Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uncertainty analysis on aquatic environmental impacts of urban land use change

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainties hamper the implementation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA). In order to quantitatively characterize the uncertainties of environmental impacts, this paper develops an integrated methodology through uncertainty analysis on land use change, which combines the scenario analysis approach, stochastic simulation technique, and statistics. Dalian city in China was taken as a case study in the present work. The results predict that the Fuzhou River poses the highest environmental pollution risk with a probability of 89.63% for COD in 2020. Furthermore, the Biliu River, Fuzhou River, Zhuang River, and Dasha River have 100% probabilities for NH3-N. NH3-N is a more critical pollutant than COD for all rivers. For COD, industry is the critical pollution source for all rivers except the Zhuang River. For NH3-N, agriculture is the critical pollution source for the Biliu River, Yingna River, and Dasha River, sewage for the Fuzhou River and Zhuang River, and industry for the Dengsha River. This methodology can provide useful information, such as environmental risk, environmental pressure, and extremely environmental impact, especially under considerations of uncertainties. It can also help to ascertain the significance of each pollution source and its priority for control in urban planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gordon M. Mapping hazard from urban non-point pollution: Ascreening model to support sustainable urban drainage planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 74(1): 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnes P J, Heathwaite A L. Modelling the impact of land use change on water quality in agricultural catchments. Hydrological Processes, 1997, 11(3): 269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goonetilleke A, Thomas E, Ginn S, Gilbert D. Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater quality management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 74(1): 31–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Partidário M R. Strategic environmental assessment: Key issues emerging from recent practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1996, 16: 31–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shepherd A, Ortolano L. Strategic environmental assessment for sustainable urban development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1996, 16: 321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Y, Chen J, Fan L, Liang H, Liu Y, Zhang Y. Public participation in strategic environmental assessment of urban plan in China: a methodology and case study on Dalian municipality. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(3): 428–432 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tzilivakis J, Broom C, Lewis K A, Tucker P, Drummond C, Cook R. A strategic environmental assessment method for agricultural policy in the UK. Land Use Policy, 1999, 16(4): 223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arce R, Gullón N. The application of Strategic Environmental Assessment to sustainability assessment of infrastructure development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2000, 20: 393–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma L, Arentze T, Borgers A, Timmermans H. Modelling land-use decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Computers Environment And Urban Systems, 2007, 31(4): 461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Chen J, He W, Zeng S, Wu H. Integrating uncertainty analysis into strategic environmental assessment of urban master plan: a methodology and case study. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(4): 566–571 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prato T. Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty. Land Use Policy, 2007, 24(1): 165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brookes A. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. Area, 1998, 30(3): 275–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldmann L. The European Commission’s Proposal for a strategic environmental assessment directive: expanding the scope of environmental impact assessment in Europe. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1998, 18: 3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadler B. Strategic Environmental Assessment: International Experience and Future Prospects. In: The China Mainland- Hong Kong Symposium on Regional EIA. Hong Kong: 1999

  15. Von Seht H. Requirements of a comprehensive strategic environmental assessment system. Landscape And Urban Planning, 1999, 45(1): 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Annandale D, Bailey J, Ouano E, Evans W, King P. The potential role of strategic environmental assessment in the activities of multi-lateral development banks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2001, 21: 407–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diaz M, Illera J C, Hedo D. Strategic environmental assessment of plans and programs: A methodology for estimating effects on biodiversity. Environmental Management, 2001, 28(2): 267–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Che X, Shang J, Wang J. Strategic environmental assessment and its development in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2002, 22: 101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bao C K, Lu Y S, Shang J C. Framework and operational procedure for implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24(1): 27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liou M L, Yu Y H. Development and implementation of strategic environmental assessment in Taiwan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24(3): 337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alshuwaikhat H M. Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2005, 25(4): 307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Short M, Jones C, Carter J, Baker M, Wood C. Current practice in the strategic environmental assessment of development plans in England. Regional Studies, 2004, 38(2): 177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Termorshuizen C. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 1997, 26(2): 591–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Finnveden G, Nilsson M, Johansson J, Persson A, Moberg A, Carlssond T. Strategic environmental assessment methodologies - applications within the energy sector. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2003, 23: 91–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oñate J J, Pereira D, Suarez F. Strategic environmental assessment of the effects of European Union’s Regional Development Plans in Donana National Park (Spain). Environmental Management, 2003, 31(5): 642–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J H, Guo H C, Liu L, Hao M J, Zhang M, Lu X J, Xing K X. An inexact multi-objective programming approach for strategic environmental assessment on regional development plan. Progress In Natural Science, 2004, 14(11): 950–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. GB3838-2002. National Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water. Beijing: State Environmental Protection Administration, 2002 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Duinker P N, Greig L A. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2007, 27(3): 206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banuls V A, Salmeron J L. A Scenario-based assessment model—SBAM. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 2007, 74(6): 750–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Salathe E P, Mote PW, Wiley M W. Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest. International Journal of Climatology, 2007, 27(12): 1611–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abildtrup J, Audsley E, Fekete-Farkas M, Giupponi C, Gylling M, Rosato P, Rounsevell M. Socio-economic scenario development for the assessment of climate change impacts on agricultural land use: A pairwise comparison approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 2006, 9(2): 101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Basset-Mens C, van der Werf H M G. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: The case of pig production in France. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2005, 105(1–2): 127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fukushima Y, Hirao M. A structured framework and language for scenario-based life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7(6): 317–329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. ChandlerR D., Estimating Annual Urban Nonpoint Pollutant Loads. Journal of Management In Engineering, 1994, 10(6): 50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnes P.J. Evaluation and management of the impact of land use change on the nitrogen and phosphorus load delivered to surface waters: The export coefficient modelling approach. Journal of Hydrology, 1996, 183(3–4): 323–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Soranno P A, Hubler S L, Carpenter S R, Lathrop R C. Phosphorus loads to surface waters: A simple model to account for spatial pattern of land use. Ecological Applications, 1996, 6(3): 865–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen M, Chen J, Du P. An inventory analysis of rural pollution loads in China. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 54(11/12): 65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. GB8978-1996. Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard. Beijing: State Environmental Protection Administration, 1996 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  39. GB18918-2002. Discharge Standard of Pollutants for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Beijing: State Environmental Protection Administration, 2002 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ni C H, Chen J N, Tsai Y C, Chen W B, Chen C H. Ozonation of domestic secondary effluent for recycling and reuse — a pilot plant study. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(4–5): 361–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen J, Deng Y. Identifiability analysis of the CSTR river water quality model. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 53(1): 93–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Young P C, Hornberger G M, Spear R C. Modelling badly defined systems -some further thoughts. In: SIMSIG simulation conference. Canberra, Australia: 1978

  43. Hornberger G M, Spear R C. Eutrophication in Peel Inlet: I. The problem-defining behaviour and a mathematical model for the phosphorus scenario. Water Research, 1980, 14: 29–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Spear R C, Hornberger G M. Eutrophication in Peel Inlet: II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis. Water Research, 1980, 14: 43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Beck M B. Water-quality modeling—a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 1987, 23(8): 1393–1442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J, Beck M B. Quality Assurance of Multi-Media Model for Predictive Screening Tasks. USEPA, 1999

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Jiquan Zhou, Yi Liu, Jining Chen & Fanxian Yu

Authors
  1. Jiquan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jining Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fanxian Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Chen, J. et al. Uncertainty analysis on aquatic environmental impacts of urban land use change. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2, 494–504 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0072-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0072-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation