Skip to main content
Log in

A novel approach to prevent bubble coalescence during measurement of bubble size in flotation

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effect of frothers in preventing bubble coalescence during flotation of minerals has long been investigated. To evaluate the performance of a frother, an apparatus to measure the bubble size is a basic necessity. McGill Bubble Size Analyzer (MBSA) or bubble viewer that has been developed and completed by McGill University’s Mineral Processing Group during the last decade is a unique instrument to serve this purpose. Two parameters which are thought to influence the bubble size measurements by McGill bubble viewer include water quality and frother concentration in the chamber. Results show that there is no difference in Sauter mean (D 32) when tap or de-ionized water was used instead of process water. However, the frother concentration, in this research DowFroth 250 (DF250), inside the chamber exhibited a pronounced effect on bubble size. Frother concentration below a certain point can not prevent coalescence inside the chamber and therefore caution must be taken in plant applications. It was also noted that the frother concentration which has been so far practiced in plant measurements (CCC75-CCC95) is high enough to prevent coalescence with the bubble viewer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HARRIS C C. Flotation machines [M]. Fuerstenau, M.C. (Ed.), A.M. Gaudin Memorial Volume, Vol. 2, SME of AIME, 1976, 753–815.

  2. METSO MINERALS CBT (Computer Based Training). Mill Operator Training Package: Flotation Module [R]. Formerly Brenda Process Technology CBT (Computer Based Training), 1996.

  3. CHO Y S, LASKOWSKI J S. Effect of flotation frothers on bubble size and foam stability [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2002, 64: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NESSET J E, FINCH J A, GOMEZ C O. Operating variables affecting the bubble size in forced-air mechanical flotation machines [C]// Proceedings of Ninth Mill Operators’ Conference. Fremantle, WA, 2007: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FINCH J A, NESSET J E, ACUNA C. Role of frother on bubble production and behaviour in flotation [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2008, 21(12/13/14): 949–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR J R, GOMEZ C O, FINCH J A. A technique for the direct measurement of bubble size distribution in industrial flotation cells [C]// Proceedings 2002-34th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors (CIM). Ottawa, ON, 2002: 389–402.

    Google Scholar 

  7. GRAU R A, HEISKANEN K. Visual technique for measuring bubble size in flotation systems [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2002, 15: 507–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BAILEY M, TORREALBA-VARGAS J, GOMEZ C O, FINCH J A. Coalescence of bubbles sampled for imaging [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2005, 18: 125–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MALYSA K, KRASOWSKA M, KRZAN M. Influence of surface active substances on bubble motion and collision with various interfaces [J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 114–115: 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McGill gas dispersion set-up and operation manual [R]. Montreal, QC: Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, 2006.

  11. TSE K L, MARTIN T, MCFARLANE C M, NIENOW A W. Small bubble formation via a coalescence dependent break-up mechanism [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58: 1497–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ACUNA C, NESSET J E, FINCH J A. Impact of frother on bubble production and behaviour in the pulp zone [C]// Eds. R del Villar, J. E. Nesset, C. O. Gomez and A. W. Stradling. Proceedings of the 6th International Copper-Cobre Conference, Volume II Mineral Processing. Toronto, ON, Canada: MetSoc CIM, 2007: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PYECHA J, SIMS S, LACOUTURE B, HOPE G, STRADLING A. Evaluation of a microcel sparger in the Red Dog column flotation cells [C]// Centenary of Flotation Symposium. Brisbane, 2005: 1017–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LIZAMA H M, CARRION J, ESTRELLA D. Improvements in column flotation through the use of MicrocelTM spargers at Antamina [C]// Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors (CIM). Ottawa, 2008: 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  15. GOMEZ C O, FINCH J A. Gas dispersion measurements in flotation cells [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2007, 84: 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zhang  (张炜).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project supported by the Chair in Mineral Processing at McGill University, under the Collaborative Research and Development Program of NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) with industrial sponsorship from Vale, Teck Cominco, Xstrata Process Support, Agnico-Eagle, Shell Canada, Barrick Gold, COREM, SGS Lakefield Research and Flottec

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Nesset, J.E. & Finch, J.A. A novel approach to prevent bubble coalescence during measurement of bubble size in flotation. J. Cent. South Univ. 21, 338–343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-1945-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-014-1945-0

Key words

Navigation