Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of mesh style and grid convergence on numerical simulation accuracy of centrifugal pump

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effects of mesh generation techniques and grid convergence on pump performance in centrifugal pump model, three widely used mesh styles including structured hexahedral, unstructured tetrahedral and hybrid prismatic/tetrahedral meshes were generated for a centrifugal pump model. And quantitative grid convergence was assessed based on a grid convergence index (GCI), which accounts for the degree of grid refinement. The structured, unstructured or hybrid meshes are found to have certain difference for velocity distributions in impeller with the change of grid cell number. And the simulation results have errors to different degrees compared with experimental data. The GCI-value for structured meshes calculated is lower than that for the unstructured and hybrid meshes. Meanwhile, the structured meshes are observed to get more vortexes in impeller passage. Nevertheless, the hybrid meshes are found to have larger low-velocity area at outlet and more secondary vortexes at a specified location than structured meshes and unstructured meshes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DAI Cui, KONG Fan-yu, DONG Liang. Pressure fluctuation and its influencing factors in circulating water pump [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20: 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DERAKHSHAN S, NOURBAKHSH A. Theoretical, numerical and experimental investigation of centrifugal pumps in reverse operation [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2008, 32(8): 1620–1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ZHU Xiao-hua, LI Jia-nan, TONG Hua. Mechanism analysis and process optimization of sand and plug removal with rotating jet in horizontal well [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20: 1631–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LIU Hou-lin, REN Yun, WANG Kai, WU Deng-hao, RU Wei-min, TAN Ming-gao. Research of inner flow in a double blades pump based on openfoam [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24: 226–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yl Qian. CFD Application in implantable Rotary blood pump design and validation [J]. Journal of Shanghai University (Natural Science), 2004, 10: 194–197. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CELIK I B, GHIA U, ROACHE P J. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(7): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. FREITAS C J. The issue of numerical uncertainty [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2002, 26(2): 237–248.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. ROACHE P J. Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1994, 116: 405–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. OBERKAMPF W L, TRUCANO T G. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(3): 209–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. RICHARDSON L F. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 1911, 210: 307–357.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. KARIMI M, AKDOGAN G, DELLIMORE K H, BRADSHAWA S M. Quantification of numerical uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics modelling of hydrocyclones [J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2012, 43: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ELSAYED K, LACOR C. The effect of cyclone inlet dimensions on the flow pattern and performance [J]. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2011, 35(4): 1952–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LIJO V, KIM H D, SETOGUCHI T. Analysis of choked viscous flows through a constant area duct [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2010, 224(11): 1151–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TANNEHILL J C, ANDERSON D D A, PLETCHER R H. Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, 1997: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. FERZIGER J H, PERIĆ M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics [M]. Berlin: Springer, 1996: 160.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. ZHOU Shui-qing, KONG Fan-yu, WANG Zhi-qiang, YI Chun-long, ZHANG Yong. Numerical simulation for low specific-speed centrifugal pump with structured grid [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(7): 66–69. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. LONGEST P, VINCHURKAR S. Effects of mesh style and grid convergence on particle deposition in bifurcating airway models with comparisons to experimental data [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2007, 29(3): 350–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LIU Y, PEKKAN K, JONES S C, YOGANATHAN A P. The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection [J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2004, 126(5): 594–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LIU Hou-lin, LIU Ming-ming, DONG Liang, DU Hui. Effects of grid types on numerical calculation accuracy of centrifugal pump [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(10): 64–67. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ROY C J. Grid convergence error analysis for mixed-order numerical schemes [J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(4): 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ROACHE P J. Computational fluid dynamics [M]. Albuquerque: Hermosa, 1976: 286–287.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China

    Hou-lin Liu  (刘厚林), Ming-ming Liu  (刘明明), Yu Bai  (白羽) & Liang Dong  (董亮)

Authors
  1. Hou-lin Liu  (刘厚林)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming-ming Liu  (刘明明)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Bai  (白羽)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liang Dong  (董亮)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hou-lin Liu  (刘厚林).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(51109095, 51179075, 51309119) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project(BE2012131) supported by Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Hl., Liu, Mm., Bai, Y. et al. Effects of mesh style and grid convergence on numerical simulation accuracy of centrifugal pump. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 368–376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2531-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2531-9

Key words

Search

Navigation