Skip to main content
Log in

Attitude controller for reentry vehicles using state-dependent Riccati equation method

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To get better tracking performance of attitude command over the reentry phase of vehicles, the use of state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) method for attitude controller design of reentry vehicles was investigated. Guidance commands are generated based on optimal guidance law. SDRE control method employs factorization of the nonlinear dynamics into a state vector and state dependent matrix valued function. State-dependent coefficients are derived based on reentry motion equations in pitch and yaw channels. Unlike constant weighting matrix Q, elements of Q are set as the functions of state error so as to get satisfactory feedback and eliminate state error rapidly, then formulation of SDRE is realized. Riccati equation is solved real-timely with Schur algorithm. State feedback control law u(x) is derived with linear quadratic regulator (LQR) method. Simulation results show that SDRE controller steadily tracks attitude command, and impact point error of reentry vehicle is acceptable. Compared with PID controller, tracking performance of attitude command using SDRE controller is better with smaller control surface deflection. The attitude tracking error with SDRE controller is within 5°, and the control deflection is within 30°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KEVIN A W. A trade study on missile autopilot design using optimal control theory [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. South Carolina, USA: AIAA, 2007: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. JAMES R C DONALD T S. Dynamic conversion of flight path angle commands to body attitude commands [C]// Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Anchorage, USA: IEEE, 2002: 221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ANTONIOS T, BRAIN A W. Nonlinear flight control design for a STT missile [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Montreal, Canada: AIAA, 2001: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ANTONIOS T, BRAIN A W. Adaptive flight control design for nonlinear missiles [J]. Control Eng Pract, 2005, 13(1): 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  5. XIN M, BALAKRISHNAN S N. Nonlinear H∞ vehicle longitudinal autopilot design with Θ-D method [J]. IEEE Aero El Sys Mag, 2008, 44(1): 41–56.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. KEVIN P B MICHAEL W O DAVID D D. Optimal guidance command generation and tracking for reusable launch vehicle reentry [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Colorado, USA: AIAA, 2006: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. COSTA R R CHU Q P MUDLER J A. Reentry flight controller design using nonlinear dynamic inversion [J]. Journal of Spacecraft Rockets, 2003, 40(1): 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. PUKDEBOON C, ZINOBER A. Optimal sliding mode controllers for attitude tracking of spacecraft [C]// Proceedings of 18th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Saint Petersburg, Russia: IEEE, 2009: 1708–1713.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DONGSOO C, SEONHYEOK K, KIM H J TAHK M J. Adaptive dynamic surface control based on neural network for missile autopilot [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Portland, USA: AIAA, 2011: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ANTONIOS T, RAFAL Z, BRAIN A W. Robust autopilot for a quasi-linear parameter-varying vehicle model [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2001, 24(2): 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. VADDI S S MENON P K OHLMEYER E J. Numerical SDRE approach for vehicle integrated guidance-control [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Hilton Head, USA: AIAA, 2007: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. PEARSON J D. Approximation methods in optimal control [J]. J Electron Control, 1962, 13(2): 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. JAMES R C. State-dependent Riccati equation techniques: An overview [C]// Proceedings of American Control Conference. Albuquerque, USA: IEEE, 1997: 932–936.

    Google Scholar 

  14. JAMES R C DONALD T S. Nonlinear, hybrid bank-to-turn skid-to-turn missile autopilot design [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Montreal, Canada: AIAA, 2001: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. JAMES R C PETER H Z. Hypersonic guidance via the state-dependent Riccati equation control method [C]// Proceedings of 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Hawaii, USA: IEEE, 1999: 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  16. DONALD T S JAMES R C. Nonlinear control of satellite formation flight [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Denver, USA: AIAA, 2000: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. SUN Ping, LIU Kun. Vehicle autopilot design based on state dependent Riccati equation [C]// Proceedings of 2009 International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation, and Robotics. Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE, 2009: 134–138.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. RAMA K Y PRAVEEN S, DAVID B D. Combining state dependent Riccati equation approach with dynamic inversion: Application to control of flight vehicles [R]. Ohio: Air Force Research Laboratory, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ASHWINI R, DEBASISH G. State-dependent Riccati equation based guidance law for impact-angle constrained trajectories [J]. J Guid Control Dynam, 2009, 32(1): 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MENON P K OHLMEYER E J. Integrated design of agile vehicle guidance and control system [C]// Proceedings of 7th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation. Haifa, Israel: MCCA, 1999: 1469–1494.

    Google Scholar 

  21. BRADLEY A S PANAGIOTIS T. A State-dependent Riccati equation approach to atmospheric entry guidance [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Toronto, Canada: AIAA, 2010: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. ANDREA B, MARIO I. A Newton algorithm for implementation of SDRE controllers [C]// Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. San Francisco, USA: AIAA, 2005: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MENON P K, LAM T, CRAWFORD L S. Real-time computational methods for SDRE nonlinear control of vehicles [C]// Proceedings of 2002 American Control Conference. Anchorage, USA: ACC, 2002: 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ZHAO Han-yuan. Dynamics and guidance of reentry vehicles [M]. Changsha: Press of National University and Defense Technology, 1997: 89–98. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. CHEN Heng-nian. Control system design [M]. Beijing: Press of Astronautics, 1996: 330–332. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. QIAN Xing-fang. Missile dynamics [M]. Beijing: Press of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2008: 36–48. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. HOU Ming-zhe, DUAN G R. Integrated guidance and control of homing missiles against ground fixed targets [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2008, 21(2): 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. HOU Ming-zhe. Integrated guidance and control for homing missiles [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010: 17–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dao-cheng Xie  (谢道成).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(51105287) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, Dc., Wang, Zw. & Zhang, Wh. Attitude controller for reentry vehicles using state-dependent Riccati equation method. J. Cent. South Univ. 20, 1861–1867 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1684-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1684-7

Key words

Navigation