Skip to main content
Log in

Reservoir lithology stochastic simulation based on Markov random fields

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Markov random fields (MRF) have potential for predicting and simulating petroleum reservoir facies more accurately from sample data such as logging, core data and seismic data because they can incorporate interclass relationships. While, many relative studies were based on Markov chain, not MRF, and using Markov chain model for 3D reservoir stochastic simulation has always been the difficulty in reservoir stochastic simulation. MRF was proposed to simulate type variables (for example lithofacies) in this work. Firstly, a Gibbs distribution was proposed to characterize reservoir heterogeneity for building 3-D (three-dimensional) MRF. Secondly, maximum likelihood approaches of model parameters on well data and training image were considered. Compared with the simulation results of MC (Markov chain), the MRF can better reflect the spatial distribution characteristics of sand body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LI S Z. Modeling image analysis problems using Markov random fields [M]. Handbook of Statistics 21: Stochastic Process Modeling and Simulation. Boston: Elsevier, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BESAG J. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion) [J]. J ROY Stat Soc Ser B, 1974, 36(2): 192–236.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. ROBERT V, HOGG, ALLEN T, CRAIG. Introduction to mathematical statistics [M]. Beijing: Pearson Education Asia Limited and Higher Education Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. METROPOLIS N, ROSENBLUTH A W, ROSENBLUTH M N, TELLER A H, TELLER E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines [J]. J Chem Phys, 1953, 21(6): 1087–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BESAG J, KOOPERBERG C. On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions [J]. Biometrika, 1995, 82(4): 733–746.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. CROSS G C, JAIN A K. Markov random field texture models [J]. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Trans, 1983, 5(1): 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SALOMÃO M C, REMACRE A Z. The use of discrete Markov random fields in reservoir characterization [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2001, 32(2/4): 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. TJELMELAND H, BESAY J. Markov random fields with higher order interaction [R]. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ANDREW BLAKE, PUSHMEET KOHLI, CARSTEN ROTHER. Markov random fields for vision and image processing [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press, 2011: 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LI W. Markov chain random field for estimation of categorical variables [J]. Mathematical Geology, 2007, 39(3): 321–335.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. ELFEKI A, DEKKING M A. Markov chain model for subsurface characterization: Theory and applications [J]. Mathematical Geology, 2001, 33(5): 568–589.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. LI W, ZHANG C. Application of transiograms to Markov chain simulation and spatial uncertainty assessment of land-cover classes [J]. GISci Remote Sens, 2005, 42(4): 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LI W, ZHANG C, BURT J E, ZHU A X, FEYEN J. Two-dimensional Markov chain simulation of soil type spatial distribution [J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2004, 68(5): 1479–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HONARKHAH M, CAERS J. Stochastic simulation of patterns using distance-based pattern modeling [J]. Math Geosci, 2010, 42(5): 487–517.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. STRBELLE S. Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point geostatistics [J]. Mathematical Geology, 2002, 34(1): 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. LAFFERTY J, MCCALLUM A, PEREIRA F. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data [R]. San Francisco: University of Pennsylvania, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MCCALLUM A. Efficiently inducing features of conditional random fields [C]// In The 19th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI, San Francisco, 2003: 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  18. GEYER C J, MLLER J. Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes [J]. Scand J of Stat, 1994, 21(4): 359–373.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. HOPFIELD J J, TANK D W. Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems [J]. Biological Cybernetics, 1985, 52(3): 141–152.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. KOCH C, MARROQUIN J, YUILLE A. Analog neuronal networks in early vision [J]. Proc National Academy of Sciences, 1986, 83(12): 4263–4267

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. LAWRENCE K, SAUL L, JORDAN M. Exploiting tractable substructures in intractable networks [J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1996, 8: 486–492.

    Google Scholar 

  22. PEARL J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems [M]. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988: 231–285.

    Google Scholar 

  23. FREEMAN W T, PASZTOR E C, CARMICHAEL O T. Learning low-level vision [J]. Int J Computer Vision, 2000, 40(1): 25–47.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. FREY B J, KOETTER R, PETROVIC N. Very loopy belief propagation for unwrapping phase images [C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-ru Liang  (梁玉汝).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2011ZX05002-005-006) supported by the National “Twelveth Five Year” Science and Technology Major Research Program, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, Yr., Wang, Zz. & Guo, Jh. Reservoir lithology stochastic simulation based on Markov random fields. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 3610–3616 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2343-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2343-3

Key words

Navigation