Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment criteria for nonverbal interaction contents in r-learning

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

r-learning, which is based on e-learning and u-learning, is defined as a learning support system that intelligent robots serve verbal and nonverbal interactions on ubiquitous computing environment. In order to guarantee the advantages of r-learning contents with no limits of time and place and with nonverbal interaction which are not in e-learning contents, in recent years, assessment criteria for r-learning contents are urgently required. Therefore, the reliable and valid assessment criteria were developed for nonverbal interaction contents in r-learning, and its detailed research content is as follows. First, assessment criteria for nonverbal interaction in r-learning contents will be specified into gesture, facial expression, semi-verbal message, distance, physical contact and time. Second, the validity of the developed assessment criteria will be proved by statistics. Consequently, the assessment criteria for nonverbal interaction contents will be helpful when choosing the better r-learning content and producing the better r-learning content, and the reliability of school education is improved ultimately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paro Robots Intelligent System. Seal-type therapeutic robot. [EB/OL]. [2010-10-01] http://www.paro.jp.

  2. KIESLER S, GOETZ J. Mental models and cooperation with robotic assistants [C]// Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, CHI 02. Mineapolis, MN: CHI 2002: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. KANDA T, HIRANO T, EATON D, ISHIGURO H. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children [J]. A Field Trial, Human Computer Interaction, 2004, 19: 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HAN J, JO M, PARK S, KIM S. The educational use of home robots for children [C]// Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2005), Nashville, TN, USA: IEEE, 2005: 378–383.

    Google Scholar 

  5. KIM Byeong-jun, HAN Jeong-hye. Analysis on psychological and educational effects in children and home robot interaction [J]. Journal of Korea Association of Information Education, 2005, 9(3): 387–395.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. JEONG Jaeg-yeong, CHOI Jong-hong, HAN Jeong-hye. Analysis on Children’s response depending on teaching assistant robots’ styles [J]. Journal of Korea Association of Information Education, 2007, 11(2): 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. LEE Seung-min, HAN Jeong-hye. Development of elementary English learning contents using a hybrid intelligent robot and their application [J]. Journal of Korea Association of information Education, 2004, 8(2): 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  8. KIM Geonhui, LEE Hyosin, JANG Sujeong, GU Hyeonjin. The reaction of children labeled with autism through interactions with robot [J]. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 2010, 26(10): 331–353.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CHENG Z, SUN S, KANSEN M, HUANG T, HE A. A personalized ubiquitous education support environment by comparing learning instructional requirement with learner’s behavior [C]// AINA 2005. 19th International Conference Taipei; IEEE 2005: 567–573.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HAN Jeong-hye, JO Mi-heon. Robot-Assisted Learning in r-learning [J]. Journal of Korea Association of Information Education, 2009, 13(4): 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LIM Jaeh-yeon, KIM Chi-su, JUN Byeong-ho, LEE Se-jin, KIM Won-hyeong, KIM Yong. A study on the quality management of educational contents [R]. Research Paper of Korea Education & Research Information Service, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. TOSHIKI I, NEC. Analysis on children’s images of robots in terms of clinical psychology-how children perceive robots changes in children’s images of robots after their Interaction with Robots? [R]. Tokyo: NEC, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LITTLEJOHN S W. Theories of human communication [M]. Long Grove, USA: Waveland Press, Inc, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LIM Chilseong. Interpersonal relations and Communication [M]. Seoul: Jimmundang Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. BIDWHISTELL R L. Kinesics and context: essays on body motion communication [M]. Seoul: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  16. LEE Changdeok, LIM Chilseong, SIM Yeongtaek, Won Jinsuk. Life and Speech [M]. Philadelphia Bagijeong Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MEST. 2007’s Revised Korean Language Curriculum Guide for middle school [M]. Seoul: Daehan Printing & Publishing Co., Ltd, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. STWART J, LOGAN C E. Together: Communication interpersonally [M]. NY: Mcgraw Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. CHAN L K, COLE P G. Teaching Principles and Practice [M]. NY: Prentice Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ADLER P B, ASLER ROSENFELD L B, PROCTOR R F. Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication [M]. NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. LEE Changdeok, MIN Byeonggon, PARK Changgyun, LEE Jeongu, KIM Juyeong. Teacher’s Speech [M]. Seoul: Tekeubil.Com Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Argyle M. Bodily Communication [M] (2nd ed.), Madison: International Universities Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  23. KIM Uryong, JANG Sowon. Non-verbal Communication [M]. Seoul: Nanam Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-yun Lee.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2011) supported by the research grant of the Chungbuk National University, South Korea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, Jh., Lee, Jy. & Yoon, Hs. Assessment criteria for nonverbal interaction contents in r-learning. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 2388–2398 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1748-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1748-8

Key words

Navigation