Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of detection method of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in reclaimed water

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cryptosporidium and Giardia are two typical species of pathogenic protozoans that seriously endanger water quality. Previous works indicated that detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia with modified United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) method-1623 using a membrane filtration-elution for sample concentration attained better recovery and lower cost compared to the USEPA method-1623. Several improvements of membrane filtration-elution step as well as immunomagnetic separation (IMS) steps were investigated and an optimized method for detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in wastewater reclamation system was recommended in this paper. The experimental results show that an overnight soak of the membrane after scraping and vortex agitation before elution could enhance and stabilize the recovery. Increasing turbidity to 4 NTU by adding kaolin clay before filtration could effectively improve the recovery of low-turbidity water. Washing the concentrate after centrifugation and twice acid dissociation both reduced the impact of water quality to protozoan recovery. Protozoans in different water samples were determined by this optimized method, and the recovery of Cryptosporidium and Giardia were above 70% and 80% respectively, much higher than the acceptance of method-1623.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bastos R K X, Heller L, Vieira M B M. Giardia sp. cysts and Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts dynamics in southeast Brazil: Occurrence in surface water and removal in water treatment processes. Water Supply, 2004, 4(2): 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masago Y, Oguma K, Katayama H. Cryptosporidium monitoring system at a water treatment plant, based on waterborne risk assessment. Water Science and Technology, 2004, 50(1): 293–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashimoto A, Kunikane S, Hirata T. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in the drinking water supply in Japan. Water Research, 2002, 36(3): 519–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu B M, Huang C P, Hsu C L, Yeh J H. Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in the Kau-Ping River and its watershed in Southern Taiwan. Water Research, 1999, 33(11): 2701–2707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bukhari Z, Smith H V, Sykes N, Humphreys S W, Paton C A, Ficker C R. The Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts and Giardia cysts in sewage influents and effluents from treatment plants in England. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35(11–12): 385–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose J B, Farrah S R, Harwood V J, Scott T M. Reduction of pathogens, indicator bacteria, and alternative indicators by wastewater treatment and reclamation processes. Water Environment Research Foundation Final Report, 2004

  7. Gennaccaro A L, McLaughlin M R, Quintero-Betancourt W, et al. Infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in final reclaimed effluent. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(8): 4983–4984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott T M, McLaughlin M R, Harwood V J, et al. Reduction of pathogens, indicator bacteria, and alternative indicators by wastewater treatment and reclamation processes. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2003, 3(4): 247–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harwood V J, Levine A D, Scott T M, Chivukula V, Lukaisk J, Farrah S R, Rose J B. Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed water and public health protection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(6): 3163–3170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey C M, Lee H, Trevors J T. Biology, persistence and detection of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis oocyst. Water Research, 2004, 38: 818–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1623: Cryptosporidium in Water by Filtration/IMS/FA. EPA-821-r-99-006. 1999

  12. Hsu B, Huang C, Hsu Y, Jiang G, Hsu C. Evaluation of two concentration methods for detecting Giardia and Cryptosporidium in water. Water Research, 2001, 35(2): 419–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zong Z S, Hu H Y, Zhang J S, Lu Y X, Yu D J, Deng Z P. Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in Water by using PCR technology. China Water & Wastewater, 2004, 20(8): 91–93 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Emelko M B, Brown T. How conditions and coagulant type can affect Crypto removal. Environmental Science & Engineering, 2003, 5: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Emelko M B, Huck P M, Douglas I P. Cryptosporidium and microsphere removal during late in-cycle filtration. American Water Works Association Journal, 2003, 95(5): 173–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim H S, Shikiya J, Akiba M, Kunikane S. Examination of monodispersed artificial particles similar to C. parvum oocysts in size as the removal surrogate of Cryptosporidium. Journal of Water Supply: Rearch and Technology, 2004, 53(1): 51–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Emelko M B, Huck P M. Microspheres as surrogates for Cryptosporidium filtration. American Water Works Association Journal, 2004, 96(3): 94–105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pezzana A, Vilaginès Ph, Bordet F, Sarrette B, Vilagines R. Optimization of the Envirochek capsule method and immunomagnetic separation procedure for the detection of low levels of Cryptosporidium in large drinking water samples. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 41(7): 111–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu J, Feng Y, Ong S L, Ng W L, Song L, Tan X, Chu X. Improvement of recoveries for the determination of protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water using method 1623. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2004, 58: 321–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng Y, Ong S L, Hu J, Song L, Tan X, Ng W L. Effect of Particles on the Recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts from source water samples of various turbidities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(4): 1898–1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Warren L A, Ferris F G. Continuum between sorption and precipitation of Fe(III) on microbial surfaces. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32: 2331–2337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yakub G P, Stadterman-Knauer K L. Evaluation of Immunomagnetic separation for recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis from high-iron matrices. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(8): 3628–3631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongying Hu.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Environmental Science, 2006, 27(12): 2547–2552 [译自: 环境科学]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Xie, X., Hu, H. et al. Improvement of detection method of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in reclaimed water. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2, 380–384 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0052-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0052-6

Keywords

Navigation