Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric optimization and performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with simulated annealing algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking the ratio of heat transfer area to net power and heat recovery efficiency into account, a multi-objective mathematical model was developed for organic Rankine cycle (ORC). Working fluids considered were R123, R134a, R141b, R227ea and R245fa. Under the given conditions, the parameters including evaporating and condensing pressures, working fluid and cooling water velocities were optimized by simulated annealing algorithm. The results show that the optimal evaporating pressure increases with the heat source temperature increasing. Compared with other working fluids, R123 is the best choice for the temperature range of 100–180 °C and R141b shows better performance when the temperature is higher than 180 °C. Economic characteristic of system decreases rapidly with the decrease of heat source temperature. ORC system is uneconomical for the heat source temperature lower than 100 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SCHUSTER A, KARELLAS S, KAKARAS E, SPLIETHOFF H. Energetic and economic investigation of organic Rankine cycle applications[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 31(8): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MAGO P J, CHAMRA L M, SRINIVASAN K, SOMAYAJI C. An examination of regenerative organic Rankine cycles using dry fluids [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(8): 998–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. SALEH B, KOGLBAUER G, WENDLAND M, FISCHER J. Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy, 2007, 32(7): 1210–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LAKEW A A, BOLLAND O. Working fluids for low-temperature heat source [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(10): 1262–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MADHAWA HETTIARACHCHI H D, MIHAJLO G, WILLIAM M W, YASUYUKI I. Optimum design criteria for an organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources [J]. Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1698–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DAI Yi-ping, WANG Jiang-feng, GAO Lin, Parametric optimization and comparative study of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(3): 576–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SCHUSTER A, KARELLAS S, AUMANN R. Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical organic Rankine cycles [J]. Energy, 2010, 35(2): 1033–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ROY J P, MISHRA M K, MISRA A. Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using organic Rankine cycle [J]. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 5049–5062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ZOU En, LI Xiang-fei, LIU Ou-geng, ZHANG Tai-shan. Optimization design for parameters of FNN: Learning algorithm of chaos simulated annealing [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2004, 35(3): 443–447. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ZHOU Long, MOU Yi, YOU Xin-ge. Application of simulated annealing algorithm in image segmentation of pests in stored grain [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2010, 38(5): 72–74. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. YANG Shi-ming, TAO Wen-quan. Heat trans-fer [M]. Shanxi: Northwest Industrial University Press, 2006: 177. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. WEI Dong-hong, Lu Xue-sheng, LU Zheng, GU Jian-ming. Dynamic modeling and simulation of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for waste heat recovery [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(10): 1216–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. JENSEN J M. Dynamic modeling of thermo-fluid systems with focus on evaporators for refrigeration [D]. Denmark: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. QIAN Song-wen. Heat exchanger design handbook [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002: 68. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. PAPADOPOULOS A I, STIJEPOVIC M, LINKE P. On the systematic design and selection of optimal working fluids for organic Rankine cycle [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(6): 760–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG Sheng-jun, WANG Huai-xin, GUO Tao. Performance comparison and parametric optimization of sub-critical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and trans-critical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation [J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(8): 2740–2754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LIU B T, CHIEN K H, WANG C C. Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery [J]. Energy, 2004, 29(8): 1207–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-qi Wang  (王志奇).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2009GK2009) supported by Science and Technology Department Funds of Hunan Province, China; Project(08C26224302178) supported by Innovation Fund for Technology Based Firms of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Zq., Zhou, Nj., Zhang, Jq. et al. Parametric optimization and performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle with simulated annealing algorithm. J. Cent. South Univ. 19, 2584–2590 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1314-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1314-9

Key words

Navigation