Abstract
DC Resistivity Tomography is a non-linear inversion problem. So far there are mainly two kinds of inversion methods, based on the finite-element method and alpha centers method. In this paper, the disadvantages of these two kinds of methods were analysed, and a new method of forward modeling and inversion (Tomography) based on boundary integral equations was proposed. This scheme successfuly overcomes the difficulties of the two formarly methods. It isn’t necessary to use the linearization approximation and calculate the Jacobi matrix. Numerical modeling results given in this paper showed that the computation speed of our method is fast, and there is not any special requirement for initial model, and satisfying results of tomography can be obtained in the case of great contrast of conductivity. So it has wide applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yutaka Sasaki. 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method. Geophysics, 1994,59(11):1839–1848
Hiromasa Shima. Two-dimensional automatic resistivity inversion technique using alpha centers. Geophysics, 1990,55(6):682–694
Hiromasa Shima. 2-D and 3-D resistivity image reconstruction using crosshole data, Geophysics, 1992,57(10):1270–1281
Mao Xianjin, Bao Guangshu. A new method for forward modeling in 2.5-D resistivity problem. J Cent South Univ Technol (in Chinese), 1997,28(4):307–310
Spiegel R J. Modeling resistivity anomalies from localized voids under irregular terrain. Geophysics, 1980,45(7):1164–1183
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Synopsis of the first author Mao Xianjin, doctoral student, born in April 1962, majoring in surveys and theory research of electric methods.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, X., Bao, G. 2.5-D Resistivity Tomography using boundary integral equations. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 4, 104–107 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-997-0008-1
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-997-0008-1