Advertisement

Field experiment on biological contact oxidation process to treat polluted river water in the Dianchi Lake watershed

  • Lu Li
  • Shuguang Xie
  • Hui Zhang
  • Donghui WenEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

In this study two types of biological contact oxidation processes (BCOP), a step-feed (SBCOP) unit and an inter-recycle (IBCOP) unit, were designed to investigate the treatment of heavily polluted river water. The Daqing River, which is the largest pollutant contributor to the Dianchi Lake, one of the most eutrophic freshwater lakes in China, was taken for the case study. It was found that the SBCOP had higher adaptability and better performance in the reduction of COD, TN, and TP, which made it applicable for the treatment of polluted river water entering the Dianchi Lake. Nitrification rate was observed to be greatly affected by the influent temperature. During each season, the nitrification in the SBCOP was higher than that in the IBCOP. TN removal efficiency in the SBCOP was higher than that in the IBCOP during the winter and spring but poorer during the summer, possibly due to the inhibition of denitrification by higher dissolved oxygen level in the summer. Moreover, symbiotic algaebacteria growth may be conducive to the removal of pollutants.

Keywords

step-feed biological contact oxidation process (SBCOP) inter-recycle biological contact oxidation process (IBCOP) river water removal efficiency nitrogen transformation the Dianchi Lake watershed 

References

  1. 1.
    State Environmental Protection Administration of China. 2006 Annual Report on China Environmental Status. Environmental Protection, 2007, 7B: 79–82 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu W, Qiu R L. Water eutrophication in China and the combating strategies. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2007, 82(9): 781–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naiman R J, Decamps H. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997, 28: 621–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anbumozhi V, Radhakrishnan J, Yamaji E. Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality. Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24(5): 517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boonsook P, Luanmanee S, Attanandana T, Kamidouzono A, Masunaga T, Wakatsuki T. A comparative study of permeable layer medias and aeration regime on efficiency of multi-soil-layering system for domestic wastewater treatment in Thailand. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2003, 49(6): 873–882Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Ceballos B S O, Oliveira H, Meira C M B S, Konig A, Guimaraes A O, de Souza J T. River water quality improvement by natural and constructed wetland systems in the tropical semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil. Water Science and Technology, 2001, 44 (11–12): 599–605Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jing S R, Lin Y F, Lee D Y, Wang T W. Nutrient removal from polluted river water by using constructed wetlands. Bioresource Technology, 2001,76(2): 131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou X H. Design of the surface-corridor sewage treatment system applicable for river treatment. Design of Hydroelectric Power Station, 2004, 20(3): 44–46 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruan X, Xue Y, Wu J, Ni L, Sun M, Zhang X. Treatment of polluted river water using pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2006, 76: 90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang J, He M, Shao W S, Hu H Y, Gao B Y. Sustainable operation of subsurface constructed wetland treating polluted river water, Environmental Sciences, 2006, 27(9): 1760–1764 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang D, Li K M, Liu J, Yang Y K. Application study of oxidation pond in the bioremediation of black-odor river. Ecology and Environment, 2005, 14(6): 822–826 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Furukawa K, Ichimatsu Y, Harada C, Shimozono S, Hazama M. Nitrification of polluted urban river waters using zeolite-coated nonwovens. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 2000, 35 (8): 1267–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X J, Xia S Q, Zhang Q X, Li W M, Li S Y. Treatment of the branch water of Suzhou River by using suspended filler movingbed. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, 2002, 3(1): 27–30 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang R C, Wen X H, Jing Y Q, Qian Y. Remediation of polluted river water by using a suspended carrier biofilm reactor. Environmental Sciences, 2004, 25(Suppl): 67–69 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park Y S, Moon J H, Kim D S, Ahn K H. Treatment of a polluted stream by a fixed-bed biofilm reactor with sludge discharger and backwashing system. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2004, 99: 265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin Y Q, He M, Hu H Y, Guan Y T, Zhang J. Pilot study on polluted river water treatment by using seepage biological bed. China Water & Wastewater, 2005, 21(3): 8–11 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li X K, Huang R X, Bao L L, Shao C H, Zhang J. Simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a continuous-flow two-sludge system. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 18(1): 52–57Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen C K, Lo S L. Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater using an activated sludge/contact aeration process. Water Science & Technology, 2003, 47(12): 285–292Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiao Y T, Wu M, Liu H, Xu J H. Removal of NO4+-N from polluted water resources by bioremediation of biofilm process with elastic packing and micropore aerator. Environmental Science, 2001, 22(3): 40–43 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gorgun E, Artan N, Orhon D, Sozen S. Evaluation of nitrogen removal of the step feeding in large treatment plants. Water Science & Technology, 1996, 34(1–2): 253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fillos J, Diyamandoglu V, Carrio LA, Robinson L. Full-scale evaluation of biological nitrogen removal in the step-feed activated sludge process. Water Environmental Research, 1996, 68: 132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rother E, Cornel P. Optimising design, operation and energy consumption of biological aerated filters (BAF) for nitrogen removal of municipal wastewater Water Science & Technology, 2004, 50(6): 131–139Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations