Skip to main content
Log in

An integer multi-objective optimization model and an enhanced non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for contraflow scheduling problem

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the onset and duration of contraflow evacuation, a multi-objective optimization (MOO) model is proposed to explicitly consider both the total system evacuation time and the operation cost. A solution algorithm that enhances the popular evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II is proposed to solve the model. The algorithm incorporates preliminary results as prior information and includes a meta-model as an alternative to evaluation by simulation. Numerical analysis of a case study suggests that the proposed formulation and solution algorithm are valid, and the enhanced NSGA-II outperforms the original algorithm in both convergence to the true Pareto-optimal set and solution diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KIM S, SHEKHAR S, MIN M. Contraflow network reconfiguration for evacuation route planning [J]. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2008, 20(8): 1115–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. LV N, YAN X, XU K, WU C. Bi-level programming based contraflow optimization for evacuation events [J]. Kybernetes, 2010, 39(8): 1227–1234.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. TUYDES H, ZIZIASKOPOULOS A. Tabu-based heuristic approach for optimization of network evacuation contraflow [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Researh Board, 2006, 1964(1): 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. THEODOULOU G, WOLSHON B. Alternative methods to increase the effectiveness of freeway contraflow evacuation [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2004, 1865: 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. WILLIAMS B, TAGLIAFERRI A, MEINHOLD S, HUMMER J, ROUPHAIL N. Simulation and analysis of freeway lane reversal for coastal hurricane evacuation [J]. ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2007, 133(1): 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. SBAYTI H, MAHMASSANI H. Optimal scheduling of evacuation operations [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2006, 1964: 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CHIU Y, ZHENG H, VILLALOBOS J, PEACOCK W, HENK R. Evaluating regional contra-flow and phased evacuation strategies for Texas using a large-scale dynamic traffic simulation and assignment approach [J]. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2008, doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1409.

    Google Scholar 

  8. PEL A, BLIEMER M. Evacuation plan evaluation: Assessment of mandatory and voluntary vehicular evacuation schemes by means of an analytical dynamic traffic model [C]//The 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C: TRB, 2008: 08–2086.

    Google Scholar 

  9. YAO T, MANDALA S, CHUNG B. Evacuation transportation planning under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach [J]. Network Spatial and Economics, 2009, 9(2): 171–189.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. NG M, WALLER T. Reliable evacuation planning via demand inflation and supply deflation [J]. Transportation Research, Part E, 2010, 46(6): 1086–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MENG Q, KHOO H. Optimizing contraflow scheduling problem: model and algorithm [J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2008, 12(3): 126–138.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. BACK T, HAMMEL U, SCHWEFEL H P. Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 1(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LOU Y, FONSECA D, MOYNIHAN G, GURUPACKIAM S. Contraflow evacuation planning for I-65 in alabama [R]. Alabama University Transportation Center for Alabama, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LOU Y, LI P, FONSECA D, MOYNIHAN G, GURUPACKIAM S. Scheduling of contraflow evacuation: A case study of I-65 in alabama [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2014, In process.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ZIZLER E, THIELE L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength pareto approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 3(4): 257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. HU H, GAO Y, YANG X. Multi-objective optimization method of fixed-time signal control of isolated intersections [C]//2010 International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences. Chengdu: IEEE, 2010: 1281–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. FIKSE K. Accelerating the search for optimal dynamic traffic management [D]. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. LAMOTTE R A, ALECSANDRU C. Fast multi-objective optimization for continuous network design problems based on gaussian process models [C]//The 93rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C: TRB, 2014: 14–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LEE L H, CHEW E P, LI H. Multi-objective compass for discrete optimization via simulation [C]// 2011 Winter Simulation Conference. Phoenix: IEEE, 2011: 4070–4079.

    Google Scholar 

  20. XIANG Y, ARORA J S, RAHMATALLA S, MARLER T, BHATT R. Human lifting simulation using a multi-objective optimization approach [J]. Multibody Syst Dyn, 2010, 23 (4): 431–451.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. LIU Y, CHANG G, LIU Y, LAI X. Corridor-based emergency evacuation system for Washington, D.C.: System development and case study [J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2008, 2041: 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. GULDMANN J M, KIM W. Urban transportation network design, traffic allocation, and air quality control: an integrated optimization approach [C]//European Regional Science Association 36th European Congress. Zurich: ERSA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. CHANKONG V, HAIMES Y. Multiobjective decision making theory and methodology [M]. New York: Elsevier, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CARAMIA M, DELL’OLMO P. Multi-objective management in freight logistics [M]. Now York: Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. CHARNES A, COOPER W, FERGUSON R. Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming [J]. Management Science, 1955, 1(1): 138–151.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. LAUMANNS M, THIELE L, DEB K, ZITZLER E. Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 10(3): 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, MEYARIVAN T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 23(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-yan Lou  (楼颖燕).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(ADLT 930-809R) supported by the Alabama Department of Transportation, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Ph., Lou, Yy. An integer multi-objective optimization model and an enhanced non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for contraflow scheduling problem. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 2399–2405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2766-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2766-5

Key words

Navigation