Skip to main content
Log in

Ability of rotary compactor in compacting consistent slabs and effect of rotary compaction on engineering properties of stone mastic asphalt mixtures

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new automatic rotary compactor and its abilities in compacting stone mastic asphalt (SMA) are presented. Following an overview of the rotary compactor and the compaction procedure, it is demonstrated that the rotary compactor is able to produce uniform slabs with the desired thickness of 65 mm all over around. Furthermore, 132 cored samples from the rotary compactor had been compacted uniformly with approximately 4% optimum air void content. In addition, performance tests results indicate that the rotary compactor produces asphalt mixtures with the requirements of resilient modulus, Marshall stability and flow. A weight factor was introduced for each fraction of aggregates in the degradation analysis to compensate the crushing effect of aggregates during mixing and compacting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KHAN Z A, WAHAB H I, ASI I, RAMADHAN R. Comparative study of asphalt concrete laboratory compaction methods to simulate field compaction [J]. Construction and Building Materials. 1998, 12: 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. HARTMAN A M, GILCHRIST M D, WALSH G. Effect of mixture compaction on indirect tensile stiffness and fatigue [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2001, 127: 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MAUPIN J R G W. Comparison of several asphalt design methods [R]. Virginia: Virginia Transportation Research Council, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. CONSUEGRA A, LITTLE D N, von QUINTUS H, BURATI J. Comparative evaluation of laboratory compaction devices based on their ability to produce mixture with engineering properties similar to those produced in the field [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1989, 1228: 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. KHOSLA N P, SADASIVAM S. Evaluation of the effect of mixture properties and compaction methods on the predicted performance of superpave mixtures [D]. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BAHIA H U, COENEN A, TABATABAEE N. Mixture design and compaction: Advances in interlaboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials [R]. RILEM: State-of-the-Art Reports, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. BUTTON J W, LITTLE D N, JAGADAM V, PENDELTON O J. Correlation of selected laboratory compaction methods with field compaction [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1994, 1454: 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SOUSA J B, DEACON J A, MONISMITH C L. Effect of laboratory compaction on permanent deformation characteristics of asphalt-aggregate mixtures [J]. Journal of the Association of Asphalt paving Technologists, 1991, 60: 533–585.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SOUSA J B, WAY G, HARVEY J T, HINES M. Comparison of mix design concepts [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1995, 1492: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO 15552:2004. Pneumatik fluid power-Cylinders with detachable mountings, 1 000 kPa (10 bar) series, bores from 32 mm to 320 mm-Basic, mounting and accessories dimensions [S].

  11. NAPA. Designing and constructing sma mixtures-state-of-the-practice [R]. Lanham: National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. NCHRP. A manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary [R]. Washington D.C.: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. TER HUERNE H L. Compaction of asphalt road pavements using finite elements and critical state theory [D]. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. GELLER M. Compaction equipment for asphalt mixtures. Placement and Compaction of Asphalt Mixtures [R]. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, Special Technical Publication 829, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. RICHARDSON J. Stone mastic asphalt in the UK [M]. London: Society of Chemical Industry, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MAHREZ A, KARIM M R, KATMAN H. Fatigue and deformation properties of glass fiber reinforced bituminous mixes [J]. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2005, 6: 997–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ROBERTS F L, KANDHAL P S, BROWN E R, LEE D, KENNEDY T W. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction [M]. Maryland: National Asphalt Pavement Association, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM D4123-82. Standard Test Method for Indirect Tension Test for Resilient Modulus of Bituminous Mixtures [S].

  19. ASTM D2172. Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of bitumen from bituminous paving mixtures [S].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ratnasamy Muniandy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muniandy, R., Haghighi, H., Hassim, S.b. et al. Ability of rotary compactor in compacting consistent slabs and effect of rotary compaction on engineering properties of stone mastic asphalt mixtures. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 3754–3763 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1904-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1904-1

Key words

Navigation