Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic stability of reinforced soil walls under bearing capacity failure by pseudo-dynamic method

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the seismic stability of reinforced soil walls against bearing capacity failure, the seismic safety factor of reinforced soil walls was determined by using pseudo-dynamic method, and calculated by considering different parameters, such as horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficients, ratio of reinforcement length to wall height, back fill friction angle, foundation soil friction angle, soil-reinforcement interface friction angle and surcharge. The parametric study shows that the seismic safety factor increases by 24-fold when the foundation soil friction angle varies from 25° to 45°, and increases by 2-fold when the soil-reinforcement interface friction angle varies from 0 to 30°. That is to say, the bigger values the foundation soil and/or soil-reinforcement interface friction angles have, the safer the reinforced soil walls become in the seismic design. The results were also compared with those obtained from pseudo-static method. It is found that there is a higher value of the safety factor by the present work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FHWA-NHI-00-043. Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes, design and construction guidelines [S]. Washington, DC, US: Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BASHA B M, BASUDHAR P K. Pseudo static seismic stability analysis of reinforced soil structures [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28(6):745–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S S, MANDAL J N. External stability of reinforced soil walls under seismic conditions [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2007, 14(4): 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. STEEDMAN R S, ZENG X. The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(1): 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ZENG X, STEEDMAN R S. On the behaviour of quay walls in earthquakes [J]. Geotechnique, 1993, 43(3): 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S S. Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Geotechnique, 2005, 55(9): 699–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S S. Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(5): 1103–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CHOUDHURY D, NIMBALKAR S S. Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudo-dynamic method: Passive case [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(3): 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NIMBALKAR S S, CHOUDHURY D. Sliding stability and seismic design of retaining wall by pseudo-dynamic method for passive case [J]. Soil Dynamic Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(6): 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. GHOSH P. Seismic passive earth pressure behind non-vertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2007, 25(6): 693–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. GHOSH P. Seismic active earth pressure behind a nonvertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(9): 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. GHOSH S. Pseudo-dynamic active force and pressure behind battered retaining wall supporting inclined backfill [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1226–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. WANG Kui-hua, MA Shao-jun, WU Wen-bing. Pseudo-dynamic analysis of overturning stability of retaining wall [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(6): 2085–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DAS B M, RAMANA G V. Principles of soil dynamics. 2nd Ed [M]. Connecticut: Stamford, Cengage Learning, 2010: 1–563.

    Google Scholar 

  15. PRAKASH S. Soil dynamics [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981: 1–450.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SHUKLA S K, GUPTA S K, SIVAKUGAN N. Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c-ϕ soil backfill under seismic loading condition [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(5): 690–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SHUKLA S K. Dynamic active thrust from c-ϕ soil backfills [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(3): 526–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. SHUKLA S K, HABIBI D. Dynamic passive pressure from c-ϕ soil backfills [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(5/6): 845–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. RICHARDS R, ELMS D G, BUDHU M. Dynamic fluidization of soils [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(5): 740–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-bo Ruan  (阮晓波).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruan, Xb., Sun, Sl. Seismic stability of reinforced soil walls under bearing capacity failure by pseudo-dynamic method. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 2593–2598 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1773-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1773-7

Key words

Navigation