 71–75 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wan Z J, Yu S P, Wang H X, Sun G Y. Analysis and evaluation of the frangibility to the typical wetlands in Songnen Plain. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2003, 35(2): 93–99 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wetland International-China project agency. Economic assessment of wetland. Beijing: China Forestry Publication, 1999 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Xuehua Liu & Yan Sun

Authors
  1. Xuehua Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuehua Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, X., Sun, Y. Evaluating and structuring indicators for wetland assessment. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 4, 221–227 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0029-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0029-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation