Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EMERGY analysis for sustainability evaluation of the Baiyangdian wetland ecosystem in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a quantitative and ecological benefit evaluation of the Baiyangdian wetland in China between the years 2000 and 2006. Methods of EMERGY analysis were applied to illustrate the wetland ecosystem, to evaluate the economic and environmental inputs and consequent yields, and to assess the sustainability of the Baiyangdian wetland. The indicators for the integrated ecological and economic system, such as EMERGY yield ratio (EYR) (7.51), EMERGY investment ratio (EIR) (4.52), environmental loading ratio (ELR) (2.92), EMERGY exchange ratio (0.41), and EMERGY sustainable indicator (ESI) (2.57) were calculated, compared, analyzed, and discussed. The non-renewable investment in Baiyangdian was greater than renewable investment, leading to the unsustainable development of the system. High EYR indicated that the Baiyangdian integrated system had created huge profits for its people, while ELR and ESI revealed that human behavior has been a heavy burden on the environment, and countermeasures should be taken by the Chinese government to relieve and resolve these problems. Potential management methods were also proposed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pannell D J, Glenn N A. A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandre Gowda M J, Jayaramaiah K M. Comparative evaluation of rice production systems for their sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1998, 69: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbona E A, Sarandón S J, Marasas M E, Astier M. Ecological sustainability evaluation of traditional management in different vineyard systems in Berisso, Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2007, 119: 335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi C, Hutchinson S M, Xua S. Evaluation of coastal zone sustainability: An integrated approach applied in Shanghai Municipality and Chong Ming Island. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 71: 335–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin J F, Diemont S A W, Powell E, Stanton M, Levy-Tacher S. EMERGY evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 115: 128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huppes G, Ishikawa M. Sustainability evaluation: Diverging routes recombined? Tasks for a new Working Group on Modelling and Evaluation for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 15: 1183–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tony P. Fuzzy adaptive management of social and ecological carrying capacities for protected areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90: 2551–2557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graymore M L M, Neil G S, Rickson R E. Sustaining Human Carrying Capacity: A tool for regional sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 2009, 16: 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoekstra A Y. Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 1938–1951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeroen C J M, Bergh V D, Verbruggen H. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: An evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees W, Wackernagel M. Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—And why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1996, 16: 223–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Decision Making. New York: John Wiley, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  13. Odum H T. An Energy Circuit Language for Ecological and Social Systems: Its Physical Basis. In: Patten B, ed. In Systems Analysis and Simulations in Ecology. New York: Academic Press, 1971a: 139–211

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bastianoni S, Campbell D, Susani L, Tiezzi E. The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas. Ecological Modelling, 2005, 186: 212–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vassallo P, Bastianoni S, Beiso I, Ridolfi R, Fabiano M. EMERGY analysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farming system. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7: 290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ton S, Odum H T, Delfino J J. Ecological-economic evaluation of wetland management alternatives. Ecological Engineering, 1998, 11: 291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins J B. EMERGY analysis of the Oak Openings region. Ecological Engineering, 2003, 21: 75–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Odum H T, Peterson N. Simulation and evaluation with energy systems blocks. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 93: 155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tilley D R, Brown M T. Dynamic EMERGY accounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropical wetland storm-water management systems. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 192: 327–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ulgiati S, Brown M T. EMERGY evaluations and environmental loading of alternative electricity production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2001, 10: 335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. John M, Rybczyk J C, Callaway J W, Day J. A relative elevation model for a subsiding coastal forested wetland receiving wastewater effluent. Ecological Modelling, 1997, 112: 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ulgiati S, Odum H T, Bastianoni S. EMERGY use, environmental loading and sustainability an EMERGY analysis of Italy. Ecological Modelling, 1994, 73: 215–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang S L, Odum H T. Ecology and economy: EMERGY synthesis and public policy in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 1991, 32: 313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang S L, Wong J H, Chen T C. A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 42: 15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schroll H. Energy-flow and ecological sustainability in Danish agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 1994, 51: 301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Martin J F. EMERGY valuation of diversions of river water to marshes in the Mississippi River Delta. Ecological Engineering, 2002, 18: 265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown M T, McClanahan T R. EMERGY analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 91: 105–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qin P, Wong Y S, Tam N F Y. EMERGY evaluation of Mai Po mangrove marshes. Ecological Engineering, 2000, 16: 271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown M T, Ulgiati S. EMERGY-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering 1997, 9: 51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang S Z, Tian J W, Li G B. The Ecological problems and sustainable development countermeasures of the Bai Yang Dian wet land. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2007, 5: 53–60 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cai J M. Evaluation and classification of tourism resources in Baiyang Lake. Journal of Shanxi normal university (Natural Science), 2007, 21: 105–109 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Odum H T. Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley, 1971, 331

    Google Scholar 

  33. Castellini C, Bastianoni S, Granai C, Bosco A D, Brunetti M. Sustainability of poultry production using the EMERGY approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 114: 343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu H F, Lan S F, Li L, Peng S L. Studies on EMERGY indices for evaluating system sustainable development properties. China Environmental Science, 2002, 22: 380–384 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brown M T, Ulgiati S. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 108: 23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ulgiati S, Brown M T. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 108: 23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Su J Q, Cheng S L, Guo Y C. Climate of Hebei Province. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 1996 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China

    Weiqing Meng

  2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China

    Cui Hao, Hongyuan Li & Meiting Ju

Authors
  1. Weiqing Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cui Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongyuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meiting Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiqing Meng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meng, W., Hao, C., Li, H. et al. EMERGY analysis for sustainability evaluation of the Baiyangdian wetland ecosystem in China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 4, 203–212 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0015-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0015-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation