Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-objective model for cordon-based congestion pricing schemes with nonlinear distance tolls

  • Geological, Civil, Energy and Traffic Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Congestion pricing is an important component of urban intelligent transport system. The efficiency, equity and the environmental impacts associated with road pricing schemes are key issues that should be considered before such schemes are implemented. This paper focuses on the cordon-based pricing with distance tolls, where the tolls are determined by a nonlinear function of a vehicles’ travel distance within a cordon, termed as toll charge function. The optimal tolls can give rise to: 1) higher total social benefits, 2) better levels of equity, and 3) reduced environmental impacts (e.g., less emission). Firstly, a deterministic equilibrium (DUE) model with elastic demand is presented to evaluate any given toll charge function. The distance tolls are non-additive, thus a modified path-based gradient projection algorithm is developed to solve the DUE model. Then, to quantitatively measure the equity level of each toll charge function, the Gini coefficient is adopted to measure the equity level of the flows in the entire transport network based on equilibrium flows. The total emission level is used to reflect the impacts of distance tolls on the environment. With these two indexes/measurements for the efficiency, equity and environmental issues as well as the DUE model, a multi-objective bi-level programming model is then developed to determine optimal distance tolls. The multi-objective model is converted to a single level model using the goal programming. A genetic algorithm (GA) is adopted to determine solutions. Finally, a numerical example is presented to verify the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MAY A D, LIU R, SHEPHERD S P, SUMALEE A. The impact of cordon design on the performance of road pricing schemes [J]. Transport Policy, 2002, 9(3): 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. HO H W, WONG S C, YANG H, LOO B P Y. Cordon-based congestion pricing in a continuum traffic equilibrium system [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2005, 39(7): 813–834.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LIU Zhi-yuan, WANG Shuai-an, MENG Qiang. Toll pricing framework under logit-based stochastic user equilibrium constraints [J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2013, 48(8): 1121–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LIU Zhi-yuan, WANG Shuai-an, MENG Qiang. Optimal joint distance and time toll for cordon-based congestion pricing [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2014, 69: 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LIU Zhi-yuan, MENG Qiang, WANG Shuai-an. Speed-based toll design for cordon-based congestion pricing scheme [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 31(2): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LIU Zhi-yuan, MENG Qiang. Bus-based park-and-ride system: a stochastic model on multimodal network with congestion pricing schemes [J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2014, 45(5): 994–1006.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. MENG Qiang, LIU Zhi-yuan, WANG Shuai-an. Optimal distance tolls under congestion pricing and continuously distributed value of time [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2012, 48(5): 937–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MAY A D, MILNE D S. Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2000, 34(6): 407–436.

    Google Scholar 

  9. JOU R C, CHIOU Y C, CHEN K H, TAN H I. Freeway drivers’ willingness-to-pay for a distance-based toll rate [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012, 46(3): 549–559.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LAWPHONGPANICH S, YIN Y. Nonlinear pricing on transportation networks [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2012, 20(1): 218–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MENG Qiang, LIU Zhi-yuan. Impact analysis of cordon-based congestion pricing on mode-split for a bimodal transportation network [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2012, 21(1): 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. JOU R C, YEH Y C. Freeway passenger car drivers’ travel choice behaviour in a distance-based toll system [J]. Transport Policy, 2013, 27: 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YANG Hai, HUANG Hai-jun. Mathematical and economic theory of road pricing [M]. Elsever, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SANTOS G. The London congestion charging scheme [M]// RICHARDSON H W, BAE C H C. Chapter 8: Road congestion pricing in Europe—Implications for the United States. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008: 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MENG Qiang, YANG Hai. Benefit distribution and equity in road network design [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2002, 36(1): 19–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. YANG Hai, ZHANG Xiao-ning. Multiclass network toll design problem with social and spatial equity constraints [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2002, 128(5): 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SUMALEE A, MAY T, SHEPHERD S. Comparison of judgmental and optimal road pricing cordons [J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(5): 384–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MARUYAMA T, SUMALEE A. Efficiency and equity comparison of cordon and area-based road pricing schemes using a trip-chain equilibrium model [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2007, 41(7): 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  19. YIN Y. Multiobjective bilevel optimization for transportation planning and management problems [J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2002, 36(1): 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. CHEN A, SUBPRASOM K, JI Z. A simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) procedure for BOT network design problem [J]. Optimization and Engineering, 2006, 7(3): 225–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. SHARMA S, MATHEW T V. Multiobjective network design for emission and travel-time trade-off for a sustainable large urban transportation network [J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2011, 38(3): 520–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. CHEN A, XU X D. Goal programming approach to solve the stochastic multi-objective network design problem [M]. Network Reliability in Practice. New York: Springer, 2012: 151–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. YIN Y, LI Z C, LAM W H K, CHOI K. Sustainable toll pricing and capacity investment in a congested road network: A goal programming approach [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2014, 140(12): 04014062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WANG Shuai-an, MENG Qiang, YANG Hai. Global optimization methods for the discrete network design problem [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2013, 50(4): 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. SHEFFI Y. Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods [M]. Prentice-Hall, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  26. JAYAKRISHNAN R, TSAI W T, PRASHKER J N, RAJADHYAKSHA S. A faster path-based algorithm for traffic assignment [J]. Transportation Research Reord, 1994, 1443: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  27. CHEN A, JAYAKRISHNAN R. A path-based gradient projection algorithm: effects of equilibration with a restricted path set under two flow update policies [M]. Irvine: University of California, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. DIAL R B. A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2006, 40(10): 917–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. LO H K, CHEN A. Traffic equilibrium problem with route-specific costs: formulation and algorithms [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2000, 34(6): 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. CHEN A, ZHOU Z, XU X. A self-adaptive gradient projection algorithm for the nonadditive traffic equilibrium problem [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2012, 39(2): 127–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. CHENG L, IIDA Y, UNO N, WANG W. Alternative quasi-newton methods for capacitated user equilibrium assignment [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003, 1857: 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. SHARMA S, MISHRA S. Intelligent transportation systems-enabled optimal emission pricing models for reducing carbon footprints in a bimodal network [J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2013, 17(1): 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. WALLACE C E, COURAGE K, REAVES D, SCHOENE G, EULER G. TRANSYT-7F user's manual [M]. Gainesville: University of Florida, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  34. SHEPHERD S, SUMALEE A. A genetic algorithm based approach to optimal toll level and location problems [J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2004, 4(2): 161–179.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. YANG Hai, ZHANG Xiao-ning, MENG Qiang. Modeling private highways in networks with entry–exit based toll charges [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(3): 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-ming Bie  (别一鸣).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(61304198, 61374195) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Projects(2013M530159, 2014T70351) supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Liu, Zy., Thompson, R.G. et al. A multi-objective model for cordon-based congestion pricing schemes with nonlinear distance tolls. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 1273–1282 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-0377-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-0377-4

Key words

Navigation