Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity-based performance measurements for loading equipment in open pit mines

基于能力露天矿山装载设备的性能测量

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop an integrated framework for capacity analysis to address the influence of systematic hazardous factors on the haulage fleet nominal capacity. The proposed model was made to capture unexpected risks for mining equipment based upon data-driven method considering different scenarios. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) was employed to quantify the loss of production capacity by focusing on severity of failure incidents and maintainability measurements. Discrete-event simulation was configured to characterize the nominal capacity for mining operation. Accordingly, the system capacity was analyzed through the comparison of nominal and actual capacity. A case study was completed to validate the research methodology. The past operation and maintenance field data were collected for shovel operation. The discrete-event simulation was developed to estimate the rate of shovel nominal capacity. Then, the effects of undesirable scenarios were assessed by developing the PRA approach. The research results provide significant insights into how to enhance the production capacity in mines. The analyst gets a well judgment for the crucial elements dealing with high risk levels. A holistic maintenance plan can be developed to mitigate and control the losses.

摘要

本研究的目的是建立一个综合的能力分析框架模型, 以解决系统的危险因素对运输车队额定能 力的影响。该模型是基于数据驱动的方法, 考虑不同的场景, 捕捉采矿设备的突发风险。概率风险评 估(PRA)是通过关注故障事件的严重性和可维护性度量来量化生产能力的损失。配置离散事件模拟来 表征采矿作业的标称能力。在此基础上, 通过标称能力与实际能力的比较, 对系统能力进行了分析。 通过一个案例研究验证了本文的研究方法, 收集了铲运机过去的运行维护现场数据。采用离散事件模 拟方法对铲斗标称能力进行了估计, 然后, 通过开发PRA 方法来评估不良场景的影响。研究结果为 提高矿山生产能力提供了重要的启示。分析人员对处理高风险水平的关键因素有很好的判断, 可以制 定一个全面的维护计划来减少和控制损失。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WOLSTENHOLME E, COYLE R. Modelling discrete events in system dynamics models: A case study [J]. Dynamica, 1980, 6: 21–28. https://www.systemdynamics.org/assets/dynamica/61/6.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SONTAMINO P, DREBENSTEDT C. A prototype dynamics model for finding an optimum truck and shovel of a new surface lignite mining in Thailand [C]// Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium Continuous Surface Mining. Aachen: Springer, 2015: 493–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12301-1_42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BARABADI A, BARABADY J, MARKESET T. A methodology for throughput capacity analysis of a production facility considering environment condition [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96: 1637–1646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. MD-NOR Z, KECOJEVIC V, KOMLJENOVIC D, GROVES W. Risk assessment for loader-and dozer-related fatal incidents in US mining [J]. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2008, 15: 65–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300801977261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. PAITHANKAR A. Hazard identification and risk analysis in mining industry [D]. Rourkela: National Institute of Technology, 2011. http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/2445/.

    Google Scholar 

  6. RUFF T, COLEMAN P, MARTINI L. Machine-related injuries in the US mining industry and priorities for safety research [J]. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2011, 18: 11–20. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2010.487154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ROY S, BHATTACHARYYA M, NAIKAN V. Maintainability and reliability analysis of a fleet of shovels [J]. Mining Technology, 2001, 110: 163–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/mnt.2001.110.3.163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. SAMANTA B, SARKAR B, MUKHERJEE S. Reliability analysis of shovel machines used in an open cast coal mine [J]. Mineral Resources Engineering, 2001, 10: 219–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0950609801000610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. PATNAYAK S, TANNANT D, PARSONS I, DEL VALLE V, WONG J. Operator and dipper tooth influence on electric shovel performance during oil sands mining [J]. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2008, 22: 120–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930701482961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KOENIGSBERG E. Cyclic queues [J]. The Journal of the Operational Research Society (OR), 1958, 1: 22–35. DOI: 10.2307/3007650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ADAN I, RESING J. Queueing theory [M]. Eindhoven: University of Technology Eindhoven, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. ALLEN T T. Introduction to discrete event simulation and agent-based modeling: Voting systems. health care, military, and manufacturing [M]. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2011. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-139-4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. BRAILSFORD S, HILTON N. A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health care systems. [M]// Planning for the Future: Health Service Quality and Emergency Aceessibility. Operational Research Applied to Health Services (ORAHS) Glasgow Caledonian University 2001. [2016-07-11] https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/35689.

    Google Scholar 

  14. TA CH, INGOLFSSON A, DOUCETTE J. A linear model for surface mining haul truck allocation incorporating shovel idle probabilities [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 231: 770–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.016.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. National Research Council Staff. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process [M]. National Academies Press, 1984. DOI: 10.17226/366.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MODARRES M. Risk analysis in engineering: Techniques, tools, and trends [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. DHILLON B S. Maintainability, maintenance, and reliability for engineers [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. MODARRES M, KAMINSKIY M P, KRIVTSOV V. Reliability engineering and risk analysis: A practical guide [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. STAMATELATOS M, DEZFULI H, APOSTOLAKIS G, EVERLINE C, GUARRO S, MATHIAS D, MOSLEH A, PAULOS T, RIHA D, SMITH C. Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners [R]. Washington DC: NASA. 2011. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18206.13122

    Google Scholar 

  20. BARI R, BUSLIK A, CHO N, EL- BASSIONI A, FRAGOLA J, HALL R E, LLBERG D, LOFGREN E, O' BRIEN J, PAPAZOGLOU I A. Probabilistic safety analysis procedures guide [R]. Prepared for US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-2815. 1985, 1. [2016-02-05] https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr2815/.

    Google Scholar 

  21. SALEHPOUR-OSKOUEI F, POURGOL-MOHAMMAD M. Fault diagnosis improvement using dynamic fault model in optimal sensor placement: A case study of steam turbine [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, 33(3): 531–541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. PARTICIPANTS O. OREDA offshore reliability data handbook [M]. Trondhim, Norway: DNV, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. US Department of Defense. MIL-HDBK-217F. Reliability prediction of electronic equipment [M]. Washington DC: US Department of Defense, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quanterion Solution Incorporated. Nonelectronic parts reliability data (NPRD95) [M]. Utica, NY, USA: Quanterion Solution Incorporated, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. MEYER M A, BOOKER J M. Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment: a practical guide [M]. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718485.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. KECECIOGLU D. Reliability engineering handbook [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. MARTZ H, WALLER R. Bayesian reliability analysis [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. KVALOY J T, LINDQVIST B. An area based test for trend in repairable systems data [EB/OL] [2016-02-11] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-Area-Based-Test-for-Trend-in-Repairable-Systems-Kval-Lindqvist/6bd5185745b7315e3a8d6c647584454a4bf5c85c.

  29. NELSON W B. Recurrent events data analysis for product repairs, disease recurrences, and other applications [M]. Philadelphia: ASA/SIAM. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898718454.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. MORAD A M, POURGOL-MOHAMMAD M, SATTARVAND J. Application of reliability-centered maintenance for productivity improvement of open pit mining equipment: Case study of sungun copper mine [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21: 2372–2382. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2190-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. LEEMIS L M. Reliability: probabilistic models and statistical methods [M]. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. LOUIT D M, PASCUAL R, JARDINE A K S. A practical procedure for the selection of time-to-failure models based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94: 1618–1628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MASSEY F J Jr. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1951, 46: 68–78. DOI: 10.2307/2280095.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. BIRNBAUM Z W. On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system [M]. Washington DC: University of Washington, Laboratory of Statistical Research, 1968.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. FUSSELL J. How to hand-calculate system reliability and safety characteristics [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1975, 3: 169–174. DOI: 10.1109/TR.1975.5215142.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. VESELY W, DAVIS T, DENNING R, SALTOS N. Measures of risk importance and their applications [R]. Washington DC: Division of Risk Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. CHADWELL G B, LEVERENZ F L. Importance measures for prioritization of mechanical integrity and risk reduction activities [R]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to appreciate the support of the operation management and maintenance department at Sungun Copper Mine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moniri-Morad, A., Pourgol-Mohammad, M., Aghababaei, H. et al. Capacity-based performance measurements for loading equipment in open pit mines. J. Cent. South Univ. 26, 1672–1686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4124-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-4124-5

Key words

关键词

Navigation