Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of solids on pulp and froth properties in flotation

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Froth flotation is a widely used process of particle separation exploiting differences in surface properties. It is important to point out that overall flotation performance (grade and recovery) is a consequence of the quality and quantity of the solid particles collected from the pulp phase, transported into the froth phase, and surviving as bubble-particle aggregates into the overflow. This work will focus on studying these phenomena and will incorporate the effects of particle hydrophobicities in the 3-phase system. Solids are classed as either hydrophilic non-sulphide gangue (e.g. silica, talc), hydrophilic sulphide (e.g. pyrite), or hydrophobic sulphide (e.g. sphalerite). Talc is a surface-active species of gangue that has been shown to behave differently from silica (frother adsorbs on the surface of talc particles). Both are common components of ores and will be studied in detail. The focus of this work is to investigate the role of solids on pulp hydrodynamics, froth bubble coalescence intensity, water overflow rate with solids present, and in particular, the interactions between solids, frother and gas on the gas dispersion parameters. The results show that in the pulp zone there is no effect of solids on bubble size and gas holdup; in the froth zone, although hydrophilic particles solely do not effect on the water overflow rate, hydrophobic particles produce higher intensity of rates on water overflow and bubble coalescence, and many be attributed to the water reattachment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CROZIER R, KLIMPEL R. Frothing in flotation [M]. LASKOWSKI J S, Ed. Chapter 11, New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1989: 257–280.

  2. FINCH J A, DOBBY G S. Column flotation [M]. New York: Pergamon Press, 1990: 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  3. KLIMPEL R, ISHERWOOD S. Some industrial implications of changing frother chemical structure [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1991, 33: 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NESSET J E, ZHANG Wei, FINCH J A. A benchmarking tool for assessing flotation cell performance [C]// Proceedings of 44th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors (CIM). Ottawa, Canada: 2012: 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  5. LEJA J, SCHULMAN J H. Flotation theory: Molecular interactions between frothers and collectors at solid-liquid-air interfaces [J]. AIME Trans, 1954, 199: 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ZHANG Wei, ZHOU X, FINCH J A. Determining independent control of dual-frother systems-gas holdup, bubble size and water overflow rate [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2012, 39: 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. COMLEY B A, VERA M A, FRANZIDIS J P. Interpretation of the effect of frother type and concentration on flotation performance in an OK3 cell [J]. Mineral and Metallurgical Processing, 2007, 24(4): 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ZHANG Wei, NESSET J E, FINCH J A. Water recovery and bubble surface area flux in flotation [J]. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 2010, 49(4): 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ZHANG Wei, NESSET J E, RAO S R, FINCH J A. Characterizing frothers through critical coalescence concentration (CCC95)-hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) [J]. Minerals, 2012, 2(3): 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. STEVENSON P, STEVANOV C, JAMESON G J. Liquid overflow from a column of rising aqueous froth [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2003, 16(11): 1045–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ALEXANDER D, FRANZIDIS J P, MANLAPIG E. Froth recovery measurement in plant scale flotation cells [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2003, 16: 1197–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. SEAMAN D, FRANZIDIS J P, MANLAPIG E. Bubble load measurement in the pulp zone of industrial flotation machines-A new device for determining the froth recovery of attached particles [J]. International Journal of Minerals Processing, 2004, 74(1/2): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. BARBIAN N, HADLER K, CILLIERS J J. The froth stability column: Measuring froth stability at an industrial scale [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19: 713–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. SWEET C, VAN HOOGSTRATEN J, HARRIS M, LASKOWSKI J S. The effect of frothers on bubble size and frothability of aqueous solutions [C]// Proceedings of Complex Ores, Metallurgical Society of CIM, Montreal: 1997: 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CAPPUCCITTI F, NESSET J E. Frother and collector effects on flotation cell hydrodynamics and their implication on circuit performance [C]// Proceedings 48th Conference of Metallurgists of CIM. Sudbury: 2009: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG Wei, KOLAHDOOZAN M, NESSET J E, FINCH J A. Use of frother with sampling-for-imaging bubble sizing technique [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22(5): 513–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ZHANG Wei, ZHU S, FINCH J A. Frother partitioning in dual-frother systems: Development of analytical technique [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2013, 119: 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DAHLKE R C, GOMEZ C O, FINCH J A. Operating range of a flotation cell determined from gas holdup vs gas rate [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2005, 18(9): 977–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. GRAU R A, HEISKANEN K. Bubble size distribution in laboratory scale flotation cells [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2005, 18: 1164–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. QUINN J J. Exploring the effects of salts on gas dispersion and froth properties in flotation systems [D]. Montreal, Canda: McGill University, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ACUNA C, NESSET J E, FINCH J A. Impact of frother on bubble production and behavior in the pulp zone [C]// del VILLAR R, NESSET J E, GOMEZ C O, STRADING A W. Eds. Proceedings of the 6th International Copper Cobre Conference. Toronto, Canada: MetSoc CIM, 2007: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  22. KUAN S H, FINCH J A. Impact of talc on pulp and froth properties in F150 and 1-pentanol frother systems [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 23: 1003–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. BANISI S, FINCH J A, LAPLANTE A R, WEBER M. Effect of solid particles on gas holdup in flotation columns: I. Measurement [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1995, 50(14): 2329–2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MELO F, LASKOWSKI J S. Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(6/7/8): 766–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DIPPENAAR A. The destabilization of froth by solids I: the mechanisms of film rupture [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 1982, 9: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mining & Mineral Resources Division, Department of Business Administration, Chinalco China Copper Corporation Limited, Beijing, 100082, China

    Wei Zhang  (张炜)

  2. Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 0C5, Canada

    Wei Zhang  (张炜) & James A. Finch

Authors
  1. Wei Zhang  (张炜)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Finch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zhang  (张炜).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Finch, J.A. Effect of solids on pulp and froth properties in flotation. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 1461–1469 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2086-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-2086-1

Key words

Search

Navigation