Journal of Central South University

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1207–1216 | Cite as

Dynamic simulation of pilot thickener operation using phenomenological model with results validation for continuous and discontinuous tests

  • Rahimi Mehdi
  • Unesi Majid
  • Rezai Bahram
  • Abdollahzadeh Ali


The phenomenological theory of sedimentation-thickening processes predicts the settling behavior of a flocculated suspension in dependence of two functions, the batch flux density function and the effective solid stress. These functions were determined using batch settling tests. The governing equations for sedimentation were then solved numerically for these functions and the predictions were compared to the experimental results from pilot scale thickener tests. Firstly, the continuous tests were performed in the plexiglass pilot thickener at different feed flow rates and discharge rates and the solid volume fraction of discharge, the bed height and the time were recorded for each condition. These tests were also simulated and it was observed that there is a good agreement between the results of continuous tests and the results of dynamic simulation. Secondly, the discontinuous tests were performed in the plexiglass pilot thickener at different feed flow rates with a discharge rate of zero. The bed formation rate was determined for each condition. These tests were also simulated and it was observed that there is a good agreement between the results of discontinuous tests and the results of simulation.

Key words

dynamic simulation dewatering thickener behavior pilot thickener validation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    BUSCALL R, MILLS P D A, STEWART R F, SUTTON D, WHITE L R, YATES G E. The rheology of strongly-flocculated suspensions [J]. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 24(2): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    VITASOVIC Z Z. Continuous settler operation: A dynamic model [M]// PATRY G G, CHAPMAN D. Dynamic Modelling and Expert Systems in Wastewater Engineering. USA: Lewis, Chelsea, MI, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    VACCARI D A, UCHRIN C G. Modeling and simulation of compressive gravity thickening of activated sludge [J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A, 1989, 24(6): 645–674.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    OTTERPOHL R, FREUND M. Dynamic models for clarifiers of activated sludge plants with dry and wet weather flows [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 26: 1391–1400.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    HARTEL L, POPEL H J. A dynamic secondary clarifier model including processes of sludge thickening [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 25: 267–284.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    HAMILTON J, JAIN R, ANTONIOU P, SVORONOS S A, KOOPMAN B, LYBERATOS G. Modeling and pilot scale experimental verification for predenitrification process [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1992, 118(1): 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    OZINSKY A E, EKAMA G A, REDDY B D. Mathematical simulation of dynamic behaviour of secondary settling tanks [R]. Technical Report W85. South Africa: Dept of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    WATTS R W, SVORONOS S A, KOOPMAN B. One-dimensional modeling of secondary clarifiers using a concentration and feed velocity-dependent dispersion coefficient [J]. Water Research, 1996, 30(29): 2112–2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    BURGER R, DIEHL S, NOPENS I. A consistent modelling methodology for secondary settling tanks in wastewater treatment [J]. Water Research, 2001, 45: 2247–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    BURGER R, CONCHA F. Mathematical model and numerical simulation of the settling of flocculated suspensions [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1998, 24: 1005–1023.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    BURGER R, BUSTOS M C, CONCHA F. Settling velocities of particulate systems: 9. Phenomenological theory of sedimentation processes: numerical simulation of the transient behavior of flocculated suspensions in an ideal batch or continuous thickener [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1999, 55(4): 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    GARRIDO P, BURGOS R, CONCHA F, BURGER R. Settling velocities of particulate systems: A simulator for batch and continuous sedimentation of flocculated suspensions [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2004, 73(2-4): 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    USHER S P, SCALES P J. Steady state thickener modeling from the compressive yield stress and hindered settling function [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 111(2, 3): 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    GLADMAN B R. The effect of shear on dewatering of flocculated suspensions [D]. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 2005.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    USHER S P, SPEHAR R, SCALES P J. Theoretical analysis of aggregate densification: impact on thickener performance [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 151(1-3): 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    GLADMAN B R, RUDMAN M, SCALES P J. The effect of shear on gravity thickening: Pilot scale modeling [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(14): 4293–4301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    van DEVENTER B B G, USHER S P, KUMAR A, RUDMAN M, SCALES P J. Aggregate densification and batch settling [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 171(1): 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    EBRAHIMZADEH M, GOHARRIZI A S, SHAHRIVAR A A, ABDOLLAHI H. Modeling industrial thickener using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), A case study: Tailing thickener in the Sarcheshmeh copper mine [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2013, 23(6): 885–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    GALVEZ E D, CRUZ R, ROBLES P A, CISTERNAS L A. Optimization of dewatering systems for mineral processing [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2014, 63: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    ZHOU T, MAO Li M, LI Q L, LEI B, CHENN Q Z, ZHOU J M. Numerical simulation of flow regions in red mud separation thickener’s feedwell by analysis of residence-time distribution [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014, 24(4): 1117–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    BETANCOURT F, BURGER R, DIEHL S, MEJIAS C. Advanced methods of flux identification for clarifier–thickener simulation models [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2014, 63: 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    RAHIMI M, ABDOLLAHZADEH A, REZAI B. The effect of particle size, pH and flocculant dosage on the gel point, effective solid stress and thickener performance of coal washing plant [J]. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 2015, 35: 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    RICHARDSON J F, ZAKI W N. The sedimentation of a suspension of uniform spheres under conditions of viscous flow [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1954, 3(2): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    BUSCALL R, WHITE L R. The consolidation of concentrated suspensions part 1. The theory of sedimentation [J]. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1987, 83: 873–891.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    KYNCH C J. A theory of sedimentation [J]. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1952, 48: 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahimi Mehdi
    • 1
  • Unesi Majid
    • 2
  • Rezai Bahram
    • 1
  • Abdollahzadeh Ali
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mining and Metallurgical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Mining EngineeringUniversity of KashanKashanIran

Personalised recommendations