Skip to main content
Log in

Comparisons of three data storage models in parametric temporal databases

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The parametric temporal data model captures a real world entity in a single tuple, which reduces query language complexity. Such a data model, however, is difficult to be implemented on top of conventional databases because of its unfixed attribute sizes. XML is a matured technology and can be an elegant solution for such challenge. Representing data in XML trigger a question about storage efficiency. The goal of this work is to provide a straightforward answer to such a question. To this end, we compare three different storage models for the parametric temporal data model and show that XML is not worse than any other approaches. Furthermore, XML outperforms the other storages under certain conditions. Therefore, our simulation results provide a positive indication that the myth about XML is not true in the parametric temporal data model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ELMASRI R, KOURAMAJIAN V, FERNANDO S. Temporal database modeling: An object-oriented approach [C]// Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Washington, DC, USA, 1993: 574–585.

    Google Scholar 

  2. JENSEN C S, CLIFFORD J, GADIA S K, SEGEV A, SNODGRASS R T. A glossary of temporal database concepts [J]. SIGMOD Record, 1992, 21(3): 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. SNODGRASS R T. The temporal query language TQuel [J]. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1987, 12(2): 247–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. TANSEL A U, CLIFFORD J, GADIA S K, SEGEV A, SNODGRASS R T. Temporal databases: Theory, design, and implementation [M]. San Francisco, CA, USA, Benjamin/Cummings, 1993: 28–66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. GADIA S K, VAISHNAV J H. A query language for a homogeneous temporal database [C]// Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. Oregon, USA, 1985: 51–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. NOH Seo-Young, GADIA S K, JANG HAENGJIN. Storage cost comparisons in parametric temporal databases [C]// The 2nd International Conference on Convergence Technology. Qingdao, China, 2012: 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. NOH Seo-Young, GADIA S K. A Model comparison for spatiotemporal data in ubiquitous environments: A case study [J]. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 2011, 7(4): 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. NOH Seo-Young, GADIA S K. Benchmarking temporal database models with interval-based and temporal element-based timestamping [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2008, 81(6): 1931–1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. JENSEN C S, SNODGRASS R T, SOO M D. The tsql2 data model [M]// The TSQL2 Temporal Query Language. Kluwer, 1995: 153–238.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. NOH Seo-Young, GADIA S K, MA shi-he. An XML-based methodology for parametric temporal database model implementation [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2008, 81(11): 929–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. WANG F, ZANIOLO C. XBit: An XML-based bitemporal data model [C]// Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. Shanghai, China, 2004: 810–824.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SHARMA S, GADIA S K. On analyzing the degree of coldness in Iowa, a north central region, United States: An XML exploitation in spatial databases [C]// Proceedings of Conference on Network Security and Applications. 2010: 613–624.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. GADIA S K. A homogeneous relational model and query languages for temporal databases [J]. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1988, 13(4): 418–448.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. GADIA S K, NAIR S S. Temporal databases: A prelude to parametric data [M]// Temporal databases: Theory, design, and implementation. San Francisco, CA, USA, Benjamin/Cummings, 1993: 28–66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. TANSEL A U, CLIFFORD J, GADIA S K, SEGEV A, SNODGRASS R T. A glossary of temporal database concepts [M]// Temporal databases: Theory, design, and implementation. San Francisco, CA, USA, Benjamin/Cummings, 1993: 92–109.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SNODGRASS R T. Temporal object-oriented databases: A critical comparison [M]// Modern database systems. New York, NY, USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1995: 386–408.

    Google Scholar 

  17. BERTINO E, BEVILACQUA, FERRARI E, G G. Approaches to handling temporal data in object-oriented database [R]. Technical Report 192-97. Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Informazion, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. NOH S Y, GADIA S K. The usability of XML in parametric databases for temporal data [C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Engineering. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2005, 113-119.

  19. NOH Seo-Young, GADIA S K. A comparison of two approaches to utilizing XML in parametric databases for temporal data [J]. Information and Software Technology, 2006, 48(9): 807–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. PATANROI D. Binary page implementation of a canonical native storage for XML [D]. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ZHANG Sheng, CHEN Sha, LIANG Yu-ping. CGT code-based XML data compression method [C]// Second International Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE, 2009, 456-459.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haengjin Jang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noh, SY., Gadia, S.K. & Jang, H. Comparisons of three data storage models in parametric temporal databases. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 1919–1927 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1691-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1691-8

Key words

Navigation