Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of a dynamic membrane formed with polyethylene glycol on the ultrafiltration of natural organic matter

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation of a dynamic membrane (DM) was investigated using polyethylene glycol (PEG) (molecular weight of 35000 g/mol, concentration of 1 g/L). Two natural organic matters (NOM), Dongbok Lake NOM (DLNOM) and Suwannee River NOM (SRNOM) were used in the ultrafiltration experiments along with PEG. To evaluate the effects of the DM with PEG on ultrafiltration, various transport experiments were conducted, and the analyses of the NOM in the membrane feed and permeate were performed using high performance size exclusion chromatography, and the effective pore size distribution (effective PSD) and effective molecular weight cut off (effective MWCO) were determined. The advantages of DM formed with PEG can be summarized as follows: (1) PEG interferes with NOM transmission through the ultrafiltration membrane pores by increasing the retention coefficient of NOM in UF membranes, and (2) low removal of NOM by the DM is affected by external factors, such as pressure increases during UF membrane filtration, which decreases the effective PSD and effective MWCO of UF membranes. However, a disadvantage of the DM with PEG was severe flux decline; thus, one must be mindful of both the positive and negative influences of the DM when optimizing the UF performance of the membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuberkar V T, Davis R H. Modeling of fouling reduction by secondary membranes. J Membr Sci, 2000, 168: 243–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Oers C W, Vorstman M A G, Kerkhof P J A M. Solute rejection in the presence of a deposited layer during ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci, 1995, 107: 173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsapiuk E A. Ultrafiltration separation of aqueous solutions of poly (ethylene glycol)s on the dynamic membrane formed by gelatin. J Membr Sci, 1996, 116: 17–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang M, Li C, Benjamin M M, Chang Y. Fouling and natural organic matter removal in adsorbent/membrane systems for drinking water treatment. Environ Sci Technol, 2003, 37: 1663–1669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chin Y, Aiken G, O’Loughlin E. Molecular weight, polydispersity, and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Environ Sci Technol, 1994, 28: 1853–1858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Her N, Amy G, Park H-R, Song M. Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling. Wat Res, 2004, 38: 1427–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh S, Khulbe K C, Matsuura T, Ramamurthy P. Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J Membr Sci, 1998, 142: 117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tam C M, Tremblay A Y. Membrane pore characterization-comparison between single and multicomponent solute probe techniques. J Membr Sci, 1991, 57: 271–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shim Y, Lee H J, Lee S, Moon S H, Cho J. Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. Environ Sci Technol, 2000, 28: 864–871

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Combe C, Clark M M. The effects of pH and calcium on the diffusion coefficient of humic acid. J Membr Sci, 2001, 183: 49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thurman E, Malcolm R. Preparative isolation of aquatic humic substances. Environ Sci Technol, 1991, 15: 463–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lide D R. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 84th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2003–2004, 6–181

    Google Scholar 

  13. Probstein R F. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1994

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee S, Park G, Amy G, Hong S-K, Moon S-H, Lee D-H, Cho J. Determination of membrane pore size distribution using the fractional rejection of nonionic and charged macromolecules. J Membr Sci, 2002, 201: 191–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Park N, Yoon Y, Moon S-H, Cho J. Evaluation of the performance of tight-UF membranes with respect to NOM removal using effective MWCO, molecular weight, and apparent diffusivity of NOM. Desalination, 2004, 164: 53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jucker G, Clark M M. Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci, 1994, 97: 37–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Myung S W, Choi I H, Lee S H, Kim I C, Lee K H. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment. Water Sci Technol, 2005, 51(6–7): 159–164

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vrijenhoek E M, Hong S, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci, 2001, 188: 115–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaeweon Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, B., Park, N. & Cho, J. Effects of a dynamic membrane formed with polyethylene glycol on the ultrafiltration of natural organic matter. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 4, 172–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0002-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0002-y

Keywords

Navigation