Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear analysis of pounding between decks of multi-span bridge subjected to multi-support and multi-dimensional earthquake excitation

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nonlinear analysis of pounding between bridge deck segments subjected to multi-support excitations and multi-dimensional earthquake motion was performed. A novel bottom rigid element (BRE) method of the current displacement input model for structural seismic analysis under the multi-support excitations was used to calculate structural dynamic response. In the analysis, pounding between adjacent deck segments was considered. The seismic response of a multi-span bridge subjected to the multi-support excitation, considering not only the traveling-wave effect and partial coherence effect, but also the seismic non-stationary characteristics of multi-support earthquake motion, was simulated using finite element method (FEM). Meanwhile, the seismic response of the bridge under uniform earthquake was also analyzed. Finally, comparative analysis was conducted and some calculation results were shown for pounding effect, under multi-dimensional and multi-support earthquake motion, when performing seismic response analysis of multi-span bridge. Compared with the case of uniform/multi-support/multi-support and multi-dimensional earthquake input, the maximum values of pounding force in the case of multi-support and multi-dimensional earthquake input increase by about 5–8 times; the absolute value of bottom moment and shear force of piers increase by about 50%–600% and 23.1%–900%, respectively. A conclusion can be given that it is very necessary to consider the pounding effect under multi-dimensional and multi-support earthquake motion while performing seismic response analysis of multi-span bridge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. YE Ji-hong, SUN Jian-mei. Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitation [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2007, 24(1): 47–53. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. SHEHATA E A R. Pounding mitigation and unseating prevention at expansion joints of isolated multi-span bridges [J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(10): 2345–2356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. SHEHATA E A R, TOSHIRO H, UWE D. Ground motion spatial variability effects on seismic response control of cable-stayed bridges [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2011, 10(1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. KAIMING B, HONG H, NAWAWI C. Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and SSI on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(9): 1027–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DENG Yu-lin, HE Xiong-jun. Effect of pounding at expansion joints on seismic response of long-span suspension bridge under strong earthquakes [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 163–167: 4373–4377.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SHEHATA E, TOSHIRO H, UWE E D. Earthquake ground motion spatial variation effects on seismic response control of cable-stayed bridges [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 55A: 709–718.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ANAT R, KAZUHIKO K. Relative displacement response spectra with pounding effect [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2001, 31(10): 1511–1538.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SHEHATA E A R, TOSHIRO H. Seismic protection of cable-stayed bridges under multiple-support excitations [C]// KYRIAZIS D P. 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Thessaloniki, Greece: Springer, 2007: 1361.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SHEHATA E A R, UWE E D, TOSHIRO H. Friction based semi-active control of cable-stayed bridges [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 53A: 428–438.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LIU Guo-huan, LI Hong-nan, GUO Wei. An effective and practical method for solving an unnegligible problem inherent in the current calculation model for multi-support seismic analysis of structures [J]. Science China, 2010, 53(7): 1774–1784.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. SHEHATA E A R, TOSHIRO H, UWE E D. Spatial variation effects on seismic response control of cable-stayed bridges [C]// 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing: the Seismological Press of China, 2008: 05-02-0015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. WILSON E L. Static and dynamic analysis of structures: A physical approach with emphasis on earthquake engineering [M]. Berkley, California: Computer and Structures, Inc, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. JANKOWSKI R, WILDE K, FUJINO Y. Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquake [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(5): 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. JANKOWSKI R, WILDE K, FUJINO Y. Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(2): 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. HAO H, DUAN X N. Seismic response of asymmetric structures to multiple ground motions [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1995, 121(11): 1557–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. SHEN Shi-zhao, XU Chong-bao, ZHAO Chen. Design of suspension structure [M]. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 1997. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai Zhang  (张海).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(51078242) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Jiao, L. & Lin, Jn. Nonlinear analysis of pounding between decks of multi-span bridge subjected to multi-support and multi-dimensional earthquake excitation. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 2546–2554 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1767-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1767-5

Key words

Navigation