Effect of rhizosphere on soil microbial community and in-situ pyrene biodegradation

Research Article

Abstract

To access the influence of a vegetation on soil microorganisms toward organic pollutant biogegration, this study examined the rhizospheric effects of four plant species (sudan grass, white clover, alfalfa, and fescue) on the soil microbial community and in-situ pyrene (PYR) biodegradation. The results indicated that the spiked PYR levels in soils decreased substantially compared to the control soil without planting. With equal planted densities, the efficiencies of PYR degradation in rhizosphere with sudan grass, white clover, alfalfa and fescue were 34.0%, 28.4%, 27.7%, and 9.9%, respectively. However, on the basis of equal root biomass the efficiencies were in order of white clover >> alfalfa > sudan > fescue. The increased PYR biodegradation was attributed to the enhanced bacterial population and activity induced by plant roots in the rhizosphere. Soil microbial species and biomasses were elucidated in terms of microbial phospholipid ester-linked fatty acid (PLFA) biomarkers. The principal component analysis (PCA) revealed significant changes in PLFA pattern in planted and non-planted soils spiked with PYR. Total PLFAs in planted soils were all higher than those in non-planted soils. PLFA assemblages indicated that bacteria were the primary PYR degrading microorganisms, and that Gram-positive bacteria exhibited higher tolerance to PYR than Gram-negative bacteria did.

Keywords

pyrene rhizosphere plant roots microbial community microbial degradation phospholipid ester-linked fatty acid (PLFA) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Newman L A, Strand S E, Choe N, Duffy J, Ekuan G. Uptake and biotransformation of trichloroethylene by hybrid poplars. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31: 1062–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pilon-Smits E. Phytoremediation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2005, 56: 15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones K C, Stratford J A, Waterhouse K S, Vogt N B. Organic contaminants in Welsh soils: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1989, 23: 540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dong R B, Xu D F, Liu L., He Z J, Qi M F, Zeng H Q. The behavior of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the environment. Environ. Dev, 1999, 14(4): 10–11, 45 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wennrich L, Popp P, Zeibig M. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon burden in fruit and vegetable species cultivated in allotments in an industrial area. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 2002, 82(10): 677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fismes J, Perrin-Ganier C, Empereur-Bissonnet P, Morel J L. Soil-to-root transfer and translocation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by vegetables grown on industrial contaminated soils. J. Environ. Qual., 2002, 31(5): 1649–1656Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen L D, Nestler C, Ringelberg D, Bajpai R. Extended bioremediation of PAH/PCP contaminated soils from the POPILE wood treatment facility. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(10): 1481–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brady C A L, Gill R A, Lynch P T. Preliminary evidence for the metabolism of benzo(a) pyrene by Plantago lanceolata. Environ. Geochem. Health, 2003, 25(1): 131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Straube W L, Nestler C C, Hansen L D, Ringleberg D, Prichard P H, Jone-Meehan J. Remediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) through landfarming with biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Acta Biotechnol., 2003, 23(2–3): 179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wild E, Dent J, Tomas G O, Jones K C. Direct observation of organic contaminant uptake, storage, and metabolism with plant roots. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39: 3695–3702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aprill W, Sims R C. Evaluation of the use of prairie grasses for stimulating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon treatment in soil. Chemosphere, 1990, 20: 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu S Y, Chen Y X, Lin Q, Wu W X, Xue S G, Shen C F. Uptake and accumulation of phenanthrene and pyrene in spiked soils by Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). J. Environ. Sci., 2005, 17(5): 817–822Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oleszczuk P, Baran S. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons content in shoots and leaves of willow (Salix viminalis) cultivated on the sewage sludge-amended soil. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 2005, 168 (1–4): 91–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parrish Z D, Banks M K, Schwab A P. Effect of root death and decay on dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere of yellow sweet clover and tall fescue. J. Environ. Qual., 2005, 34(1): 207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terry N, Zayed A, Pilon-Smits E, Hansen D. Can plants solve the selenium problem? In: Proceedings/Abstracts of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium, Current Topics in Plant Biochemistry, Physiology, and Molecular Biology-Will Plants Have a Role in Bioremediation? Columbia: Interdisciplinary Plant Group, University of Missouri, 1995, 63–64Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burken J G, Schnoor J L. Uptake and Metabolism of atrazine by poplar trees. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31: 1399–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnsen A R, Winding A, Karlson U, Roslev P. Linking of microorganisms to phenanthrene metabolism in soil by analysis of C-13-labeled cell lipids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2002, 68(12): 6106–6113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCutcheon S C, Schnoor J L. Overview of phytotransformation and control of wastes. In: McCutcheon S C, Schnoor J L, eds. Phytoremediation: Transformation and Control of Contaminants. New York: Wiley, 2003, 3–58Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirk J L, Klironomos J N, Lee H, Trevors J T. The effects of perennial ryegrass and alfalfa on microbial abundance and diversity in petroleum contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut., 2005, 133: 455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang H, Su Y H, Zhu Y G. Influences of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on soil microbial community composition with or without vegetation. J. Environ. Sci.Health, 2007, 42(1): 65–72Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Su Y H, Zhu Y G. Uptake of selected PAHs from contaminated soils by rice seedlings (Oryza sativa) and influence of rhizosphere on PAH distribution. Environ. Pollut., 2008, 155(2): 359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siciliano S D, Germida J J. Mechanisms of phytoremediation: Biochemical and ecological interactions between plants and bacteria. Environ. Rev., 1998, 6: 65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sciliano S D, Germida J J, Banks K, Greer C W. Changes in microbial community composition and function during a poly-aromatic hydrocarbon phytoremediation field trial. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2003, 69: 483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Macek T, Mackova M, Kas J. Research review paper: Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol. Adv., 2000, 18: 23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harvey P J, Campanella B F, Castro P M L, Harms H, Lichtfouse E, Schaffner A R, Smercek S, Werk-Reichharts D. Phytoremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, anilines and phenols. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2002, 9(1): 29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frostegåd Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E. Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic content. J. Microbial.Methods, 1991, 14: 151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zelles L, Bai Q Y, Beck T, Beese F. Signature fatty acids in phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides as indicators of microbial biomass and community structure in agriculture soil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 1992, 24: 317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murata T, Takagi K, Yokoyama K. Relationship between soil bacteria community structure based on composition of fatty acid methyl esters and the amount of bacterial biomass in Japanese lowland rice fields. Soil Biol. Biochem., 2002, 34: 885–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fang J S, Barcelona M J. Biogeochemical evidence for microbial community change in a jet fuel hydrocarbons-contaminated aquifer. Org. Geochem., 1998, 29(4): 899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    O’Leary W M, Wilkinson S G. Gram-positive bacteria. In: Ratledge C, Wilkinson S G, eds. Microbial Lipids. London: Academic Press, 1988, 117–202Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bardgett R D, Hobbs P J, Frostegård A. Changes in soil fungal: Bacterial biomass ratios following reductions in the intensity of management of an upland grassland. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 1996, 22: 261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentXinjiang UniversityUrumqiChina
  2. 2.College of Resources and EnvironmentNorthwest A & F UniversityYanglingChina
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations