Skip to main content
Log in

Applications of texture attribute analysis to seismic interpretation

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first generation coherence algorithm (namely C1 algorithm) is based on the statistical cross-correlation theory, which calculates the coherency of seismic data along both in-line and cross-line. The work, based on texture technique, makes full use of seismic information in different directions and the difference of multi-traces, and proposes a novel methodology named the texture coherence algorithm for seismic reservoir characterization, for short TEC algorithm. Besides, in-line and cross-line directions, it also calculates seismic coherency in 45° and 135° directions deviating from in-line. First, we clearly propose an optimization method and a criterion which structure graylevel co-occurrence matrix parameters in TEC algorithm. Furthermore, the matrix to measure the difference between multi-traces is constructed by texture technique, resulting in horizontal constraints of texture coherence attribute. Compared with the C1 algorithm, the TEC algorithm based on graylevel matrix is of the feature that is multi-direction information fusion and keeps the simplicity and high speed, even it is of multi-trace horizontal constraint, leading to significantly improved resolution. The practical application of the TEC algorithm shows that the TEC attribute is superior to both the C1 attribute and amplitude attribute in identifying faults and channels, and it is as successful as the third generation coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CHOPRA S, MARFURT K J. Seismic attributes—A historical perspective [J]. Geophysics, 2005, 70(5): 3SO–28SO.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GRANA D, MUKERJI T, DVORKIN J, MAVKO G. Stochastic inversion of facies from seismic data based on sequential simulations and probability perturbation method [J]. Geophysics, 2012, 77(4): M53–M72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WANG Shang-xu, LI Xiang-yang, DI Bang-rang, BOOTH D. Reservoir fluid substitution effects on seismic profile interpretation: A physical modeling experiment [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2010, 37(10): L10306.

    Google Scholar 

  4. YUAN San-yi, WANG Shang-xu. Spectral sparse Bayesian learning reflectivity inversion [J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 61(4): 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. WANG Yang-hua. Reservoir characterization based on seismic spectral variations [J]. Geophysics, 2012, 77(6): M89–M97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. SARASWAT P, SEN M K. Artificial immune-based self-organizing maps for seismic-facies analysis [J]. Geophysics, 2012, 77(4): O45–O53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. BAHORICH S M, FARMER L S. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: The coherence cube [J]. The Leading Edge, 1995, 14(1): 1053–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MARFURT K J, KIRLIN R L, FARMER S L, BAHORICH S M. 3-D seismic attributes using a semblance-based coherency algorithm [J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(4): 1150–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MARFURT K J, SUDHAKER V, GERSZTENKORN A, CRAWFORD K D, NISSEN S N. Coherency calculations in the presence of structural dip [J]. Geophysics, 1999, 64(1): 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. HARALICK R M, SHANMUGAM K, DINSTEIN I. Textural features fro image classification [J]. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1973, SMC-3(6): 610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LIU Lang, CHEN Jian-hong, WANG Ge-ming, LAO De-zheng. Multi-attributed decision making for mining methods based on grey system and interval numbers [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(4): 1029–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WEST, B P, MAY S R, EASTWOOD J E, ROSSEN C. Interactive seismic facies classification using textural attributes and neural networks [J]. The Leading Edge, 2002, 21(10): 1042–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. GAO Deng-liang. 3D seismic volume visualization and interpretation: An integrated workflow with case studies [J]. Geophysics, 2009, 74(1): W1–W12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. YENUGU M, MARFURT K J, MATSON S. Seismic texture analysis for reservoir prediction and characterization [J]. The Leading Edge, 2010, 29(9): 1116–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MATOS M C, YENUGU M, ANGELO S M, MARFURT K J. Integrated seismic texture segmentation and cluster analysis applied to channel delineation and chert reservoir characterization [J] Geophysics, 2011, 76(5): 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. YUAN San-yi, WANG Shang-xu. Edge-preserving noise reduction based on Bayesian inversion with directional difference constraints [J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2013, 10(2), 25001–25010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-yu Chuai  (啜晓宇).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2013CB228600) supported by the National Basic Research Program of China; Project(2011A-3606) supported by the CNPC “12.5” Program of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chuai, Xy., Wang, Sx., Shi, Pd. et al. Applications of texture attribute analysis to seismic interpretation. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 3617–3626 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2344-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2344-2

Key words

Navigation