Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study of different theories on active earth pressure

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determination of distribution and magnitude of active earth pressure is crucial in retaining wall designs. A number of analytical theories on active earth pressure were presented. Yet, there are limited studies on comparison between the theories. In this work, comparison between the theories with finite element analysis is done using the PLAXIS software. The comparative results show that in terms of distribution and magnitude of active earth pressure, RANKINE’s theory possesses the highest match to the PLAXIS analysis. Parametric studies were also done to study the responses of active earth pressure distribution to varying parameters. Increasing soil friction angle and wall friction causes decrease in active earth pressure. In contrast, active earth pressure increases with increasing soil unit weight and height of wall. RANKINE’s theory has the highest compatibility to finite element analysis among all theories, and utilization of this theory leads to proficient retaining wall design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DAS B M. Principles of foundation engineering [M]. 7th ed. Singapore: International Thomson Publishing Asia, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BOWLES J E. Foundation analysis and design [M]. 5th ed. Singapore, McGraw-Hill, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. TERZAGHI K. A fundamental fallacy in earth pressure computations [J]. Journal of Boston Society of Civil Engineers, 1936, 23: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ROSCOE K H. The influence of strains in soil mechanics [J]. Geotechnique, 1970, 20(2): 129–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DUBROVA G A. Intersection of soil and structures [M]. Moscow, Izd. Rechnoy Transport, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. WANG Y Z. Distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall [J]. Geotechnique, 2000, 50(1): 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. PAIK K H, SALGADO R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects [J]. Geotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. GOEL S, PATRA N R. Effect of arching on active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls considering translation mode [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 8(2): 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. TERZAGHI K. Theoretical soil mechanics [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HAZARIKA H, MATSUZAWA H. Wall displacement modes dependant active earth pressure analyses using shear band method with two bands [J]. Computer and Geotechnics, 1996, 19(3): 193–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SOKOLOVSKI V V. Statics of soil media [M]. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  12. YANG Kuo-hsin, LIU Chia-nan. Finite element analysis of earth pressures for narrow retaining walls [J]. Journal of GeoEngineering, 2007, 2(2): 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. FRYDMAN S, KEISSAR I. Earth pressure on retaining walls near rock faces [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering: ASCE, 1987, 113(6): 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TAKE W A, VALSANGKAR A J. Earth pressure on unyielding retaining walls of narrow backfill width [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2001, 38: 1220–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SALMAN F A, AL-SHKARCHI Y J, HUSAIN H M, SABRE D K. Distribution of earth pressure behind retaining walls considering different approaches [J]. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 2010, 5(9): 1389–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  16. LIN Yu-lian, LIU Yong-jian, LI Jia-le. Dynamic response law about gravity retaining wall to seismic characteristics and earth fill properties [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(3): 657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. YANG Xiao-li. Upper bound limit analysis of active earth pressure with different fracture surface and nonlinear yield criterion [J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2007, 47: 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. EVANGELISTA A, SANTOLO A S D, SIMONELLI A L. Evaluation of pseudostatic active earth pressure coefficient of cantilever retaining walls [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30: 1119–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ZHU Jian-feng, XU Ri-qing, LI Xin-rui, CHEN Ye-kai. Calculation of earth pressure based on disturbed state concept theory [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(4): 1240–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia

    S. P. Yap, F. A. Salman & S. M. Shirazi

Authors
  1. S. P. Yap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. A. Salman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. M. Shirazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. P. Yap.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(RG086/10AET) supported by the Institute of Research Management and Monitoring, University of Malaya, Malaysia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yap, S.P., Salman, F.A. & Shirazi, S.M. Comparative study of different theories on active earth pressure. J. Cent. South Univ. 19, 2933–2939 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1361-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1361-2

Key words

Search

Navigation