Skip to main content
Log in

Practical approach to determining traffic congestion propagation boundary due to traffic incidents

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A practical approach for predicting the congestion boundary due to traffic incidents was proposed. Based on the kinematic wave theory and Van Aerde single-regime flow model, a model for estimating the congestion propagation speed for the basic road segment was developed. Historical traffic flow data were used to analyze the time variant characteristics of the urban traffic flow for each road type. Then, the saturation flow rate was used for analyzing the impact of the traffic incident on the traversing traffic flow at the congestion area. The base congestion propagation speed for each road type was calculated based on field data, which were provided by the remote traffic microwave sensors (RTMS), floating car data (FCD) system and screen line survey. According to a comparative analysis of the congestion propagation speed, it is found that the expressway, major arterial, minor arterial and collector are decreasingly influenced by the traffic incident. Subsequently, the impact of turning movements at intersections on the congestion propagation was considered. The turning ratio was adopted to represent the impact of turning movements, and afterward the corresponding propagation pattern at intersections was analyzed. Finally, an implementation system was designed on a geographic information system (GIS) platform to display the characteristics of the congestion propagation over the network. The validation results show that the proposed approach is able to capture the congestion propagation properties in the actual road network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EDIE L C. Car-following and steady-state theory for non-congested traffic [J]. Operations Research, 1966, 9(1): 66–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. LI Xian-sheng, ZHENG Xue-lian, GUO Wei-wei, REN Yuan-yuan, WANG Yu-ning, YANG Meng. Traffic accident propagation properties and control measures for urban links based on cellular automata [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 2013: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ROBERG P, ABBESS C R, WRIGHT C. Traffic jam simulation [J]. Journal of Maps, 2007, 3(1): 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WRIGHT C, ROBERG P. The conceptual structure of traffic jams [J]. Transport Policy, 1998, 5(1): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DAGANZO C. The cell transmission model: Network traffic [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1995, 29(2): 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LIGHTHILL M J, WHITHAM G B. On kinematic waves II: A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads [C]// Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. London, UK: The Royal Society, 1955: 317–345.

    Google Scholar 

  7. RICHARDS P I. Shock waves on the highway [J]. Operations Research, 1956, 4(1): 42–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. XIE Bo, XU Ming, HARRI J, CHEN Ying-wen. A traffic light extension to cell transmission model for estimating urban traffic jam [C]// Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), IEEE, 2013: 2566–2570.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LONG Jian-cheng, GAO Zi-you, REN Hua-ling, LIAN Ai-ping. Urban traffic congestion propagation and bottleneck identification [J]. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, 2008, 51(7): 948–964.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. LONG Jian-cheng, GAO Zi-you, ORENSTEIN P, REN Hua-ling. Control strategies for dispersing incident-based traffic jams in two-way grid networks [J]. IEEE Transportation on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(2): 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ZHANG Ao-mu-han, GAO Zi-you, REN Hua-ling. Incident-based traffic congestion control strategy [J]. Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(5): 1338–1344.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. LI Shu-bin, FU Bai-bai, ZHENG Jian-feng. Dynamic analysis of traffic state and congestion propagation on bidirectional grid network [J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2013, 2013: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. QI Hong-sheng, WANG Dian-hai, CHEN Peng, BIE Yi-ming. Traffic jam in signalized road network [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21: 832–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. QI Hong-sheng, WANG Dian-hai, CHEN Peng. Formation and propagation of local traffic jam [J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2013, 2013: 1–12.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. LECUE F, TUCKER R, BICER V, TOMMASI P, DIOTALLEVI S T, SBODIO M. Predicting severity of road traffic congestion using semantic web technologies [C]// European Semantic Web Conference. Crete, Greece: Springer International Publishing, 2014: 611–627.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG Xiao-li, PENG Hu. An intelligent-based prediction system for incident induced congestion spreading [C]// 2011 International Conference on Transportation, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering (TMEE), 2011: 2021–2025.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. MA Xiao-lei, YU Hai-yang, WANG Yun-peng, WANG Yin-hai. Large-Scale Transportation network congestion evolution prediction using deep learning theory [J]. PloS One, 2015, 10(3): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. CHENG Tao, TANAKSARANOND G, BRUNSDON C, HAWORTH J. Exploratory visualisation of congestion evolutions on urban transport networks [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 36: 296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ANWAR A, NAGEL T, RATTI C. Traffic origins: A simple visualization technique to support traffic incident analysis [C]// Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), IEEE, 2014: 316–319.

    Google Scholar 

  20. MICHALOPOULOS P G, PISHARODY V B. Derivation of delays based on improved macroscopic traffic models [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1981, 15(5): 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. RAKHA H, CROWTHER B. Comparison of the Greenshields, Pipes, and Van Aerde car-following and traffic stream models [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2002, 2143, 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ZHAO Na-le, YU Lei, ZHAO Hui, GUO Ji-fu, WEN Hui-min. Analysis of traffic flow characteristics on ring-road expressways in Beijing [J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2124: 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ZHU Lin. Theory and method studies on traffic situation assessment for urban expressways [D]. Beijng, China: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. YANG Xiao-bao, ZHANG Ning, HUANG Li-bing. Lane changing model in road capacity simulation [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2007, 24(5): 109–113 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. HESHAM R. Spd_cal [EB/OL]. [2015–4-23] http://filebox.vt.edu/ users/hrakha/software.htm#Integration.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-hua Song  (宋国华).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2012CB725403) supported by the National Basic Research Program of China; Projects(51678045, 51578052) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2016JBM032) supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fei, Wp., Song, Gh., Zhang, F. et al. Practical approach to determining traffic congestion propagation boundary due to traffic incidents. J. Cent. South Univ. 24, 413–422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3443-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3443-7

Key words

Navigation