Skip to main content
Log in

Two-dimensional numerical and eco-toxicological modeling of chemical spills

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of chemical spills on aquatic nontarget organisms were evaluated in this study. Based on a review of three types of current eco-toxicological models of chemicals, i.e., ACQUATOX model of the US-EPA, Hudson River Model of PCBs, and critical body residual (CBR) model and dynamic energy budget (DEBtox) model, this paper presents an uncoupled numerical ecotoxicological model. The transport and transformation of spilled chemicals were simulated by a chemical transport model (including flow and sediment transport), and the mortalities of an organism caused by the chemicals were simulated by the extended threshold damage model, separately. Due to extreme scarcity of data, this model was applied to two hypothetical cases of chemical spills happening upstream of a lake. Theoretical analysis and simulated results indicated that this model is capable of reasonably predicting the acute effects of chemical spills on aquatic ecosystems or organism killings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes R S K, Mann K H. Fundamentals of Aquatic Ecology. 2nd ed. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rand G. M. Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate, and Risk Assessment. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roy K. Ecotoxicological modeling and risk assessment using chemometric tools. Molecular Diversity, 2006, 10: 93–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCarty L S, Mackay D. Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment: Body residuals and modes of toxic action. Environmental Science & Technology, 1993, 27: 1719–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park R A, Clough J S. Aquatox (Release 2): Modeling Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects in Aquatic Ecosystems. Technical Documentation for Environmental Protection Agency. 2004

  6. TAMS Consultants, Inc, Limno-Tech, Inc, Menzie-Cura & Associates, Inc, and Tetra Tech, Inc. Phase report-review copy: Further site characterization and analysis. Volume 2d-Revised baseline modeling report. Hudson River PCBs Reassessment RI/FS For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City Distrcit. 2000

  7. Kooijman S A L M. Parametric analysis of mortality rates in bioassays. Water Research, 1981, 15(1): 107–119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Legierse K C H M, Verhaar H J M, Vaes W H J, De Bruijn J H M, Hermens J L M. Analysis of the time-dependent acute aquatic toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides: The critical target occupation model. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(6): 917–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J H, Landrum P F, Koh C H. Prediction of time-dependent PAH toxicity in Hyalella azteca using a damage assessment model. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(14): 3131–3138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kooijman S A L M. Dynamic Energy Budgets in Biological Systems: Theory and Applications in Ecotoxicology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jager T, Kooijman S A L M. Modeling receptor kinetics in the analysis of survival data for organophosphorus pesticides. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(21): 8307–8314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ashauer R, Boxall A B A, Drown C D. New ecotoxicological model to simulate survival of aquatic invertebrates after exposure to fluctuating and sequential pulses of pesticides. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(4): 1480–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee J H, Landrum P F, Hwankoh C. Toxicokinetics and time-dependent PAH toxicity in the amphipod hyalella azteca. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(14): 3124–3130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang S L, Wan Z H, Smith P. Numerical simulation of heavy metal pollutant transport-transformation in fluvial rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, 2007, 45(4): 451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang S L. Two-dimensional numerical modeling of chemical transport-transformation in fluvial rivers: Formulation of equations and physical interpretation, Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2009, 11(2): 106–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mossman D J, Schnoor J L, Stumm W. Predicting the effects of a pesticide release to the Rhine River. Journal WPCF (Water Pollution Control Federation), 1988, 60(10): 1806–1812

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suiliang Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, S., Jia, Y. & Wang, S.S.Y. Two-dimensional numerical and eco-toxicological modeling of chemical spills. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 3, 178–185 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-009-0020-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-009-0020-9

Keywords

Navigation