Abstract
To determine the onset and duration of contraflow evacuation, a multi-objective optimization (MOO) model is proposed to explicitly consider both the total system evacuation time and the operation cost. A solution algorithm that enhances the popular evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II is proposed to solve the model. The algorithm incorporates preliminary results as prior information and includes a meta-model as an alternative to evaluation by simulation. Numerical analysis of a case study suggests that the proposed formulation and solution algorithm are valid, and the enhanced NSGA-II outperforms the original algorithm in both convergence to the true Pareto-optimal set and solution diversity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
KIM S, SHEKHAR S, MIN M. Contraflow network reconfiguration for evacuation route planning [J]. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2008, 20(8): 1115–1129.
LV N, YAN X, XU K, WU C. Bi-level programming based contraflow optimization for evacuation events [J]. Kybernetes, 2010, 39(8): 1227–1234.
TUYDES H, ZIZIASKOPOULOS A. Tabu-based heuristic approach for optimization of network evacuation contraflow [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Researh Board, 2006, 1964(1): 157–168.
THEODOULOU G, WOLSHON B. Alternative methods to increase the effectiveness of freeway contraflow evacuation [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1865: 48–56.
WILLIAMS B, TAGLIAFERRI A, MEINHOLD S, HUMMER J, ROUPHAIL N. Simulation and analysis of freeway lane reversal for coastal hurricane evacuation [J]. ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2007, 133(1): 61–72.
SBAYTI H, MAHMASSANI H. Optimal scheduling of evacuation operations [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2006, 1964: 238–246.
CHIU Y, ZHENG H, VILLALOBOS J, PEACOCK W, HENK R. Evaluating regional contra-flow and phased evacuation strategies for Texas using a large-scale dynamic traffic simulation and assignment approach [J]. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2008, doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1409.
PEL A, BLIEMER M. Evacuation plan evaluation: Assessment of mandatory and voluntary vehicular evacuation schemes by means of an analytical dynamic traffic model [C]//The 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C: TRB, 2008: 08–2086.
YAO T, MANDALA S, CHUNG B. Evacuation transportation planning under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach [J]. Network Spatial and Economics, 2009, 9(2): 171–189.
NG M, WALLER T. Reliable evacuation planning via demand inflation and supply deflation [J]. Transportation Research, Part E, 2010, 46(6): 1086–1094.
MENG Q, KHOO H. Optimizing contraflow scheduling problem: model and algorithm [J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2008, 12(3): 126–138.
BACK T, HAMMEL U, SCHWEFEL H P. Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 1(1): 3–17.
LOU Y, FONSECA D, MOYNIHAN G, GURUPACKIAM S. Contraflow evacuation planning for I-65 in alabama [R]. Alabama University Transportation Center for Alabama, 2013.
LOU Y, LI P, FONSECA D, MOYNIHAN G, GURUPACKIAM S. Scheduling of contraflow evacuation: A case study of I-65 in alabama [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2014, In process.
ZIZLER E, THIELE L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength pareto approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 3(4): 257–271
HU H, GAO Y, YANG X. Multi-objective optimization method of fixed-time signal control of isolated intersections [C]//2010 International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences. Chengdu: IEEE, 2010: 1281–1284.
FIKSE K. Accelerating the search for optimal dynamic traffic management [D]. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente, 2011.
LAMOTTE R A, ALECSANDRU C. Fast multi-objective optimization for continuous network design problems based on gaussian process models [C]//The 93rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C: TRB, 2014: 14–1210.
LEE L H, CHEW E P, LI H. Multi-objective compass for discrete optimization via simulation [C]// 2011 Winter Simulation Conference. Phoenix: IEEE, 2011: 4070–4079.
XIANG Y, ARORA J S, RAHMATALLA S, MARLER T, BHATT R. Human lifting simulation using a multi-objective optimization approach [J]. Multibody Syst Dyn, 2010, 23 (4): 431–451.
LIU Y, CHANG G, LIU Y, LAI X. Corridor-based emergency evacuation system for Washington, D.C.: System development and case study [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2008, 2041: 58–67.
GULDMANN J M, KIM W. Urban transportation network design, traffic allocation, and air quality control: an integrated optimization approach [C]//European Regional Science Association 36th European Congress. Zurich: ERSA, 1996.
CHANKONG V, HAIMES Y. Multiobjective decision making theory and methodology [M]. New York: Elsevier, 1983.
CARAMIA M, DELL’OLMO P. Multi-objective management in freight logistics [M]. Now York: Springer, 2008.
CHARNES A, COOPER W, FERGUSON R. Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming [J]. Management Science, 1955, 1(1): 138–151.
LAUMANNS M, THIELE L, DEB K, ZITZLER E. Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 10(3): 263–282.
DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, MEYARIVAN T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197.
JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 23(1): 1–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Project(ADLT 930-809R) supported by the Alabama Department of Transportation, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Ph., Lou, Yy. An integer multi-objective optimization model and an enhanced non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for contraflow scheduling problem. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 2399–2405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2766-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2766-5